Lars Iggy (@LarsTheBadMan) header
Lars Iggy (@LarsTheBadMan) profile picture

https://teapawt.net/t.co/qajA1yoA91 Fuck Fascists. 🇿🇦 Fuck Putin. 🇺🇦 Fuck Leon. Religion rots the brain. Gods are not real.

Uigeadail
Joined April 2022
Photo by Lars Iggy (@LarsTheBadMan)Photo by Lars Iggy (@LarsTheBadMan)Photo by Lars Iggy (@LarsTheBadMan)Photo by Lars Iggy (@LarsTheBadMan)Photo by Lars Iggy (@LarsTheBadMan)Photo by Lars Iggy (@LarsTheBadMan)Photo by Lars Iggy (@LarsTheBadMan)Photo by Lars Iggy (@LarsTheBadMan)Photo by Lars Iggy (@LarsTheBadMan)Photo by Lars Iggy (@LarsTheBadMan)
Now you know. You're welcome. Follow for more guidance in life.
29
5
3
69
37,698
Logic and math work because brains that tracked consistent regularities in the environment survived. Their success is explained by evolutionary and physical processes. Inventing an "immaterial" plane adds nothing and explains nothing—it's nothing more than ornamental metaphysics.
7
7
28
683
Lars Iggy retweeted
I’ve waited ten years for someone to say this about Donald Trump.
1,137
18,442
980
133,520
5,909,317
Not long ago, I posted this list of Bible verses. A Christian replied “NONE OF THOSE ARE IN THE BIBLE!”
112
102
8
498
31,384
Lars Iggy retweeted
10
19
1
78
1,182
Biden was actually good for the stock market. Rates were heading lower. Inflation was coming down. The 10-year was at 3.96%. Gas was in the 3’s. If Trump had just fixed the border, which most Americans wanted, and left everything else alone, we’d probably be doing a lot better right now. Instead we got tariff which have been an unmitigated disaster. Yes, the stock market is doing okay, but it could be doing so much better. And here’s the thing: we personalize economics onto presidents when it’s mostly situational. Bush Sr. got blamed for a recession from the Gulf War. Clinton got credit for a recovery that was probably just cyclical. This time though is self-inflicted. The president has inflicted self-harm on the economy.
195
542
33
2,889
88,588
Christianity didn't survive because of "Jesus loves you". It survived because it threatened people with HELL if they didn't love him back.
Christianity didn't survive because it was popular. It survived because it was true.
78
29
6
199
7,050
Replying to @TheRickWilson
Imagine how much better the world would be if the US had Ukraine’s leaders and Ukraine had US weapons!
41
165
4
2,101
17,902
The Big Bang theory explains the expansion of our spacetime out of a hot, dense state. We DO know it happened; no faith is required. There is no knowledge of creation or an absolute beginning. Your analysis FAILED due to your ignorance.
Let's do a comparative analysis: THEIST: I have faith an eternal Mind started everything. ATHEIST: I have faith eternal nothing started everything. Both of us have faith. Neither of us was there at the Big Bang. We are looking at the same evidence. We just have different interpretations. I believe Mind produced matter. You believe matter produced mind. The difference? My faith explains order, consciousness, and morality. Your faith has to explain them away.
7
3
2
63
1,026
Tuesday morning. Drinking dry sherry and waiting for Tittie Tuesday on X. Bring it on!
1
4
223
You know what "god" wants, while at the same time you can't even show your "god" is real? 😇😇😇🤡🤡🤡
God wants America to criminalize abortion.
5
1
1
46
673
Ladies and gentlemen, I present; Marco Bootio.
14
41
3
139
2,271
She wins 🏆 the internet for tonight!
1,216
14,887
410
85,601
1,575,402
Run fast and smile all the time. Hopefully nobody will see how ugly you are. 😎 Follow for more guidance in life. 😁
1
75
Sunday! Stay out of church! Have some champagne! Enjoy! Don't be an asshole!
2
13
333
As usual, you got your ass whopped as you were shown WRONG. Funny how that happens time after time.
Replying to @LarsTheBadMan
Lars as usual you're copying and pasting AI without any understanding of what you're talking about. Let me learn you some knowledge. 1. This is an example where 1 part did 2 things, then got separated into 2 parts that each did one thing. The system was and remains irreducibly complex, but instead of one part performing multiple functions, now that one part is split into two parts that each still do the same thing. That's not a gradual increase in complexity or a development of novel features or parts. It takes an already existing systems and breaks it down. Kind of the opposite of evolutionary development. Fail counter: 1 2. This is an example where they basically they found things that already fit each other and then optimized. Then they simply assume evolution to make the claim that one is earlier than the other. None of this shows how any parts arose in the first place. It assumes the very thing it's supposed to be proving. Fail counter: 2 3. The LTEE example is so old and tired. A regulator got stuck on to allow this newly discovered function. Nothing new evolved. You're calling it a "new function" but the point is about the origin of the system itself, not whether the system can be adapted. Fail counter: 3 4. You're merely repeating an assumption of the theory which has never been observed or demonstrated naturally. This very assumption requires a system first - which means it's assuming the very thing it's supposed to demonstrate. Fail counter: 4 5. Is a red herring. Totally irrelevant to the point. Fail counter: 5 6. Design is a historical inference. True. And it's stronger because it actually relies on what we can observe, while evolution extrapolates wildly beyond any known observation. Claiming ID has predicted nothing just betrays your own ignorance on the topic. Fail counter: 6 out of 6
74
You have ribs. Yet you can't even produce a blow-up doll from it. 🤡🤡🤡
And they believe it did itself 🤡🤡🤡
3
1
1
23
553
All you did was point to Jesus as the creator. Really. Get a grip.
1
1
1
18