.toml

much like voice notes strike people as a disgrace because 'they take less effort to produce than to consume', so it is with AI "writing". you must understand that when i read text coming from you, I'm trying to understand what YOU mean. the only way you would be satisfied with having a text generator tell ME what YOU mean is with a 'eh, close enough' attitude. if I ask you what YOU meant with a sentence, or a word, who is going to answer? just imagine my question going back through to the text generator, and it actually realizing "huh I guess I don't know what my prompter meant with this" and asking YOU, back, what you meant. you must see how this has introduced an unnecessary intermediary, there's now MORE distance between ME and YOU. i understand that it is DIFFICULT to cast the language spell well enough that you read back what you just wrote and say "yes this is actually not a pale reflection of the vibrant pyroclasm of my interiority, there's an actual structural affinity between what's in here and what is now out there, in front of me". that is a hard skill to master, perhaps the hardest, it comes from a lot of practice and inner monitoring, but it is POSSIBLE to not be embarrassed by your lack of verbal dexterity. just read the thing you yourself wrote, read it back, "is this true? is this the right word?" you need to palpate everything, you need to obsess over it. this is not neuroticism, neuroticism is not excessive care, neuroticism is *misplaced* care, and any amount of care, when misplaced, is excessive. if something is infinitely important then no amount of care is excessive, if anything no amount is ENOUGH.