
๐ Statistiche e analisi sul Lecce - ๐ Numeri, dati e curiositร - ๐โค๏ธ Il Lecce, in numeri - Un progetto di @coldpatrix - Facebook: https://teapawt.net/t.co/FcyQG6371l
Joined June 2026
- Tweets249
- Following55
- Followers158
- Likes43
๐จ ๐๐๐๐๐, ๐๐ ๐๐จ๐๐ข ๐ก๐๐ฅ๐ข ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ก๐ง๐ฅ๐๐ฉ๐๐ก๐ง๐
๐ giornate
โฝ ๐ญ๐๐ฅ๐ข ๐๐ข๐
๐ 5,1 xG. Differenziale โ5,1
Geubbels, ล tuliฤ, Esteban: nessuno a segno. Due ranking @FotMob , una sui totali e una sugli indici per 90': Lecce sempre ultimo.
Numeri allarmanti
๐ ๐๐๐๐๐, ๐จ๐ก๐ ๐ฆ๐จ๐ฃ๐๐ฅ๐๐ข๐ฅ๐๐ง๐ฬ ๐ฆ๐ง๐๐ฅ๐๐๐
Contro il Genoa, 700 palloni giocati, di cui 151 in attacco. Eppure, una sola grande occasione.
Il dato piรน preoccupante? Servono molte azioni per creare pericolo. Agli avversari ne bastano molte meno
Gli xG di Lecce-Genoa a cura di Understat:
๐จ๐ฅ Lecce 1,42
๐ฅ๐ฆ Genoa 2,02
Occasione piรน pericolosa quella di Stulic (0,55 xG), sul tiro parato poco prima del gol annullato a fine primo tempo
#LecceAnalytics #LecceStats
Con i due gol subiti dal Genoa nei primi 29 minuti, il Lecce รจ la squadra di Serie A con piรน gol al passivo incamerati nei primi 30 minuti di ciascun match (ben 11). Nessun organico fa peggio dei giallorossi in questa graduatoria
#LecceAnalytics #LecceStats
๐ฎ๐ก๐ด ๐๐น ๐๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ณ
Falcone: abilitร attuale 69.
Tiago Gabriel: 66โ80, potenziale fisso piรน alto.
Berisha 61โ75, Ngom 62โ73, Fatah 62โ72.
Lupo: 40, potenziale variabile 65โ80.
๐ 78 giocatori, scala FMInside 0โ99.
Chi รจ sottovalutato?
#Lecce #FM27
๐ ๐๐ฅ๐ข๐ฆ๐๐ก๐ข๐ก๐-๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ฑ-๐ญ: ๐๐จ๐ ๐ฆ๐ค๐จ๐๐๐ฅ๐, ๐๐จ๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ข๐๐ข
๐ฃ Frosinone: collegamenti fitti, triangolazioni, piรน soluzioni.
๐ด Lecce: rete frammentata, pochi snodi, giocatori isolati.
Non solo meno palleggio: manca connessione fra i reparti
๐ค Made with AI
๐ ๐๐ฅ๐ข๐ฆ๐๐ก๐ข๐ก๐-๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ฑ-๐ญ
๐ฏ xG: 4,21-1,56.
