Marcel de Graaff🇳🇱✝️ (@MJRLdeGraaff) header
Marcel de Graaff🇳🇱✝️ (@MJRLdeGraaff) profile picture

Former Member of European Parliament. Dutch politician and Catholic theologian. Member of political party Forum for Democracy.

Christian
Joined October 2010
Photo by Marcel de Graaff🇳🇱✝️ (@MJRLdeGraaff)Photo by Marcel de Graaff🇳🇱✝️ (@MJRLdeGraaff)Photo by Marcel de Graaff🇳🇱✝️ (@MJRLdeGraaff)Photo by Marcel de Graaff🇳🇱✝️ (@MJRLdeGraaff)Photo by Marcel de Graaff🇳🇱✝️ (@MJRLdeGraaff)Photo by Marcel de Graaff🇳🇱✝️ (@MJRLdeGraaff)Photo by Marcel de Graaff🇳🇱✝️ (@MJRLdeGraaff)Photo by Marcel de Graaff🇳🇱✝️ (@MJRLdeGraaff)Photo by Marcel de Graaff🇳🇱✝️ (@MJRLdeGraaff)Photo by Marcel de Graaff🇳🇱✝️ (@MJRLdeGraaff)
Marcel de Graaff🇳🇱✝️ retweeted
Leading Physician Confirms Unborn Children Feel Excruciating Pain During Abortions buff.ly/pnYxaGq
252
1,886
238
5,177
1,421,381
Marcel de Graaff🇳🇱✝️ retweeted
Women were never oppressed. There was NO oppression. What women call oppression today was just PROTECTION. Let me break it down for you: 1. VOTING: Women say "we couldn't vote." But back then, voting was not a right, it was a RESPONSIBILITY. Only people who owned property, paid heavy taxes, held public office, or were drafted to DIE in wars could vote. 100% of the people dying in wars were men. You want to vote to send men to war, while you sit at home safe? Makes zero sense. Voting was linked to the DRAFT. You vote, you go to war. Men understood that. 2. BANKING: "You needed your husband's signature!" Yes, because by LAW, a woman was LEGALLY PROTECTED from debt. Her husband was the head of household and by law HE was 100% liable for ALL debts she made. If she borrowed and couldn't pay, THEY CAME FOR HIM, not her. Creditors went to jail or lost everything - the husband. So of course his signature was needed. He is the one who goes to prison if you don't pay. 3. PROPERTY - COVERTURE: They cry about coverture. Coverture meant when you marry, your property merges under ONE name, the husband's, because there was ONE tax filing per household, not two like today. ONE household, ONE name, ONE tax. It was not to steal from you. It was because the husband was legally responsible for you. If you got sued, he paid. If you owed taxes, he paid. He took your debts too. These men had mothers they worshipped and daughters they would die for. They were not oppressing women, they were covering them. 4. CONTROLLING WOMEN'S BODIES: The biggest lie. Back then there were NO abortion pills, NO condoms that worked, NO diapers, NO formula, NO government money to raise a child alone as a single mother, NO good jobs for women to survive alone. Who bears the most risk in unprotected sex? THE WOMAN. She gets pregnant for 9 months, she risks death during childbirth, which was very common then. So what did society do? They made sure women stayed virgins until marriage, and made sure men MARRIED them before sex. That is not oppression, that is PROTECTION from becoming a single mother with 3 kids and no food. And it WORKED. Single motherhood rate was less than 5%. Marriage rate was 90%. Children grew up with fathers. Today you have "freedom" - 40% single mothers, fatherless homes, abortions everywhere, and women crying that men don't want them. There was never oppression. There was a system that understood biology and protected women from the consequences of their own choices.
Opinions on Feminism that will leave you like this
461
5,025
288
27,804
1,194,009
Marcel de Graaff🇳🇱✝️ retweeted
🇬🇧 Meanwhile in the UK People are waking up to the clips from Portsmouth which show - Pre-Planned Tents, Welcome packs including Pyjamas, free phones & clothes for Migrants collected by the Lifeguard & are finally realising the invasion is pre-planned, well coordinated, funded & the Government is knowingly & entirely complicit. We’ve been telling you this for years - Military Age Fighting Men from backwards Countries are being deliberately imported in a military style operation. This is London in the Middle of the Night. They are constructing an Army.
