Occasional scribbler, permanent grump!

Crewe
Joined February 2014
Kevin Hickson retweeted
Britain’s Secret Intelligence Service (SIS) is advertising for a summer intern. If you’re 'White British', however, please don’t think about applying. You are expressly prohibited. (Hell, even persons who identity as 'White Other' are eligible!) I don’t think I’ve ever seen a more blatant example of racism against a specific ethnicity by a state institution. Utterly indefensible.
432
2,063
125
7,254
210,123
Kevin Hickson retweeted
I've written for @unherd about the curious discovery of the importance of sovereignty by some liberal commentators, now that Trump threatens Canada's, but who thought it expendable in the Brexit negotiations... '[F]or many on the Remain side of the argument, sovereignty was an illusory concept. What mattered were the economic benefits of exchange with the EU. Sovereignty was expendable. Increased economic output from lower trade barriers mattered above all else. The former Bank of England economist Danny Blanchflower memorably declared, “You can’t eat sovereignty”.... [C]ommentators who once suggested that “sovereignty” was some kind of Right-wing fantasy are now praising Carney for standing up for Canadian sovereignty against the US. Many such examples can be found in the Guardian. Jonathan Freedland once denounced British Leavers as suffering from a “sovereignty delusion” but has praised Carney’s “defiant patriotism” against Trump. Rafael Behr diagnosed a “syndrome: a Brexit model that makes a sacred principle of sovereignty” from which the gains were “nil, while the costs are mounting”. He has since criticised the Trump administration’s “protection racket”, adding that “the price is paid in sovereignty”. Earlier this week, the Guardian leader heaped praise on Canada for “fighting for its sovereignty while the US appears to be fighting for cheaper goods”.' unherd.com/newsroom/canada-u… – at Faringdon, England
42
179
25
643
63,835
Kevin Hickson retweeted
Extracts from article in Spectator 16th August by Brendan O’Neill: Behold the human wreckage of the cult of diversity. The tragedy of Jason Arday is that he was both built up and destroyed by the ruthless machinery of DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion). The academy made him into the golden boy of its philistine project of ‘decolonisation’ and gave not one thought to what the consequences might be if his thin story unravelled, as it inevitably would. No one can deny it now: wokeness makes false gods and real tragedies. . . This is the poison chalice of the state religion of diversity. It lays traps for the very people it celebrates. It handpicks members of ‘the oppressed’ for moral anointment and institutional gushing while leaving them open to exposure as others start to query their credentials. That’s the toxic bargain of identity politics: it builds teetering pedestals for ethnic-minority thinkers, meaning their fall from grace is often twice as fatal. And what a pedestal they made for Arday. They worshipped him as ‘the best in the world’. They beatified him as a black wunderkind whose very presence in a place like Cambridge might help to wash away its sins of whiteness. They canonised him as a living monument to ‘decolonisation’. It was precisely this, their giddy, narcissistic desire to manufacture a kind of black saviour, that made them turn a blind eye to the questionable elements of Arday’s CV and life story. They sacrificed their due diligence to the god of decolonisation. And Arday suffered. He was both poster boy and sacrificial lamb of the diversity crusade. Even as he gained from it – reaching the dizzying heights of a Cambridge professorship – he was being damned by it. The foundation of myth and sand his starry career was built on was untenable. Its collapse was a given. It is a testament to the ideological blindness of the inhabitants of our ivory towers that none of them foresaw it. . . . The Faustian ruthlessness of it all is mindblowing. . . . The media is the only institution in this entire tragic scandal that did its job properly. Journalists found a story and they told it. It was the academy and Arday’s colleagues who failed to do their jobs. Who failed to prize merit over identity, and failed to foresee the public embarrassment that would befall their falsely promoted friend. They ignored the truth – the media found it. I and others have been arguing for years that the politics of identity is a disaster for all, black and white alike. White kids are overlooked, black kids are patronised. Whites are branded ‘privileged’, blacks ‘oppressed’. Whites are seen as the beneficiaries of historic crimes who must atone for past sins, blacks as history’s perma-victims who require the gracious helping hand of the state. We are demonised or infantilised according to the accident of our race. Enough. Let our monument to Jason Arday be the restoration of the true ideal of equality. We couldn’t save Jason but we can save merit from the monstrous jaws of identity.
