Election Fraud Prevention
Everyone wants my opinion on Texas; in a sense, it’s an opinion on multiple states that fall into the same category.
Our elections rely on public trust that results are genuine, reflecting the real intent of legal voters. That is at the root of the national election integrity crisis - people increasingly struggle to trust outcomes. States that enshrine mail-in voting (universal or expanded) entrench a process that the rest of the world views as highly susceptible to corruption and cheating, making elections less secure. The model in those states is to ensure the side that can best harvest ballots never have a low turnout election.
At the core of election corruption is the voter roll. Studies and reveals have pointed out fraudulent (dead, moved, non-citizen, illegal, fake) in red and blue states, and they get worse with Auto Voter Registration (24 states). We have been operating elections like this, with bad rolls, for decades, well back into the middle of the 20th century. Combined with mail in balloting states they provide a never ending stockpile of harvestable ballots (see CA or WA).
Texas reported 267,000 mail ballots on 10 million total. Not enough to change the outcomes. Therefore, if Texas (or SC, MS, KS, IA, etc) have election corruption as instrumental to outcomes this year, it is contained in the electronic election infrastructure (“the machines”).
The failure to pursue election transparency/audits in elections that were won by GOP candidates, especially after 2024 when multiple senate seats tanked after Trump was declared the winner of those same states, has made it infinitely more difficult to pursue today.
I spoke with a candidate who won his US House race in Texas yesterday, who is a big advocate of election integrity reforms, and told him he is in a position to call for an audit of his own race. He has skin in the game and isn’t able to be branded with the “sore loser” label. I will be pressing him on this and there are several other candidates who can be approached on it if you know them personally. But time is of the essence.
There will be people who read this who think I suddenly think elections are fair, or worthy of public trust. I didn’t think that after 2024 and wrote an entire compendium of findings from 2020/24 changes, analyzing the laws of the various states and the impacts on vote counts. Elections in this country are full of holes no matter which party wins them, and the failure to accept that presents a major operational hurdle for when your desired candidates aren’t called the winners.
There will also be those who read this and assume I’m doing something other than point out the fact that we must do things differently this time if we want the answers we need. The president has briefed the nation on foreign efforts (and successes) in breaching databases and people who know a lot more about the electronic infrastructure have highlighted the issues with systems in use across the country.
Without primitive election systems in place and voter rolls not filled with bad entries, we will forever be in this same position - incapable of verifying election outcomes. My relative restraint on this topic this year is based more on the lessons learned in seeking transparency than it is any belief that we have secure elections people should trust instinctively.
Candidates who won races are the only ones in a functional position to drive scrutiny into the 2026 midterms, and for exactly this reason I believe NC was the best target for a 2020 audit.
I hope this clears the air. Elections in America are no more trustworthy than they were 6 years ago. The only difference is that 6 years worth of case studies suggest different tactics must be used to compel the necessary transparency, and it is much more difficult than it would be from the perspective of winner.
Fraud vs Truth = Both lead to chaos but at least with truth, we have a chance to save our country.
This is exactly what I have been saying. America is at a crossroads, and there are two paths ahead.
The first is the one many of us are hoping for.
Evidence comes forward, allegations are investigated, and anyone proven responsible is held accountable.
But let’s be honest.
That path comes with chaos.
There is no clean, comfortable way to confront this election fraud, these radicals will riot in the streets faster than you can say tranny.
The other path is much darker.
If there extremists are allowed to be seated in our government and gain the power to turn their ideology into policy.
That comes with its own chaos, and consequences we could spend generations trying to undo.
It doesn’t matter which path unfolds both will lead to some crazy times.
Buckle up. It’s going to be a crazy ride.
2020 Election Fraud
BREAKING: Maricopa County election insider just TESTIFIED under oath — Dominion "techs" walked RIGHT INTO voting sites during a LIVE ELECTION, plugged in EXTERNAL HARD DRIVES to the machines, downloaded ballot images + sensitive data, then walked it OFF-SITE with ZERO chain of custody, NO logs, NO oversight.
What were they uploading/downloading in real time while votes were being cast? Where did that data REALLY go? Who was manipulating ballots behind the curtain?
This isn't oversight—it's COVER-UP. The storm is exposing the machines.
W.H.G
👀Susie Wiles / JD Vance?
Susie Wiles
👺🧑🦳👺🧑🦳MY SUSIE WILES THREAD 🧵 👇 🧾
You will be shocked at how many America first people & policies were blocked by Susie Wiles 👺
HERE ARE DOCUMENTS, POSTS, FACTS, VIDEOS & MORE EXPLAING WHY SUSIE WILES HAD TO BE FIRED
All she cared about was BIG MONEY DONORS & her daughter Katie Wiles' LOBBYING FIRM
I will continue to add to this each day I find new information so send me anything you know about Susie Wiles. The more you know, the more everything makes sense...
🎯 Burchett is dead on!
