
• ASTEROID💎 • Collab Ma • Community previous job • Ma Community Ma @GoKiteAI Collab Ma @TabiVibe Ambassador @SonicLabs
Joined February 2024
- Tweets7.2K
- Following1.9K
- Followers3.7K
- Likes6.6K
Linkeys.BNB 🔶 retweeted
Blindsats 开交易了 要起飞了
挂单低于250sats/枚 blind 需要给挂单税
出售还要另外收5 blind,目前地板 300 sats,感觉对了
blindsats.com/transfer#trade
Blindsats 场外 15倍了
虽然已经出了 3w个 $BLIND,但看样子应该是卖飞了,目前已经可以领取和转账:
blindsats.com/profile#claim
剩下的筹码我好好拿住了,这个叙事要是跑出来相信至少比劳什子甲烷强的多,目前市值 3M 左右把,考虑下要不要接回来,感觉真的不简单了,前几天看大盘撑不住卖的,买回来怎么说,0.08 有没有出的 hh。
Linkeys.BNB 🔶 retweeted
Continuing today's memecoin recap series
The first token I want to cover today is $WOLFPACK
This has been one of the hotter names on Robinhood Chain recently, and quite a few people have been asking me to take a closer look at it
After spending some time digging into the narrative, Hooke Protocol, liquidity structure, and the team's recent announcements, I think there's actually an interesting story behind $WOLFPACK
However, there are also several things worth understanding before putting money into it
1. First, what exactly is $WOLFPACK?
The most interesting part of this token is its narrative against Wolfpack Research, a well-known short-selling firm that previously published a highly critical report on XMax ($XMAX, formerly $XWIN)
The $WOLFPACK team is using the Wolfpack name to build an opposing narrative, positioning themselves as the "Wolfpack of Robinhood" and trying to turn the token into a Wall Street meme that rallies the community against short sellers
They've also been pushing the potential $XMAX short squeeze narrative, alongside memes like the dancing wolf to attract attention
According to figures previously circulated within the community, $XMAX short interest was reportedly around 9.22M shares, equivalent to nearly 17 days to cover
I haven't independently verified whether those figures are still accurate, so I wouldn't treat them as current short interest data
And of course, high short interest doesn't automatically mean a short squeeze will happen. Even if $XMAX stock rallies significantly, that doesn't necessarily mean $WOLFPACK will benefit directly
2. The connection with Hooke Protocol is where things get more interesting
Hooke Protocol (@hookefun) is developing a permissionless stock tokenization model on Robinhood Chain, using Uniswap V4 hooks and a dynamic trading tax mechanism
One of its main products is $hXMAX, a tokenized stock designed to track the price of $XMAX shares through an oracle
It's important to understand that $hXMAX isn't actual XMAX equity. It's an onchain token designed to replicate the stock's price movements
According to Hooke's announcements, the protocol uses a dynamic trading tax of around 2–4%, with the collected revenue flowing into its treasury
The $hXMAX/USGD pool was initially announced with approximately $10M in liquidity. Hooke also stated that the liquidity had been locked for 21 days
However, a liquidity lock only restricts withdrawals during the lock period. It doesn't guarantee price stability or eliminate trading risks
And this is where $WOLFPACK comes into the picture
Rather than existing as a standalone meme, $WOLFPACK is directly paired with $hXMAX, creating a connection between memecoins, tokenized equities, and the short squeeze narrative in traditional markets
I actually find the structure quite clever
The meme attracts attention, that attention brings users toward $hXMAX, trading activity generates revenue for Hooke, and part of that revenue is expected to flow back into supporting $WOLFPACK
But there's a difference between a model that looks good on paper and one that has actually proven itself
3. The biggest catalyst right now is the buyback mechanism
Hooke has publicly announced plans to use tax revenue generated from $hXMAX trading activity to buy back $WOLFPACK, instead of prioritizing $hXMAX buybacks as originally planned
They've also mentioned using future launchpad revenue to continue buying back the token
To me, this is what makes $WOLFPACK different from many ordinary memecoins
If Hooke actually implements consistent buybacks, the token could benefit from an additional source of demand beyond speculative community buying
But there's one extremely important detail here
$WOLFPACK itself is essentially a standard ERC-20 token
Based on the contract information available to me, its source code hasn't been verified. That's a significant risk because it prevents a complete review of potential administrative privileges and hidden contract functions
I also haven't seen evidence confirming any built-in tax, burn, or automatic buyback mechanism within the token contract itself
In other words, the proposed buyback mechanism operates outside the token contract and depends entirely on Hooke's decisions and execution
At the time of my research, I hadn't found onchain evidence confirming that Hooke had actually executed any $WOLFPACK buybacks
There were also no verified figures showing how many tokens had been repurchased or how much capital had been deployed
Hooke previously mentioned a treasury of approximately $200K, but I haven't seen a sufficiently detailed public dashboard to verify the balance, actual tax revenue, or funds allocated toward buybacks
