Royale (@LookDeeper88) header
Royale (@LookDeeper88) profile picture

probably nothing

Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Joined November 2023
Photo by Royale (@LookDeeper88)Photo by Royale (@LookDeeper88)Photo by Royale (@LookDeeper88)Photo by Royale (@LookDeeper88)Photo by Royale (@LookDeeper88)Photo by Royale (@LookDeeper88)Photo by Royale (@LookDeeper88)Photo by Royale (@LookDeeper88)Photo by Royale (@LookDeeper88)Photo by Royale (@LookDeeper88)
Royale retweeted
you become what you do daily
6
130
4
913
19,495
One last note on the Fear & Greed Index When people encounter the Fear and Greed Index in their feeds, they typically operate under a straightforward assumption: • low index values predict positive future returns • high index values predict negative future returns In other words, the index functions as a mean reversion indicator: when markets are overbought (extreme greed) or oversold (extreme fear), people expect that prices will revert toward the mean from these extremes. This is a hypothesis we can test. We can examine actual returns following extreme index readings. An easy and fast way to do this is to plot returns against index values and visually inspect the relationship. Under our mean reversion hypothesis, we would expect to see: • low index values: data points clustering top left • high index values: data points clustering bottom right The results reveal a lot of noise, but also a pattern, particularly in extreme greed territory: the indicator frequently fails during trending markets. When you trade based on overbought or oversold signals, you're essentially positioning against the prevailing trend. In practical terms, this means buying too early in downtrends and selling too early in uptrends. Instead of confirming our hypothesis, we not only find considerable noise but sometimes even the opposite of what we would expect to happen. Obviously, you can discuss how this approach could be slightly tweaked to improve performance. Criticism is welcome, as always. My point is: this is a metric influencers love to hype, but as the chart shows, it’s mostly just noise :)
94
112
42
1,049
219,185
"There is no acknowledgment [by Rodriguez] of the criminal world for whom digital currency is a gift." Judge Cote wanted Keonne to claim that financial privacy is for criminals – Because he didn't, she gave him the maximum sentence.
Replying to @theragetech
Rodriguez doesn't identify the problem Samourai sought to solve, Cote said. “There is no acknowledgement [by Rordiguez] of the criminal world for whom digital currency is a gift … There seems to be no recognition of the human suffering that was facilitated by the defendant.”
16
49
8
244
22,402
It took me 3 months to put 10 years of research on curiosity into a 20min presentation... ...So when @GrahamDuncanNYC challenged me to compress it down to 5min for the @SohnConf yesterday, I obviously went insane. Here it is.
123
442
181
2,542
545,999
This Harvard prof wants you to know that the reason he said Bitcoin would more likely hit $100 than $100,000 was NOT because he made any errors. Harvard professors don’t commit errors. He insists that if everyone else hadn’t acted so stupidly, he would have been right
Almost a decade ago I was the Harvard economist that said that bitcoin was more likely to be worth $100 than 100k. What did I miss? I was far too optimistic about the US coming to its senses about sensible cryptocurrency regulation; why would policymakers want to facilitate tax evasion and illegal activities? Second, I did not appreciate how Bitcoin would compete with fiat currencies to serve as the transactions medium of choice in the twenty-trillion dollar global underground economy. This demand puts a floor on its price, as I discuss at length in my new book Our Dollar, Your Problem. Third, I did not anticipate a situation where regulators, and especially the regulator in chief, would be able to brazenly hold hundreds of millions (if not billions) of dollars in cryptocurrencies seemingly without consequence given the blatant conflict of interest. cnbc.com/2018/03/05/bitcoin-…
392
393
39
5,437
259,392
Interesting trend to watch
1
10
1,062
I was reading cbBTC's user agreement, and came across this red flag: If @Coinbase loses the underlying BTC backing cbBTC, Coinbase's legal liability to you changes to where they no longer owe you full value of what you had, but a proportional share of whatever BTC is left
155
280
110
1,383
370,984
arbitrum stylus is an upgrade to arbitrum (one, nova, orbit) that adds support for smart contracts in WASM. what does this mean for devs? and for gas fees? what about solidity? let's get into that. stylus short thread 1/8 teapawt.net/arbitrum/status/183096…
5
12
1
78
6,934