Migliore chance del Lecce: colpo di testa (mancato) di Gandelman al 20'
๐ก๏ธ xGA (gol attesi concessi):
๐ฅ Lecce 22,41 (squadra peggiore della Serie A)
๐๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐ณ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ด๐ถ๐น๐ฒ. I giallorossi concedono davvero troppo
๐ ๐๐ฅ๐ข๐ฆ๐๐ก๐ข๐ก๐-๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ฑ-๐ญ: ๐๐ ๐๐๐ฉ๐๐ฅ๐๐ข ๐ฬ ๐ก๐๐ ๐๐๐ข๐๐ข
โฝ Palloni giocati: 649-512
๐ In attacco: 159-86
๐ฏ Tiri in area: 16-8
๐ก๏ธ Recuperi: 65-47
Baricentro del Frosinone circa 7 metri piรน alto in entrambi i tempi e netta supremazia territoriale
๐ ๐๐ฅ๐ข๐ฆ๐๐ก๐ข๐ก๐-๐๐๐๐๐: ๐ข๐๐ง๐ฅ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ฃ๐๐ฆ๐ข๐๐
Il rigore dato al Lecce e quello negato al Frosinone pesano. Ma i numeri parlano
โฝ Possesso: 60%-40%
๐ฏ Tiri: 26-15
๐ xG: 3,08-1,45
๐ Tocchi in area: 34-15
Episodi discutibili, superioritร netta
#LecceStats
๐ ๐๐๐๐๐-๐๐จ๐ฉ๐ ๐ฌ-๐ฎ: ๐ข๐๐ง๐ฅ๐ ๐๐ ๐ฃ๐ข๐ฆ๐ฆ๐๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ข
โก Vertical tendency: 16,7%-19,8%
๐ก๏ธ PPDA: 12,5-11,7
๐ Recuperi alti: 6-3
๐ฏ Passaggi nella metร campo avversaria: 194-182
๐๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐ผ ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐น๐ฒ, ๐บ๐ฎ ๐ฝ๐ถ๐ฬ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ฒ ๐ถ๐ป ๐ฎ๐๐ฎ๐ป๐๐ถ
Lecce Analytics retweeted
Azioni difensive โ Lecce Serie A 2026.
Dati aggiornati il: 26/10/26, 11:22 (UTCโ3)
Marcatori, assist, voti e altre statistiche sul sito: futstatto.pages.dev/
๐ ๐๐๐๐๐-๐๐จ๐ฉ๐ ๐ฌ-๐ฎ: ๐๐ ๐ก๐ข๐๐ข ๐ง๐๐ง๐ง๐๐๐ข
โฝ Possessi nel terzo offensivo: 62-43
๐ Ingressi in area: 14-10
โก Passaggi tra le linee: 13-20
๐ฏ xG per tiro: 0,064-0,091
Il Lecce avanza, ma crea pochi squilibri. Il limite รจ nella qualitร delle occasioni
Lecce 0โ2 Juventus | Three points, and the same problems underneath
Juve won in Lecce, but this wasnโt a good away performance. It was a side that has spent the whole season failing to build on its own control, and this time it happened to get away with it.
The night itself
Lecce were the better side on the ball and without it. They had 1.03 xG to 0.73, 16 shots to 8, and 14 box entries to 10. They pressed Juve properly too: 18 high regains to 7, and 8 shots from transitions against Juveโs 1.
Juve put two shots on target all night and both went in. McKennie scored from a set-piece move on 28', a 0.38 chance and the best opening of the match. Douglas Luiz added a 0.04 strike from distance on 40'. Lecceโs 16 attempts averaged 0.064 xG each, with no clear chance among them.
And this isnโt new. Eight league games in:
1๏ธโฃ Dominance that doesnโt kill games. Against Milan, Juve had 1.64 xG to 0.12 and drew 1-1. At Cagliari it was 2.26 to 0.59, with a 90% field tilt and 22 shots, and it finished 1-1 again. Four points dropped from games they owned.
2๏ธโฃ Conceding more than they allow. Opponents have created 5.03 xG against Juve and scored 8. Sassuolo got 3 from 1.05, Lazio got 3 from 0.66. When teams do get in, too much of it goes in.
3๏ธโฃ The attack has dried up. In the first six rounds Juve averaged around 1.7 xG and 18 shots a game. In the last two: 0.93 and 0.73 xG, 9 and 8 shots, two on target each time, and one big chance across both.
4๏ธโฃ The press has disappeared. Early on Juve were winning the ball high 20 to 34 times a game. Against Lazio it was 10, at Lecce 7, while their opponents won it back 12 and 18 times.
5๏ธโฃ The build-up is breaking down. Only 19.1% of their build-ups succeeded at Lecce, the lowest of the season. Their exposure when losing the ball is also climbing, at 19.0% against Lazio and 16.2% here.
Fourteen points from eight games is a respectable table position. The underlying trend says the control is slipping, and that results like this one are becoming the exception rather than the rule.



















