Pinned Tweet
If you describe what is occurring in the US as a “coup” or “fascism,” or refer to the elected government as a “regime” (left or right), I have deep contempt for you.
Your cosplaying as oppressed makes light of the suffering of those who have lived under actual authoritarianism.
I deleted some tweets b/c I really don’t want to blast people on here. I’d rather be someone positive, although I fail miserably, over and over.
I would just encourage people to think about the remainder of the thread & the sort of person they are allowing themselves to be.
Replying to @Legal_Fil
Because I’m exercised here, allow me to add:
One big reason we are where we are, politically, is because otherwise decent people have allowed themselves to be compromised. Then, discovering they are compromised, they backfill a story about why they are not. ….
I am under no delusion about how, in a binary system, people will choose a lesser evil. It is understandable & maybe even moral.
But telling yourself that a lesser bad is actually good is an abdication of your responsibility as a moral agent. You should not shy away from truth…
While I appreciate the effort that goes into early voting analysis, I genuinely don’t understand the breathlessness that surrounds it at this stage of voting
Any number of narratives and counter narratives can be spun.
Legal Phil retweeted
I don’t think all Muslims are supportive of Muslims Brotherhood. I think he has been, in his own hand, under his own name. To conflate Muslim and Muslim Brotherhood supportive, as he does here, is almost as bigoted as calling Arab-Americans cat-calling, loosie-selling quick stop owners, which he also did.
Going to be interesting when people start making stuff up about Uygur after his death, knowing they can’t be sued for defamation, and Piker and the hive start crying about how it is inappropriate.
We’re going to drop a bombshell documentary on @TheYoungTurks tomorrow morning called The Closetocracy. Which US Senator did we catch using male escorts?
Legal Phil retweeted
(1/2)Between about 6:45-9:00AM today, an estimated 2” fell on the headwaters of Gould Wash! That was enough to send a flood wave down the Wash and into the town of Hurricane.
Both shocking and totally expected.
xitter.cf/drantbradley/status/21…
Legal Phil retweeted
I am tired of seeing books that I can read whenever I want added to "banned books" tables.
If bookstores want to show they are brave, show the Satanic Verses. They should have copies of the Charlie Hebdo issue that spurred that massacre.
If you want to be brave, be brave.
Holy guacamole: In a judicial smackdown, Judge J.E. Smith tears into Judge Wingate for his "careless[] exercise" of judicial power and "sloppy edicts based on falsehoods and fabrications." Mississippi's anti-DEI law can go into effect. Judicial AI use takes a beating. Reassigned.
Legal Phil retweeted
I can’t imagine how dumb you have to be to come up with “stock buybacks should be illegal.”
What Tur is noticing is that Talarico is a weirdo, and putting up a weirdo makes it harder for people to cross the aisle (even when the alternative is a reprobate like Paxton).
He could still win, of course, but a more normal candidate, like Allred, would’ve been an easier sell.
Has anyone figured out why centimillionaire Ro Khanna draws the line at billionaires?
Seems like the same arguments would call for a wealth tax on people with his level of assets too.
In the spirit of solidarity with poor California kids, I’m sure that @RoKhanna will donate 5% of his roughly $230 million to the state.
Thank you for your leadership, Rep. Khanna!
Jokes aside, if Khanna was serious or had a modicum of political acumen, he’d give away that ~$11.5 million.
But he has such avarice and is so dishonest that we know he won’t.
Yeah, totally not scapegoating.….
No. I’m not “scapegoating” AIPAC.
You support Trump's illegal war in Iran. Americans don’t.
You want taxpayers to spend billions funding the Israeli government. Americans don’t.
Your super PAC is spending $9 million to defeat Abdul because he opposes your agenda. Unacceptable.























