Lucian Argues 🟧 (see bio)

The Electoral College was basically a compromise. The Founders wanted the president chosen with the people’s support, but they didn’t want a straight national popular vote or to just hand the decision to Congress. At the 1787 Constitutional Convention, they talked for months about how to pick a president. A direct popular vote worried them. Bigger states would almost always win. A lot of voters wouldn’t really know candidates from other parts of the country. And someone who was just good at stirring people up in one area could end up winning. Letting Congress pick the president worried them even more. The president would end up depending on Congress, which goes against the idea of keeping the branches separate. It also opened the door to backroom deals, corruption, or other countries trying to influence the choice. So they settled on the Electoral College. Each state gets electors equal to its number of House seats plus its two senators. Those electors cast the actual votes for president. You need a majority to win. If no one gets it, the House decides, and each state gets one vote. The states get to decide how they pick their electors. This setup treated the country as a union of states instead of one giant population. It gave smaller states more of a voice, kept the president from being controlled by Congress, and still let the people’s choice matter. Alexander Hamilton explained it in Federalist 68. He said the people’s voice still counts because they choose the electors. The electors would be people who could actually study the candidates and make a careful choice. Meeting in their own states (instead of all in one place) would make it harder for chaos, bribery, or foreign influence to take over. And the president would still depend on the people, not Congress, to stay in office. Hamilton also pointed out that being good at “the little arts of popularity” might get someone ahead in one state, but it would take real ability and character to win the confidence of the whole country. He thought the system made it very likely only someone highly qualified would end up as president. That’s the idea they were going for: a capable president with support across the country, protection for smaller states, and an executive that stayed independent. Things changed later with political parties and the winner-take-all system most states use now, but the basic structure is still what the Constitution set up. The Electoral College must be protected at all costs— it’s common sense in a country filled with lunatics.

I am anti-communist.

The House Oversight Committee is meeting on November 18 to discuss the @ATFHQ's 1.4 billion out-of-business records (see our linked editorial below). Repost and comment so committee leadership understands they need to take action now. 👇 @RepJamesComer @RepRobertGarcia @RepClayHiggins @GOPoversight news2a.com/editorials/atfs-1…

You can just write "fuck retards" and get 10k likes.

OK, so if capitalism is the “best thing to ever happen to poor people,” then why does it keep getting rid of them?

"The long-range anisotropy causes a net migration preferentially along the 001 axis under shock, so the key is to... wait a minute!!" -me, ordering dinner

the pH of the vagina is so acidic it can completely dissolve $1.25T in market capitalization

In 2022, the VPC exposed a marketing campaign by WEE1 Tactical for the JR-15, an AR-15 assault rifle specifically designed for children. The widespread negative publicity surrounding the gun resulted in California passing a law banning the marketing of guns to...

No one wants socialism but the boomers get “social security”

You are not rich enough to be afraid of socialism.