533
2,537
306
11,551
579,923
Kevin Hickson retweeted
Jason Arday’s death is tragic. But please spare us the sanctimonious complaints that he was merely an ‘obscure’ academic who was the victim of a racist witch-hunt. The probing and questioning and exposure were entirely legitimate. Arday was plainly guilty of plagiarism. He had also made a series of fantastical claims about his life and career. He ended up being appointed as a professor at one of the world’s most august seats of learning – where his students, who had worked extremely hard to get there, were paying large fees for the privilege of being taught by him. Far from being obscure, Arday had happily engaged with the media over many years, often repeating his false claims. He appeared on numerous TV shows and guest edited Radio 4’s flagship Today programme. He even carried the Olympic torch. Moreover, he had secured a major publishing deal for his autobiography, which was set to be released in Britain and the US just as the scandal broke. By no measure was this man ‘obscure’. When a fellow academic in Plymouth began to question his credentials, Arday (or someone close to him) made a complaint to the police. When a journalist from Times Higher Education started investigating, he was subjected to a police inquiry and also received a threatening letter from the leading libel solicitors, Carter Ruck. Arday and those around him were clearly not averse to hounding others when they felt like it. It’s very possible that Arday did not have sufficient support measures in place when he was finally exposed – but that’s on others. The investigation and questions amounted to legitimate journalistic inquiry. This was never just about Arday’s fabulism. It was also about the increasingly controversial philosophy of DEI, the obsession of our political, corporate and educational institutions with pushing that philosophy, and how it might have led to someone with Arday’s subpar credentials being appointed in the first place. These are all valid questions to ask – and, by asking them, journalists are simply doing their jobs.
949
3,572
280
21,277
629,741
Kevin Hickson retweeted
RIP Jason Arday. I never met you, never knew you and what I read of your work I found unimpressive. And yet I feel a sadness and loss at your death. You never deserved for it to end this way. You were used and even abused by others for their own ends. I do not believe you were in any way a bad person. Indeed there are many reasons to believe you were a good person. You needed help. Yet when you needed help it never came. Despite the huge pile on, nobody seemed to be there for you. You were left to die on your own, which only adds to the sadness. RIP Jason Arday. You were failed by those who had a duty of care towards you.
1,313
1,306
327
15,791
1,792,548
Kevin Hickson retweeted
The Jason Arday case 'is an aberration' says Cambridge. Actually it is just the most visible manifestation of a diversity-industrial complex. My @HeterodoxCentre report into UKRI grant funding👇 shows that DEI keywords are up 24 times since 2000 and have doubled since 2020
19
90
5
396
9,671
Kevin Hickson retweeted
"Take any aspect of the Western inheritance of which our ancestors were proud, and you will find university courses devoted to deconstructing it..." Sir Roger Scruton
68
1,546
55
7,963
97,188
Kevin Hickson retweeted
When I finished my PhD, I applied for 2-3 jobs in academia before thinking better of it & going into publishing. Openings for 18th century political historians were close to non-existent anyway, but in retrospect getting out very early was one of the best decisions I ever made
15
23
6
465
24,142
In early September, Highbury Hall - the home of Joseph Chamberlain - is open for free tours. @richardmarcj and I went there earlier this summer and it's well worth visiting. Booking info here: eventbrite.co.uk/e/highbury-…
2
6
1
33
2,303
Kevin Hickson retweeted
Two of the greats that aren’t with us anymore 💔 There’s no one like them. We miss you Caroline & Liz ❤️ #TheRoyleFamily #SueJohnston #CarolineAherne #LizSmith
63
166
6
4,164
50,316
Prof Jason Arday called the police on a fellow academic and a journalist who were investigating discrepancies in his academic and charitable record. Devon and Cornwall Police declined to investigate Prof David Harris after he sent Prof Arday a series of legitimate questions about inconsistencies in his record via email. Meanwhile, the Metropolitan Police investigated a harassment allegation against Times Higher Education journalist Jack Grove for doing his job. The Met went on to advise Mr Grove not to contact Prof Arday again because it was affecting the professor’s mental health. This is the same force that sent five armed police officers to arrest Irish comedian Graham Linehan as his plane landed at Heathrow over three gender-critical posts on X. It is not good enough for Met Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley simply to say his force “dropped the ball” in this case. It happens too often. Jason Arday sought to use the police as a tool to silence those who were investigating his record.