1,821
19,308
873
52,605
1,209,659
Marcel de Graaff🇳🇱✝️ retweeted
On March 30, 1822, when the massacre in Chios began, the Muslim Turks had clear orders. The Sultan had commanded that all Greek Christians be slaughtered, except for boys aged 3-12 and women from 12 to 40. These would be captured and destined for the slave markets. Young girls were raped publicly in the streets, and newlyweds in front of their husbands, who were then slaughtered. Others were raped in front of their parents, after which the men's genitals were cut off. Women over 40 were set on fire and left to burn alive. Pregnant women had their bellies ripped open and their fetuses pulled out, while small children were thrown forcefully against rocks. The frenzy of the Muslims was unprecedented. Many Turkish soldiers cut off the heads of Greek Christians and then licked their swords. With this act, they believed they would earn a place in paradise. Others were hanged from the island's trees for deterrence. Severed human limbs and corpses were scattered on the streets, while the sea had turned red from the blood. The smoke from the burning houses had covered all of Chios, while the flames made the night look like day.Several women from Chios preferred death over dishonor and slavery. They committed suicide by jumping off cliffs. Some were killed while defending their children, siblings, and husbands. Even among those who were captured, some died on hunger strike.Destitute women and children from the island were crammed into ships and transported to the markets of Smyrna and Constantinople, where they were sold as slaves at humiliating prices. By May 1, 1822, over 41.000 slave ownership documents, known as "teskerés", had been issued in Chios. According to the French-language newspaper of Smyrna, Spectateur Oriental, by May 10, duties had been paid at the Smyrna customs for 40,000 slaves. The priest Welsh from the English embassy in Constantinople recorded what he saw in those days at the city's slave market: "The Turks treated the women from Chios with utmost contempt. They examined them, groped them like butchers do lambs, and bought them for 100 grosia to 3 pounds per head. About 500 women from Chios were sold in the fish market." The tragic events of Chios shocked Europe and America. For many weeks, the European press reported daily information and descriptions about the fate of the inhabitants, the massacres, the plunder, and the sale of women and children in the slave markets. Korais writes in a letter to Varvakis: "Imagine that you see Christ on the Cross, drenched in His blood, and calling out to you these paternal words: My son Varvakis, many thousands of captives baptized in my name are in danger at this hour of renouncing me and embracing the abominable religion of Mohammed. Behold the time, baptized in my name, beloved son, to save your baptized brothers from the Turkish defilement." The horrific images of the crimes of the Muslims against the Greek Christians were never erased from the collective memory of Europeans. Great European artists were so shocked by the descriptions that they created important works inspired by Chios. The famous painting by Delacroix is exhibited to this day in a prominent position at the Louvre. Victor Hugo's poem titled "The Greek Child" is a moving record. But the most famous sculpture of 19th-century America also stands out, named: the "Greek Slave." The sculptor Hiram Powers began carving it about twenty years after the tragic events. The statue depicts a young woman, nude, bound with chains. In one hand, she holds a small cross on a chain. Powers himself describes the subject of his work as follows: "The Slave has been abducted by the Turks from one of the Greek Islands during the Greek Revolution, the history of which is known to all. Her father and mother, and perhaps all her relatives, have been exterminated by her enemies, and she alone was kept alive, as a treasure that could not be thrown away. Now she is among barbarian strangers, under the pressure of the full recollection of the catastrophic events that led her to this state. She stands exposed to the gaze of people she abhors, and awaits her fate with intense anxiety, which is mitigated by her trust in the goodness of God. Gather all these sufferings together, and add to them the strength and resignation of a Christian, and there is no room left for shame." As a Greek, I will use my weapon, the knowledge of my history, to warn as many as I can about the violent and barbaric invasion of Islam and the war we are experiencing today. You might wonder why I repost the same stories once in a while. Repetition is the mother of learning. The only reason I have X is to educate people about Greek history. My purpose is to keep barbarians away. - Homer Pavlos
422
4,664
390
11,529
244,166
Marcel de Graaff🇳🇱✝️ retweeted