🚨 JUST IN: Rep. Tim Burchett DROPS this line after Republicans' midterm defeat
"I think Washington needs to quit blaming TRUMP and start blaming THEMSELVES for the mess we're in right now. We had SEVERAL opportunities to fix things. The stock-trading ban, I had a really strong bill that just said, no stock trading!" 💯
"The other, of course, was the price of fuel. I had a bill to deal with that on controls, export controls, and you know, that would have dropped it overnight over a DOLLAR according to oil experts!"
"We got to get some GUTS we got to start doing what's right and quit lying to the public and we need to message better."
He's not holding ANYTHING back, and he's right.
Republicans need to become the NATIONWIDE LEADERS on issues like stock trading bans and gas prices through 2028. That's how we make a comeback @timburchett
SCOTUS on Congress investigations.
The why do they waste all their time and our money doing it?
Kimmyb retweeted
What an anniversary present Steve has given us…
This is a must read.
FREE BRIAN COLE JR
🚨EXCLUSIVE New Video🧵 - Today is the 1st Anniversary of our article published @theblaze naming a possible forensic match to the J6 pipe bomber. An event that set off a chain reaction that forever affected many people's lives. Rather than review the complexities of the last year, I'm going to keep it simple today. This video shows Ms. Shauni Kerkhoff arriving at @CapitolPolice HQ on the morning of January 6, 2021. (Continued in comments below. ⬇️)
Kimmyb retweeted
🚨 BREAKING: OVER 2,000 UNCOUNTED BALLOTS DISCOVERED IN IOWA! 🚨
🗳️ ANOTHER STATE. MORE ELECTION QUESTIONS!
As concerns continue to mount about election procedures across the country, we’re now seeing reports out of JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA!
🚨 HERE’S WHAT WE KNOW:
📍 Johnson County, Iowa
🗳️ 2,017 absentee ballots were identified that had NOT been included in the preliminary election results!
⚖️ Iowa Secretary of State Paul Pate is involved as officials move forward with an audit to determine exactly what happened.
📊 According to the report:
🔴 2,017 absentee ballots were missed in the preliminary count.
🔴 A full audit is planned.
🔴 Officials say the ballots are NOT expected to change election outcomes.
🇺🇸 BUT HERE’S MY QUESTION!
How do more than 2,000 ballots get left out of an election’s preliminary results in the first place?!
We’ve been discussing election discrepancies in TEXAS, MICHIGAN, GEORGIA, AND NOW IOWA!
I’m not saying this automatically proves fraud, but election officials absolutely need to explain how these mistakes happen and what safeguards prevent them!
🔥 HOW MANY MORE STATES ARE WE GOING TO HEAR ABOUT?!
👇 WHAT DO YOU THINK? Are these isolated administrative mistakes, or do they point to bigger problems with election procedures nationwide?
#BreakingNews #IowaElection #ElectionIntegrity #Election2026 #JohnsonCounty #ElectionTransparency #Voting #Politics #TheLegislativeLounge
Kimmyb retweeted
🚨 JUST IN: The US Department of Labor is unveiling a MAJOR prosecution list of FRAUDSTERS who illegally defrauded the visa program, stole taxpayer dollars, money laundered and more
They should be DEPORTED!
"In previous administrations this was all looked at as bad accounting or bad paperwork errors. And President Trump and Vice President Vance, under this fraud task force, has made it very clear that it's no longer being looked at as an accounting error, that we are holding these individuals accountable, that we are clawing back the money, that we're giving it back to the American people!" 🇺🇸
The war on fraud will continue.
Dems won the House and Senate but they can't protect fraudsters any longer at the federal level, and we need to keep it going!
Kimmyb retweeted
This man is a Computer Scientist and he looked at my post regarding California’s identical election results for top government positions
🚨 He CONFIRMS from a computer scientist programming perspective how the results ARE FROM AN ALGORITHM, NOT REAL VOTE TOTALS 👇 IT’S RIGGED
Speaking as a computer scientist...
Note also that the numbers you referenced aren't all just 64-35, they're all 64.6 + or - 0.2, and 35.4 + or - 0.2. That's even more unlikely.
This is what happens when you don't pay attention in math class. Likely some corrupt programmer put in a random factor that he thought would alter the numbers, without making it look like it altered the numbers. Like (brain-dead example) "If this ballot was for the opponent, and the random number generator is greater than 0.6, then change it.". But he didn't bother to do the math, or he would have realized that if you use whatever that random element is, over enough cases, then the result converges on 64.6 and 35.4.
At least if I was going to vet the program that did this, then that's what I'd most expect to find. This is a typical undergrad mistake. Just because your algorithm has a randomizing element, that doesn't mean that the result isn't going to converge, over a large enough number of trials.
Also note that this kind of manipulation almost always leaves a footprint in the data. Statisticians who specialize in analyzing voting results know what properties honest results should have. Unless the corrupt programmer really knew what he was doing, they'll spot the strange results, and the nature of the strangeness will give them a strong clue as to what the programmer did.

