193
1,819
57
9,255
147,324
I’ve written to both the Education Secretary and the Vice Chancellor of Cambridge University on behalf of those students who have been failed by the university and Arday’s poor teaching. There should be a full investigation into what went wrong and who bears responsibility for these failures. Those students who have been failed because of inadequate teaching/supervision should file complaints and deserve compensation or a fee refund. Potentially these students are entitled to damages for breach of contract or negligence. Justice must be done for failed students, DEI hiring must stop and those responsible for this scandal must be held to account. And no, this isn’t a ‘racist pile-on’. This is about doing the right thing. Write up here 👇 telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/08…
409
1,980
59
11,205
162,552
Kevin Hickson retweeted
I had a working-class upbringing, did not go to university, and have no background in academia. When writing my book, Despised, as well as a thousand other opinion pieces, it never occurred to me for a moment that I should reproduce the work, ideas or arguments of others without proper attribution. And if I had, I would not expect to have been shielded from proper scrutiny or criticism. This is a basic rule of authorship, and one that should not be set aside for reasons of political expediency.
64
253
6
3,073
83,025
Kevin Hickson retweeted
Jason Arday and the University of Cambridge very clearly have a case to answer. Yet the DEI-obsessed lanyard class want us to believe the claims are baseless and that anyone who thinks otherwise is driven by racist sentiment. Their response is indicative of how they approach every issue: if the truth is likely to get in the way of their political ideology, then the truth can take a hike, and anyone who speaks it must be besmirched and bullied into silence. These authoritarians must be faced down at every turn.
42
217
11
1,751
32,250
Kevin Hickson retweeted
Good to see that John Healey wants to buy British when it comes to defence. As EU members we would not be allowed to do that.
809
1,104
102
9,253
422,165
A tiresome phenomenon which should be seen for what it is - aggressive, unjustified and brazenly anti-western. Reject.
55
145
12
923
16,287
Kevin Hickson retweeted
It is hardly consistent to repeatedly accuse a person of stoking “hate and division” throughout the country, yet then refuse to challenge him in a by-election, thereby giving him a free run at a parliamentary seat. If Farage really was the monster he is depicted as being, wouldn’t the anti-Reform forces jump at the chance to defeat him?
285
480
28
2,931
57,840
My dear father has died. Mother was the heart of our family but Dad was the driving force, a man of huge energy and creativity - our North Star 🙏. Brian Clouston, landscape reclamation specialist behind Liverpool International Garden Festival – obituary telegraph.co.uk/obituaries/2…
240
76
6
1,746
38,948
Kevin Hickson retweeted
Starmer's central role in attempting to block the implementation of the 2016 referendum as Shadow Brexit Secretary was, in my view, utterly outrageous. And, as is characteristic of the man, Starmer backed a 2nd referendum for cynical reasons of personal advancement: to trash Labour's electoral prospects, while endearing himself with wildly pro-EU members and driving a wedge between them and Corbyn (who clearly wanted Brexit implemented). It was a deeply insulting and contemptuous policy to the millions of Leave voters, including the 37% of Labour voters who voted Leave, disproportionately located in Labour's working-class historic heartlands. This was a huge, flashing signal that the Labour Party didn't respect them. Moreover, in a world where dangerous anti-democratic actors refuse to acknowledge election results they don't like, it was unacceptable for Labour to try to block the result of a democratic vote, which everyone was told would be implemented and was confirmed the following year by both parties in a general election. – at Faringdon, England
This quoted post is unavailable.
6
30
1
145
12,641