Pinned Tweet
I will attend you, My Name is Lukhwazi which is derived from Lukhwazi Ka Zwana.
Lukhwazi Ka Zwana gave birth to Ndabankulu Ka Lukhwazi. One of the popular figures in Zulu history in the late 19th Century.
My great-great Grandfather was a political chief that supported King Cetshwayo Ka Mpande’s Usuthu regiment against Zibhebhu Ka Maphitha and Mandlakazi.
My clan is Malandela, the same Malandela that gave birth to Zulu, hence it’s called “Zulu Ka Malandela”.
Zulu will then have great names as his descendants, historical great names like King Shaka Ka Senzangakhona , King Dingane Ka Senzangakhona and King Cetshwayo Ka Mpande.
I share a common ancestor with King Shaka Ka Senzangakhona. Our common ancestor is Malandela Ka Luzumane.
In conclusion, my name “Luke” is not equivalent to “smith” or all these funny names possessed by some Africans.
I am Lukhwazi, a direct descendant of Malandela. Yes, NginguMzulu.
Congolese people remain the most retarded group.
DR Congo sentences 66 soldiers to death for being 'cowards' bbc.in/48JM8mg
23
Luke retweeted
You Nubians did this to yourselves. Wasn’t Sudan ruled by Nubians during the 1970s? in the 1970s? Gaafar Nimeiry, a Nubian who ruled from 1969 to 1985 after his coup, came from a Dongolawi Nubian background in northern Sudan.
Nubians themselves helped drive their own languages—Nobiin and related Nile Nubian tongues—toward extinction by enforcing Arabic as the sole language of education, administration, and national belonging. Sudanese politics is a joke in itself. Nubians themselves were banning their own language to the point of extinction in order to Arabise. What a stupid people—a disgrace to their ancestors. They chose Arab civilisation and heritage over the ancient Kushite civilisation and heritage, which predates any Arab civilisation by thousands of years.
You’re unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more
This is based.
South Africa’s White population is projected to fall from 7% to just 2% by 2066, according to an analysis by @CommonSense_ZA based on Stats SA’s 2025 mid-year population estimates
5
245
lol, South Africans have nothing to do with FBAs and all that nonsense.
SA express their emotions over things that are happening in SA.
Mass illegal immigration is a reason.
You’re unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more
58
Another thing that I struggle to comprehend about Bantu immigration.
Nguni people and other Agropastolarist Bantu-speaking groups in Southern Africa are suggested to have adopted cattle-preservation from East Africans (Particularly from Nilotic groups and Cushitic ones) but they still have far less East African admixture.
To adopt an element, things like assimilation and integration need to take place. Bantu immigration hypothesis was pure immigration rather than the sense of conquest.
Another thing, If History of French language and one of English were unknown(like one of Bantu languages)
These languages were gonna be grouped together.
French and English share a lot more than IsiXhosa and Gikuyu.
“Bantu immigration” is not a chapter for school nor on any “school” curriculum. It remains a hypothesis like other pre-historical immigrations.
One of the key challenges to concluding with “Bantu immigration” is uncertainty regarding the Proto-Bantu language.
isiZulu is mostly used as a reference, despite being a sub-group of Nguni languages that originated in South Africa.
On genetics, Bantu-speakers are more genetically diverse than the entire continent of Europe. They may share a common paternal lineage (which also varies), but you cannot conclude by grouping them as one ethnic group.
I find it extremely skewed how Indians and Europeans are not grouped together despite sharing a common paternal lineage (Haplogroup R1a) and the same language family, Indo-European languages.
47
I find it extremely dumb to consider BaKongo (the biggest slave traders) as “Southern Africans”. BaKongo were concentrated in Northern Angola and both Congos.
First of all, they are grouped as Central Bantu-speaking not Southern Africa.
Secondly, Angola , by the definition of United Nations, is part of Central Africa.
Geography is rather politically than viewing it one sided.
These Neo-marxists are so weird,
I’m not gonna lie.
They present themselves as “Marxists” while they are spiritually fascist.
Luke retweeted
They both share the same last name (Huang). In my culture, this is forbidden. A profound taboo akin to incest itself (regardless of whether or not we're actually related). My clan elders would find it significantly easier to accept a bride from Ulan Bataar or Timbuktu than a girl with the same last name as I.
Luke retweeted
“Bantu immigration” is not a chapter for school nor on any “school” curriculum. It remains a hypothesis like other pre-historical immigrations.
One of the key challenges to concluding with “Bantu immigration” is uncertainty regarding the Proto-Bantu language.
isiZulu is mostly used as a reference, despite being a sub-group of Nguni languages that originated in South Africa.
On genetics, Bantu-speakers are more genetically diverse than the entire continent of Europe. They may share a common paternal lineage (which also varies), but you cannot conclude by grouping them as one ethnic group.
I find it extremely skewed how Indians and Europeans are not grouped together despite sharing a common paternal lineage (Haplogroup R1a) and the same language family, Indo-European languages.
“Bantu immigration” is not a chapter for school nor on any “school” curriculum. It remains a hypothesis like other pre-historical immigrations.
One of the key challenges to concluding with “Bantu immigration” is uncertainty regarding the Proto-Bantu language.
isiZulu is mostly used as a reference, despite being a sub-group of Nguni languages that originated in South Africa.
On genetics, Bantu-speakers are more genetically diverse than the entire continent of Europe. They may share a common paternal lineage (which also varies), but you cannot conclude by grouping them as one ethnic group.
I find it extremely skewed how Indians and Europeans are not grouped together despite sharing a common paternal lineage (Haplogroup R1a) and the same language family, Indo-European languages.
