
PHD Student @TAMU | Cybersecurity Center | AI/OT/Quantum Research
Joined July 2026
- Tweets119
- Following92
- Followers52
- Likes1.5K
Pinned Tweet
Made a dashboard so you guys can watch my Claude look for a new Pulsar on my spare compute :)
astralsearch.tail21bdb4.ts.n…
1
5
526
My take on the Harvard PhD strike is that if they do get more money they should share it with me. I think that would be cool maybe.
1
4
80
The whole lab is posting on Twitter instead of researching. I think we've reinvented Chinese content farms from first principles.
1
3
116
Maybe were giving the Chinese labs too much credit this is kinda funny
Kimi K3.1 Pro doesn't just recall hidden tests (great thread by @JSchaeff3r). It also writes fake OpenAI ciphertext 🤯
Give it a send_message tool in Codex and sometimes it sends ciphertext instead of its report. Then it gets confused by what it just sent 🤔
5
452
OpenAI just loves to continuously rage bait the NSA by patching their backdoors
Our security researchers built an autonomous cyber vulnerability discovery, exploitation, and patching pipeline.
In a single run with an upcoming cyber model, it validated and generated patches for 948 local privilege escalation vulnerabilities in the Linux kernel at a total API cost of $1.2 million.
7
294
Scale really does just solve everything huh
How long does a finding about LLMs stay true?
We re-tested 50 widely cited findings about LLM behavior (various biases, hallucination, etc). Within 15 months, most no longer held or had substantially reduced effects.
LLM findings has short shelf life zou-group.github.io/llm-clai…
Great job by @oq_35!
6
232
The biggest struggle with AI research is how hot my room gets at night with my GPU running 24/7
4
373
YOLOing my travel grants into Anthropic stock
Anthropic has filed an S-1 registration statement with the SEC related to its proposed IPO.
Read more: anthropic.com/news/s1-sec
Legal disclaimer: A registration statement relating to these securities has been filed with the SEC but has not yet become effective. These securities may not be sold, nor may offers to buy be accepted, prior to the time the registration statement becomes effective. This post does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy these securities, nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any state or jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such state or jurisdiction.
5
309
Keith Crabb retweeted
Anthropic has filed an S-1 registration statement with the SEC related to its proposed IPO.
Read more: anthropic.com/news/s1-sec
Legal disclaimer: A registration statement relating to these securities has been filed with the SEC but has not yet become effective. These securities may not be sold, nor may offers to buy be accepted, prior to the time the registration statement becomes effective. This post does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy these securities, nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any state or jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such state or jurisdiction.
Only getting my PhD so that one day my threats of great evil are taken with a little credibility
4
299
I shouldve become an inference provider
One answer to what's driving GPU rental prices:
Token demand on OpenRouter is up ~27x since last November, from ~6T/week to ~165T/week
Open-weight models now handle ~72% of those tokens, up from ~28% last November
Charts of the Week: a16z.news/p/charts-of-the-we…
Just realized this might make specific PII unlearning feasible. Since specific memorized facts are more localized than assumed under superposition, neuron or circuit pruning might be a realistic way to make models forget. Has anyone checked?
interpretability might be the most important scientific problem in the world right now, as I don't think we can solve alignment if we don't know what we're building. I think I have good news about it. I co-authored early work in mechanistic interpretability at OpenAI and came away pessimistic, because neural networks appeared to fold into arbitrary tangled knots. years later, I started openai's first large-scale automated interpretability project, finding about 2% of neurons legible with the primitive tools we had
with modern agentic tools and a much closer look, the picture looks totally different. the vast majority in models up to trillions of parameters are legible, and their circuits beautiful. many famous examples of tangled neurons turned out to be misunderstood. The roadblocks I expected mostly aren't there. I now think ambitious interpretability will be solved by the time we need it most, and possibly quite soon, as automated scientists keep improving. it may be a bitter lesson for interpretability: the simple thing, at absurd scale, works
already-clean.goodfire.com/
4
182
Would like to see how this holds up on non-social science papers ngl
By every measure, Opus 4.8 beats human experts as peer reviewers in a study of 124 Harvard social science papers covering a range from statistical analyses to formal models to qualitative work.
As academics, we need to figure out how to adapt the practice of science to AI, fast.
2
145


