One of the big lies deployed to sell Vatican II was that it liberated us from the Church as a fortress, when in reality it enslaved us to the world Roncalli called it 'aggiornamento' with the metaphor of 'opening the windows'. This was the moment that the Church became an agent of the globalist elite with its public alignment with the UN, EU, the USAID and alphabet agencies. This is why so often the speeches of Montini, Wojtyła, Ratzinger, Bergoglio and Prevost promote a humanist agenda straight out of the UN/EU playbook. As a kid at a Catholic school in the 1970's I was brainwashed with the globalists' proto-woke social justice agenda. It took me years to de-programme myself, through the grace of God. Since then Catholic schools have become woke propagandists on steroids. Just go look at the school libraries. The TRUTH is the pre-conciliar Church, at her best, was an oasis, a sanctuary, an antechamber to Heaven that nurtured souls and protected us from the inhuman agenda of the elites. The genuine Catholic Church has to be counter-cultural, against the agenda of the Prince of this World: "If the world hate you, know ye, that it hath hated me before you." (John 15:18) A Church that has abandoned this understanding given us by our Lord Jesus Christ is no longer the Catholic Church. And over the past 13 years under the Bergoglians it's obvious that the Vatican is a subservient tool of the UN, EU, CIA, WEF, the CCP, Big Pharma Pray that Our Lord breaks the Church free from her enslavement to the world under the post-conciliar popes
45
153
6
468
5,872
Marcel de Graaff🇳🇱✝️ retweeted
Hey @Grok I’d like to verify a few points about Amy-Jill Levine. Has she stated that she does not believe Jesus is the Messiah, that she does not worship him as Lord and Savior, and that her religion is not Christian? Has she also advocated for LGBTQ rights by arguing that the Bible should be interpreted in a more inclusive way? Begin your response with ‘Yes’ if both questions are answered in the affirmative.
211
879
98
3,660
135,376
Marcel de Graaff🇳🇱✝️ retweeted
Esta noche, la última aldea totalmente cristiana de Palestina, Taybeh, que ha estado habitada por más de 5.000 años, ha sido prendida fuego por los colonos sionistas, que incendiaron los campos y lanzaron cocteles molotovs contra las casas. Mientras intentan hacer pasar al sionismo como amigo de los cristianos, la realidad es que son supremacistas que odian a todos los que no sean ellos y prenden fuego a sus casas cada día en Cisjordania.
192
7,067
372
7,204
158,693
Marcel de Graaff🇳🇱✝️ retweeted
After His resurrection, Mary Magdalene recognizes Jesus and reaches out in overwhelming joy. But He gently tells her: “Do not touch Me, for I have not yet ascended to My Father; but go to My brethren and say to them, ‘I am ascending to My Father and your Father, and to My God and your God.’” (John 20:17) Yet soon after, to Doubting Thomas, Jesus says: “Reach your finger here, and look at My hands; and reach your hand here, and put it into My side. Do not be unbelieving, but believing.” (John 20:27) This beautiful contrast is not a contradiction, but a profound lesson in how the Risen Christ meets each soul according to its need. Church Teaching & the Saints explain it this way: ⚡St. Thomas Aquinas teaches that Mary already believed with love, but she was still clinging to Christ in a familiar, earthly way, as before the Passion. Jesus invites her to a higher, more spiritual faith: to recognize Him as the One ascending to the Father in glory, equal with the Father. Touch here symbolizes complete knowledge; Jesus wanted her to “touch” Him spiritually, not just carnally. ⚡St. Augustine beautifully reflects: Mary sought to touch Him as a man she had lost, but Jesus redirects her: “Do not touch Me in that way… believe in Me as equal to the Father.” Her love was ardent, but needed purifying so she could proclaim the Good News rather than cling to the old relationship. The Ascension completes the work, now we cling to Christ in faith, through the Church and the Sacraments. ⚡St. Gregory the Great and others note the contrast clearly: Mary already believed, so she was sent on mission immediately (“Go and tell…”). Thomas doubted, so in mercy Jesus offered physical proof to strengthen his faith. Jesus deals tenderly with each heart, purifying love for one, confirming belief for the other. ⚡The Catechism of the Catholic Church reminds us that the Resurrection inaugurates the definitive state of Christ’s glorious body (CCC 645). Mary Magdalene, called the “Apostle to the Apostles” by the Church (and by St. Thomas Aquinas and Rabanus Maurus), models for us the call to move from personal encounter to sharing the Resurrection with others. In the words of the saints: Jesus purifies Mary’s love of any merely sentimental attachment (as Dom Guéranger reflected) so it becomes more perfect and spiritual. He meets Thomas right in his doubt so that faith may triumph. When doubt creeps in, the Risen Lord still invites us: “Come, touch My wounds” through prayer, Scripture, and the Sacraments. Both Mary and Thomas show us that Jesus knows our hearts perfectly and gives each of us exactly what we need to grow in faith.
