interesting that you love a shredded/pounded meat product mixed with blended fat. yours is about a 1:1 ratio, yeah? the funny thing about it is that in Europe we've had similar foods with similar ratios since Roman times, but they were in more appealing forms.

there are, basically, four subcategories. left to right: 1) jerky (cut into strips, dried) 2) biltong (dried as steaks, then cut) 3) slimjims (ground, stuffed into casings, dried) 4) 'meat bars' (shredded, pressed, dried) there's another whole category, too 1/2

i wonder how well i can make my version of this point (which differs from EFL's) here. something i should do anyway. lfg i guess. firstly, the tails come apart - they always come apart. this is the problem behind why managing to any metric always fails (i.e. Goodhart's law) 1/

a diet of all beef, mostly fat, or one that involves dry fasting are -less- restrictive in terms of actual energy than what is needed to create weight-loss on a bacon-and-eggs version. most who fail at 'carnivore' under-ate while trying to turn eggs and cheese into ersatz bread.

Ok. This'll make a good repost at least, and an attempt at modeling a willingness to put into words a complex conception, built out of various parts some of which inevitably will turn out to be misremembered (or since-debunked) if I look them up. No notes, one take, lfg. 1/15

Oh I see what happened here. Someone summoned James and then he got rope-a-doped. I've been thinking about this topic rather a lot lately, so let's see if I can express myself in a way that doesn't utterly vindicate Tucker for assuming I'm a troll. challenge mode: impossible 1/15