Lecce Analytics (@LecceStats) header
Lecce Analytics (@LecceStats) profile picture

๐Ÿ“Š Statistiche e analisi sul Lecce - ๐Ÿ“ˆ Numeri, dati e curiositร  - ๐Ÿ’›โค๏ธ Il Lecce, in numeri - Un progetto di @coldpatrix - Facebook: https://teapawt.net/t.co/FcyQG6371l

Joined June 2026
Photo by Lecce Analytics (@LecceStats)Photo by Lecce Analytics (@LecceStats)Photo by Lecce Analytics (@LecceStats)Photo by Lecce Analytics (@LecceStats)Photo by Lecce Analytics (@LecceStats)Photo by Lecce Analytics (@LecceStats)Photo by Lecce Analytics (@LecceStats)Photo by Lecce Analytics (@LecceStats)Photo by Lecce Analytics (@LecceStats)Photo by Lecce Analytics (@LecceStats)
๐Ÿšจ ๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—–๐—–๐—˜, ๐—œ๐—Ÿ ๐—•๐—จ๐—–๐—ข ๐—ก๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ข ๐——๐—˜๐—œ ๐—–๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง๐—ฅ๐—”๐—ฉ๐—”๐—ก๐—ง๐—œ ๐Ÿ”Ÿ giornate โšฝ ๐—ญ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ข ๐—š๐—ข๐—Ÿ ๐Ÿ“‰ 5,1 xG. Differenziale โˆ’5,1 Geubbels, ล tuliฤ‡, Esteban: nessuno a segno. Due ranking @FotMob , una sui totali e una sugli indici per 90': Lecce sempre ultimo. Numeri allarmanti
1
1
2
347
๐Ÿ“‰ ๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—–๐—–๐—˜, ๐—จ๐—ก๐—” ๐—ฆ๐—จ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—œ๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—œ๐—ง๐—”ฬ€ ๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—˜ Contro il Genoa, 700 palloni giocati, di cui 151 in attacco. Eppure, una sola grande occasione. Il dato piรน preoccupante? Servono molte azioni per creare pericolo. Agli avversari ne bastano molte meno
1
1
1
101
Approfondimento qui ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿผ shorturl.at/nb6Pw (Credits: @SerieA) #LecceAnalytics #LecceStats
9
Gli xG di Lecce-Genoa a cura di Understat: ๐ŸŸจ๐ŸŸฅ Lecce 1,42 ๐ŸŸฅ๐ŸŸฆ Genoa 2,02 Occasione piรน pericolosa quella di Stulic (0,55 xG), sul tiro parato poco prima del gol annullato a fine primo tempo #LecceAnalytics #LecceStats
1
2
291
Con i due gol subiti dal Genoa nei primi 29 minuti, il Lecce รจ la squadra di Serie A con piรน gol al passivo incamerati nei primi 30 minuti di ciascun match (ben 11). Nessun organico fa peggio dei giallorossi in questa graduatoria #LecceAnalytics #LecceStats
1
2
131
๐ŸŽฎ๐ŸŸก๐Ÿ”ด ๐—œ๐—น ๐—Ÿ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐˜‚ ๐—™๐— ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿณ Falcone: abilitร  attuale 69. Tiago Gabriel: 66โ†’80, potenziale fisso piรน alto. Berisha 61โ†’75, Ngom 62โ†’73, Fatah 62โ†’72. Lupo: 40, potenziale variabile 65โ€“80. ๐Ÿ“Š 78 giocatori, scala FMInside 0โ€“99. Chi รจ sottovalutato? #Lecce #FM27
1
1
1
120
Ps: Ivan Ilic non รจ presente perchรฉ annoverato nella rosa del Torino, con abilitร  attuale di 63/100 e abilitร  potenziale di 67/100
1
26
๐Ÿ“Š ๐—™๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ก๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜-๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—–๐—–๐—˜ ๐Ÿฑ-๐Ÿญ: ๐——๐—จ๐—˜ ๐—ฆ๐—ค๐—จ๐—”๐——๐—ฅ๐—˜, ๐——๐—จ๐—˜ ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ง๐—œ ๐——๐—œ ๐—š๐—œ๐—ข๐—–๐—ข ๐ŸŸฃ Frosinone: collegamenti fitti, triangolazioni, piรน soluzioni. ๐Ÿ”ด Lecce: rete frammentata, pochi snodi, giocatori isolati. Non solo meno palleggio: manca connessione fra i reparti
๐Ÿค– Made with AI
1
1
1
109
๐Ÿ“Š ๐—™๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ก๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜-๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—–๐—–๐—˜ ๐Ÿฑ-๐Ÿญ ๐ŸŽฏ xG: 4,21-1,56. Migliore chance del Lecce: colpo di testa (mancato) di Gandelman al 20' ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ xGA (gol attesi concessi): ๐Ÿฅ‡ Lecce 22,41 (squadra peggiore della Serie A) ๐—Ÿ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ณ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฒ. I giallorossi concedono davvero troppo
1
1
1
125
๐Ÿ“Š ๐—™๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ก๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜-๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—–๐—–๐—˜ ๐Ÿฑ-๐Ÿญ: ๐—œ๐—Ÿ ๐——๐—œ๐—ฉ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—œ๐—ข ๐—˜ฬ€ ๐—ก๐—˜๐—Ÿ ๐—š๐—œ๐—ข๐—–๐—ข โšฝ Palloni giocati: 649-512 ๐Ÿ“ In attacco: 159-86 ๐ŸŽฏ Tiri in area: 16-8 ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ Recuperi: 65-47 Baricentro del Frosinone circa 7 metri piรน alto in entrambi i tempi e netta supremazia territoriale