So for now, I still consider this a commitment from the team rather than a proven mechanism generating consistent buying pressure
4. Another important point is $WOLFPACK's actual position within the ecosystem
In my view, the core alpha Hooke is trying to build lies in $hXMAX and its stock tokenization infrastructure, not necessarily $WOLFPACK itself
$hXMAX is the main product, while $WOLFPACK functions more like an attention layer attached to the ecosystem to attract users and strengthen the narrative
That's not necessarily a bad thing
In memecoin markets, attention can sometimes matter more than utility, especially when a token can continuously benefit from activity surrounding a related product
But it also means $WOLFPACK is heavily dependent on Hooke
If $hXMAX loses trading volume, the launchpad gets delayed, or Hooke stops supporting the token, the current narrative could weaken very quickly
It's also worth mentioning that the launchpad is still in the planning stage, and I haven't seen a concrete launch timeline
Therefore, any future launchpad revenue allocated toward buybacks remains speculative at this point
5. Let's talk about the team and transparency
The official @wolfpackmeme account was created on September 7, 2026
It's still relatively new, with no publicly disclosed founder or identifiable development team
Hooke Protocol also hasn't clearly disclosed the identities of the people behind the project, based on the information I've gathered
One interesting detail is that both @wolfpackmeme and @hookefun were reportedly created on the same day, September 7, 2026, and both show Taiwan as their signup country
That's an interesting coincidence worth paying attention to
However, it's nowhere near enough evidence to conclude that both projects are operated by the same team or individuals
I also haven't found evidence that Vlad Tenev, Robinhood, or other major public figures have directly acknowledged or officially supported $WOLFPACK
Just because a project is building on Robinhood Chain doesn't mean Robinhood itself is backing it
That's an important distinction
6. Now let's look at the chart, which is what matters most to me when planning an entry
$WOLFPACK had an explosive move from a very low market cap to an ATH of approximately $6.5–6.8M before correcting back toward $2M
That's nearly a 70% drawdown from the top
Looking at the current structure, selling pressure appears to have cooled significantly compared to the initial distribution phase
However, the chart is still forming lower highs, and trading volume has also been declining
Based on my personal observations, the current $2M market cap area looks relatively reasonable for a small speculative bet if you're comfortable with the risk
That said, there's still no confirmed reversal
For those looking for a more conservative entry, I'd personally prefer waiting for a dip toward the $1.4M market cap area and watching how price and buyers react there
If market cap breaks below $1M, I'd cut the position rather than stubbornly holding and hoping the narrative comes back
Another thing worth considering is liquidity
The token's liquidity is still relatively thin compared to its volatility, so don't focus solely on market cap while ignoring slippage and how difficult exiting a position could become during heavy selling
7. So what could actually push $WOLFPACK higher from here?
I think there are three main catalysts worth watching
First, Hooke needs to execute real buybacks and publicly share the onchain transactions
That would be the most important step in turning the current narrative from promises into something measurable
Second, the Hooke launchpad needs to go live
If the platform allows projects to launch tokens paired with $hXMAX and successfully generates revenue, the buyback model could gain a more sustainable source of funding
Third, we need to watch the performance of $XMAX stock and whether the short squeeze narrative continues attracting attention
If that story gains momentum, $WOLFPACK could benefit from the additional exposure
On the other hand, if there are no buybacks, no meaningful product updates, and trading volume continues fading, I think it'll be difficult for the token to maintain momentum purely through memes
Overall, I see $WOLFPACK as an interesting narrative play, but still a highly speculative one
I like how the team has connected Wolfpack Research, the $XMAX short squeeze story, and Hooke Protocol into a relatively unique narrative
The fact that Hooke has publicly committed to using revenue for buybacks is particularly worth monitoring
But before increasing my conviction, I want to see actual buyback transactions, more transparent treasury data, and clearer progress on the launchpad
For now, I think $WOLFPACK could be worth a small gamble at the right entry, but it's not something I'd size heavily into based on the current information
If you're already holding, I'd keep an eye on price action around $2M and any updates from Hooke
If you're not in yet, there's no reason to FOMO. I'd rather wait patiently for a better entry
The narrative is there. The attention is there. What's missing now is execution from the team
0x5199ea953D71D6a5413bE1b2EFeCD26aAcab0000
Linkeys.BNB 🔶 retweeted
机构到底在担心什么?
