Lin / 린 ✨️🇰🇷

Not my home but I know my way around

The object of your attraction must be a child in order to be a pedophile. You must violate someone's consent in order to be a rapist. Two adults consensually roleplaying is neither of those things. Resembling something is not enough for it to actually BE it.

And DDLG is reenacting incest, huh? These kinks are about the exchange in power dynamics, which must involve consent and discussion before the scenario starts. Therefore, not rape. I feel like you just don't know much about BDSM and that's okay to admit, you know that right?

This exactly^^^ Someone can physically be very gentle and say nothing but sweet kind things to someone during sex, but if the other party is not consenting and telling them to stop, that's still rape. It has everything to do with violation of consent, not just the physicality.

Correct. Rape play is not actual rape in the way a balloon animal is not an actual animal. It resembles its characteristics while not categorically being it. Rape is a violation of autonomy. If the roleplay lacks violation via pre-established enthusiastic consent, it is not rape.

Safe /version/ of rape. CNC can not be categorized as a type of rape whatsoever because you can't rape somebody who is giving you consent to treat them a certain way during a scenario. It's BDSM roleplay.

You were correct that they aren't engaging in good faith. I asked them where to draw the line for consensual physical injury and they confirmed leaving any marks on your partner whatsoever is depraved, including spanking, hickeys, and bruises from kissing too rough. witaf?

If that's what you and your sex partner like, then more power to you. But you are in the extreme minority and for most, there's only so many ways to keep things fresh if you aren't willing to explore more "depraved" sexual experimentation. Have a good one.

You have a very strange puritan perspective on this. For me, sex should feel liberating. If sex for you should involve hesitance and restraint in fear that you might leave any marks on your partner whatsoever, that doesn't sound liberating at all.

This wording implies that profics themselves are not also victims when there is considerable overlap in those groups. Not trying to open an argument with you, but I'm just pointing out that if intentional, this is also a form of disregarding the opinions of victims.

Where is the line drawn? Hickeys leave marks on someone's skin. Gripping someone's hand or kissing too passionately can leave bruises. None of that is depraved if the participants are enjoying it. Should those people be hesitant to hold hands or kiss their partner during sex?

—tap out at any moment. The moment consent is revoked, the other person must stop what they're doing. If they continue while aware consent has been revoked, that's not CNC anymore. That's rape. People who enjoy CNC only enjoy it because they know their actions are consented to.

Correct, there is no consent in rape. That's why CNC is categorically not rape. You don't just do this with anyone willy nilly. It's a BDSM activity that you discuss the parameters of with your trusted partner before you start. You set up safewords so either one of you can—

What metric says that sex is required to be plain and vanilla in order to be morally acceptable? Are you trying to tell us that having a spanking kink is depraved now? Gags and blindfolds? Handcuffs?

The same way people fantasize about being physically harmed during sex. Spanking, choking, biting, leaving bruises, etc. is all technically physical harm. The difference is that it's controlled and contained so that it's fun. It's an exchange of power, just like other BDSM forms.

If your partner is enjoying themselves, there's nothing to be guilty about. The give and take of power is fun. YOU know that you are a good person and that the consent is an absolute prerequisite for it being an attractive activity whatsoever. That's what really matters.

To be fair, the biggest purpose of a tail for most birds is either for mate-attracting or coordinating flight. The Goetias don't fly, so maybe they treat tails the same way they do for their "hair" feathers and they get trims?

Judging by this tweet I don't think you actually know what makes photographing/videotaping child sexual abuse morally objectionable.

There were two easy ways to not make her name seem like a caricature. Either render it in a way that's distinguishably Chinese (Qiu Chang/Qiu Zhang/etc.) or give her a generic Western first name. Literally nobody would've batted an eye at a Lily Chang or Emily Chang.