1
1
1
353
Approfondimento qui ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿผ shorturl.at/OlXZp (Thanks @SerieA) #LecceAnalytics #LecceStats
32
๐Ÿ“Š ๐—™๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ก๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜-๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—–๐—–๐—˜: ๐—ข๐—Ÿ๐—ง๐—ฅ๐—˜ ๐—š๐—Ÿ๐—œ ๐—˜๐—ฃ๐—œ๐—ฆ๐—ข๐——๐—œ Il rigore dato al Lecce e quello negato al Frosinone pesano. Ma i numeri parlano โšฝ Possesso: 60%-40% ๐ŸŽฏ Tiri: 26-15 ๐Ÿ“ˆ xG: 3,08-1,45 ๐Ÿ“ Tocchi in area: 34-15 Episodi discutibili, superioritร  netta #LecceStats
1
98
๐Ÿ“Š ๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—–๐—–๐—˜-๐—๐—จ๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐Ÿฌ-๐Ÿฎ: ๐—ข๐—Ÿ๐—ง๐—ฅ๐—˜ ๐—œ๐—Ÿ ๐—ฃ๐—ข๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—ข โšก Vertical tendency: 16,7%-19,8% ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ PPDA: 12,5-11,7 ๐Ÿ”„ Recuperi alti: 6-3 ๐ŸŽฏ Passaggi nella metร  campo avversaria: 194-182 ๐—Ÿ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ผ ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ฒ, ๐—บ๐—ฎ ๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐˜‚ฬ€ ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ฎ๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜๐—ถ
1
1
1
69
Lecce Analytics retweeted
Azioni difensive โ€” Lecce Serie A 2026. Dati aggiornati il: 26/10/26, 11:22 (UTCโˆ’3) Marcatori, assist, voti e altre statistiche sul sito: futstatto.pages.dev/
1
1
43
๐Ÿ“Š ๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—–๐—–๐—˜-๐—๐—จ๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐Ÿฌ-๐Ÿฎ: ๐—œ๐—Ÿ ๐—ก๐—ข๐——๐—ข ๐—ง๐—”๐—ง๐—ง๐—œ๐—–๐—ข โšฝ Possessi nel terzo offensivo: 62-43 ๐Ÿ“ Ingressi in area: 14-10 โšก Passaggi tra le linee: 13-20 ๐ŸŽฏ xG per tiro: 0,064-0,091 Il Lecce avanza, ma crea pochi squilibri. Il limite รจ nella qualitร  delle occasioni
Lecce 0โ€“2 Juventus | Three points, and the same problems underneath Juve won in Lecce, but this wasnโ€™t a good away performance. It was a side that has spent the whole season failing to build on its own control, and this time it happened to get away with it. The night itself Lecce were the better side on the ball and without it. They had 1.03 xG to 0.73, 16 shots to 8, and 14 box entries to 10. They pressed Juve properly too: 18 high regains to 7, and 8 shots from transitions against Juveโ€™s 1. Juve put two shots on target all night and both went in. McKennie scored from a set-piece move on 28', a 0.38 chance and the best opening of the match. Douglas Luiz added a 0.04 strike from distance on 40'. Lecceโ€™s 16 attempts averaged 0.064 xG each, with no clear chance among them. And this isnโ€™t new. Eight league games in: 1๏ธโƒฃ Dominance that doesnโ€™t kill games. Against Milan, Juve had 1.64 xG to 0.12 and drew 1-1. At Cagliari it was 2.26 to 0.59, with a 90% field tilt and 22 shots, and it finished 1-1 again. Four points dropped from games they owned. 2๏ธโƒฃ Conceding more than they allow. Opponents have created 5.03 xG against Juve and scored 8. Sassuolo got 3 from 1.05, Lazio got 3 from 0.66. When teams do get in, too much of it goes in. 3๏ธโƒฃ The attack has dried up. In the first six rounds Juve averaged around 1.7 xG and 18 shots a game. In the last two: 0.93 and 0.73 xG, 9 and 8 shots, two on target each time, and one big chance across both. 4๏ธโƒฃ The press has disappeared. Early on Juve were winning the ball high 20 to 34 times a game. Against Lazio it was 10, at Lecce 7, while their opponents won it back 12 and 18 times. 5๏ธโƒฃ The build-up is breaking down. Only 19.1% of their build-ups succeeded at Lecce, the lowest of the season. Their exposure when losing the ball is also climbing, at 19.0% against Lazio and 16.2% here. Fourteen points from eight games is a respectable table position. The underlying trend says the control is slipping, and that results like this one are becoming the exception rather than the rule.
1
2
3
101
Approfondimento qui ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿผ shorturl.at/qtCja (Thanks @TacTical_41!) #LecceAnalytics #LecceStats
1
1
25