最近密集拜访了香港一些加密业务机构,除了稳定币、支付相关,大家都还是头疼于既要区块链等公开透明又想要隐私和控制。
Doppler 刚上了 bithumb,我正巧翻到了他们提出了 XLS-96 很有意思,可以看看这个思路,下次再去科普我就有新料了。
Mark一下!
Linkeys.BNB 🔶 retweeted
Doppler 刚公布的路线图,看点很多!
Doppler 早期给 XRP 和 RLUSD 做生息Vault,只是为了解决XRP原生不能生息的困境,但这仅仅是个开始,最终目标是做代币化上链的基础代币操作层。在传统资本市场中,资产如果不能Yield、lend、Borrow或者做一些杠杆操作,那其实意义并不大,更别说机构面对拉夸的流动性、分散的工具和合规黑洞,他们压根就不敢入场。
那么Doppler是怎么做的呢:
1️⃣ 资产与网络向机构主阵地迁移 XRP只是Doppler的开始 在资产端,他们正在 Base 上接入 Coinbase 封装的 cbXRP,后续逐步纳入力度更大的代币化股票与债券;在主网,除了主流 EVM 网络,Doppler 计划直接部署到专为传统金融结算设计的 Canton 网络,对就是那个超多机构用于结算的CC。
2️⃣ 开放资管底座,引入外部量化与多元收益 以往金库主要跑自营的衍生品或者中性化套利,而在新阶段中,Doppler 推出了管理型Vault,把托管和结算基础设施开放给外部专业量化团队,让投资者按风险偏好挑选基金经理,底层资产也同样扩张,不局限于交易,国债,短债等金融化资产也会陆续端上来。
3️⃣ 押注 XLS-66 协议,构建原生借贷与机构信贷 Doppler 正在基于 XRP 账本底层的 XLS-66 提案构建原生借贷平台。为合规机构提供无抵押信用借贷,这一点XRPFi上Doppler是第一位,龙头地位。
4️⃣ 头寸代币化,彻底激活二级 此前用户的金库份额只是一笔内部记账,无法向外转移。Doppler 正在 EVM 网络上开发金库凭证代币,未来金库份额、借贷头寸以及私募基金权益都将转化为链上代币。持有者既能享有底层收益,又能将凭证拿到外部去中心化金融协议中二次质押,把资金效率最大化。
5️⃣ 基础设施级合规与监控 针对机构资金最在意的风控合规,Doppler 选择把合规审查直接做成产品底层的代码逻辑,配合持牌对手方协作和实时数据透明看板,取代低效的人工作业流程,毕竟存钱最重要的是安全~
纵观整个加密行业,代币化赛道的发展重心早就变了。前几年的叙事几乎全停留在发资产上,各家都在比拼谁把美债或私人信贷搬到了链上;但现在大家发现,光把资产发出来没有任何意义,缺乏流动、无法抵押、没有配套信贷网络的资产,根本就不会有人去用,真正缺的,是配套设施。
Doppler 在过去一年里,用 1.5 亿美元的资金沉淀和与日本金融巨头 SBI 的合作,验证了传统机构对这套托管与清结算框架的认可。这份Roadmap展现出来的真正价值,也正是他们开始从Yield通道进化成资管与合规风控的完整底层操作系统,一旦这套网络在 Base、Canton 和 XRP 账本上全线跑通,Doppler的未来就是星辰大海~
base:0x07b3d902783c3c12b077508c3b5c00113d1291d0 只是开始~大的还在后面!
RT @crypto_pumpman: 今年 $XRP 生态最值得关注的: $XDP 今日 TGE,21:00 开盘 Kraken 同步支持
同步上线的还有 OKX、KuCoin、火币、Bybit 和 某个韩所 🤔
Bybit Earn 上的 XRP 收益产品,已知也由…
This quoted post is unavailable.