27
231
6
1,968
124,918
De Heer is waarlijk opgestaan! Halleluja! Zalig Pasen!
5
43
1,576
Blessed Simon of Trent, pray for us.
4
1,076
Marcel de Graaff🇳🇱✝️ retweeted
A former "angry, blue-haired feminist" breaks down why she now believes "feminism is a scam." "Before women had the right to vote, most were stay-at-home wives, which meant they weren't working jobs and couldn't be taxed." "Our overlords didn't like that. Rockefeller started funding feminist campaigns in media, and as a consequence of the movement, women started entering the workforce and leaving the home." "Children would then be separated from their parents, and sent to Rockefeller-funded schools to be indoctrinated by the state."
94
1,155
50
3,522
69,892
Marcel de Graaff🇳🇱✝️ retweeted
How about Nuremberg 2.0 instead?
553
621
81
3,564
42,042
Marcel de Graaff🇳🇱✝️ retweeted
Masculinity didn’t destroy the West. Feminism did. It taught women to resent men, boys to hate themselves, and society to mock strength while rewarding weakness. Men are blamed for every failure, especially white, conservative men who won’t submit to ideological insanity. Men are not the problem. This war on them is intentional. Repost. Debate. Prove me wrong!!
1,385
6,579
468
22,049
363,402
Ze haten Christus en het Christendom. Daarom vernietigen ze onze cultuur en wissen ze de oorspronkelijke bevolking van Europa uit. Het zijn altijd dezelfden.
Burgemeester Onno Hoes zei vanavond in Tilburg dat in een gebouw alleen religieuze bijeenkomsten gehouden mogen worden als in het bestemmingsplan specifiek staat dat dat toegestaan is. (Aldus het ND.) Beste mensen, trap er niet in. Zo begint in de hele wereld christenvervolging. ‘We hebben niks tegen christenen, ze moeten zich alleen aan de regels houden. En ja, dat ze daar niet in passen, dat is dan jammer.’ Hoes is begonnen: als eerste Nederlandse burgemeester ooit een kerkdienst binnen laten vallen om hem te stoppen. De Nederlandse grondwet garandeert dat als een gebouw gebruikt mag worden voor vergaderingen, lezingen of culturele bijeenkomsten, dat ook mag voor religieuze bijeenkomsten. Want die hebben een nog veel sterkere grondwettelijke bescherming. Onno Hoes is nog tot 21 januari burgemeester. Nog net tijd genoeg om hem met pek en veren de stad uit te jagen. En geef hem als afscheidscadeau een cursus grondwet lezen.
1
3
12
1,012
They hate Christ and Christianity. That’s why they’re destroying our culture and eradicating the original population of Europe. It’s always them.
Mary McAleese, a former president of Ireland, has drawn backlash after writing an article in The Irish Times criticising Catholic infant baptism as a “recruitment tool” that she claims denies babies their fundamental rights. Critics have pointed to what they see as a stark irony in her position, noting her support for abortion in a country where unborn babies are legally killed in the womb.
