Dr. Noel Carrascal retweeted
The Aizawa attractor, a particular case of the Lorenz attractor, has this system of differential equations:
dx = (z-b) * x - d*y
dy = d * x + (z-b) * y
dz = c + a*z - z³/3 - x² + f * z * x³
Atomic clocks: counting the seconds that could change physics - Berkeley News share.google/WxhtNMXtooxCBDt…
I attended a 'fire chat' longevity meeting yesterday at the Frontier Tower, SF. Things haven't change since I left the field, promising the impossible by people who think their way will work. I'd rather hear an honest and hopeless Let's try though we know we'll probably die at it
I am excited about #3IATLAS , I really hope it is something else other than a dumb 'rock', but unless that thing stops to resupply, for a pit stop, stretching of the legs, or it is redirecting to a more interesting destination; then, it is probably a dumb and unusual rock.
In such case, they could have been tunning in to some of our radio signals before communications blacked out on their solar approach, and they could probably communicate via radio after that. In such scenario, does any government have the ability to keep us on the dark?
Dr. Noel Carrascal retweeted
Replying to @PhysInHistory
Well, Bohr's model of the Atom has not held up; and Einstein's "Space-Time" gravity view is still Sci-Fi.
And neither could explain how an Atom creates Gravity. All that is known about Gravity today is, Gravity gets stronger with increasing density of Atoms in a volume.
why do this headlines grab us? this is fantastical in a bad way. the math is not like a blue print to build a time machine.. the proof is then something else,
"In a peer-reviewed paper, a scientist says he has mathematically proven the physical feasibility of a specific kind of time travel. The paper appears in Classical and Quantum Gravity." via @PopMech realclearscience.com/2024/12…
Did you ever hear about the babysecond before?
Visualizing the Nucleus youtu.be/ach9JLGs2Yc?si=dS73… via @YouTube






