I’ve reached out plenty to Baron with constructive tips and well organized research, some of which has been breaking stuff. No interest, which is of course Baron’s prerogative. I respect that, don’t expect any interaction. I have therefore published on my own with some decent distribution which I’m sure have reached Baron. But no interaction there either. I can live without Barons appreciation or interaction, but I don’t think we, who care about progress and resolution, are well served by a limited investigation. I watched yesterdays episode. Baron was classy, humble. All good. He even gave a question on the spy plane and the drones time. That’s progress, but its conclusion was that there is nothing to see here. That drones has no weight, not worth pursuing unless more proof. The main argument he used was: “the spy plane had no drone port” I don’t find that a serious argument. As if the drone sightings are disqualified if the spy plane couldn’t deliver them. At least as expected. The drones we’ve seen were there. With or without any help from a plane. That’s an avenue worth investigating. The spy plane was there (and in St George), that is a fact. It warrants investigation too. Both Baron and Daisy are great researchers and their, and their audience’s, attention on this could make a huge difference. The argument that they will investigate everything else but this is what defines a limited hangout. Granted, it might be outright dangerous to investigate along this avenue. I respect that, but I don’t respect monetising a limited investigation. I would respect don’t investigate at all unless all is game.

Just so you guys know… she has more followers… so… 💅🏻 💀💀💀 @iamcoachcolin @baroncoleman @researcherdaisy @IanCarrollShow for the win at the end

Back from out of town. Go live tonight?

lol “Shes scared to debate me. Won’t even do it for $300k I offered” “Oh look. She took $300k. What a sell out” Ya’ll are too much

Candace Owens is free to run her business however she wants, but the Glacier ad read looks really fucked up when you consider that Charlie Kirk literally died rejecting blood money.

Crawl back into your hole, ya paid shill.

Did we watch the same thing? J you have become so removed from being objective it’s disappointing to say the least.

Baron, respectfully can you explain why it was important to even speak about the Shawn Ryan Show and @leahfiles at all? Neither of them had anything to do with you or the case I’ve been a member for months and watched every show since Google Trends and have never seen you so openly bias on any issue before. The first time I watched Shawn Ryan was when Candace went on and I loved it. But the interview with Leah was horrible. What you consider to be psychological ninja moves by Ryan, I just saw a host who was barely present. You had many details wrong and it was clear you didn’t read Leah’s posts. She never asked for it to be released. She was standing up for herself and refusing to be called a liar by Shawn. You didn’t even know she was told minutes prior that she couldn’t mention a list of names. Just a quick dive into Shawn and his very dark past I’m wondering how a drug trafficking criminal rose to the top of podcasting. It’s odd. Again I’m confused why you stepped into the middle of something that was between Leah and Shawn. Yesterday’s show was very disappointing and I know I’m not alone on those feelings.