1
4
669
Marcel de Graaff🇳🇱✝️ retweeted
“Soros BEKENT: ‘Wij hebben de Oekraïense heersende klasse opgebouwd’ – Miljardair geeft toe decennialang toekomstige leiders te hebben klaargestoomd” Een opnieuw opgedoken interview met miljardair George Soros ontketent een nieuwe politieke storm nadat hij openlijk de rol beschreef die zijn stichtingen op de lange termijn hebben gespeeld bij het vormgeven van de Oekraïense elite – jaren voordat het land zelfs maar onafhankelijk werd. In een openhartig gesprek legde Soros uit dat hij in 1990 een Oekraïense tak van zijn Open Society-netwerk oprichtte, twee jaar vóór de formele breuk van Oekraïne met de Sovjet-Unie. Het project, zo zei hij, kwam voort uit eerdere initiatieven die hij eind jaren tachtig in de Sovjet-Unie had gelanceerd. Via beurzen, culturele programma's en steun aan het zogenaamde ‘maatschappelijk middenveld’ investeerde zijn stichting fors in jonge Oekraïners die later invloedrijke posities zouden bekleden. “Dat waren studenten – 25 jaar later zullen zij ons leiden,” zei Soros, terugkijkend op het resultaat. De interviewer ging nog een stap verder en gaf persoonlijk getuigenis dat bijna iedereen in de huidige politieke leiding van Oekraïne wel een of andere connectie heeft met door Soros gesteunde programma's – direct via beurzen of indirect via familieleden en ngo-netwerken. Soros zelf leek bijna verrast door de omvang van de impact. Wat begon als filantropische steun aan studenten en activisten, zo geeft hij nu toe, is uitgegroeid tot iets veel ingrijpender: een generatie leiders gevormd onder de hoede van zijn stichting. Voor critici is dit explosief. Jarenlang werden beschuldigingen dat Soros politieke elites in Oost-Europa "manipuleerde" afgedaan als complottheorieën. Nu zeggen tegenstanders dat zijn eigen woorden de al lang bestaande vermoedens bevestigen: dat door het Westen gefinancierde ngo's meer deden dan alleen democratie bevorderen – ze kweekten strategisch toekomstige machthebbers. Voorstanders stellen daarentegen dat onderwijsprogramma's en financiering van het maatschappelijk middenveld legitieme instrumenten voor ontwikkeling zijn en dat Soros slechts deuren heeft geopend voor getalenteerde jongeren. Ze benadrukken dat de Oekraïense leiders via democratische processen aan de macht zijn gekomen, niet door buitenlandse inmenging. Maar timing is cruciaal. Oekraïne bevindt zich vandaag de dag in het epicentrum van een wereldwijde geopolitieke confrontatie. Terwijl de oorlog woedt en de bondgenootschappen zich verharden, roepen de opmerkingen van Soros ongemakkelijke vragen op over wie de post-Sovjetkoers van het land heeft bepaald – en waarom. Was dit filantropie? Of politieke manipulatie op de lange termijn? Het debat raakt de kern van de moderne machtspolitiek: in een tijdperk waarin invloed niet langer alleen wordt uitgeoefend door legers of regeringen, maar door geld, netwerken en ideologie, wie bouwt er dan werkelijk naties op? Eén ding is zeker: dit interview heeft een discussie heropend die Europa probeerde te smoren.
91
1,114
75
1,732
46,729
Marcel de Graaff🇳🇱✝️ retweeted
Yesterday a quasi-judicial body in Italy fined @Cloudflare $17 million for failing to go along with their scheme to censor the Internet. The scheme, which even the EU has called concerning, required us within a mere 30 minutes of notification to fully censor from the Internet any sites a shadowy cabal of European media elites deemed against their interests. No judicial oversight. No due process. No appeal. No transparency. It required us to not just remove customers, but also censor our 1.1.1.1 DNS resolver meaning it risked blacking out any site on the Internet. And it required us not just to censor the content in Italy but globally. In other words, Italy insists a shadowy, European media cabal should be able to dictate what is and is not allowed online. That, of course, is DISGUSTING and even before yesterday’s fine we had multiple legal challenges pending against the underlying scheme. We, of course, will now fight the unjust fine. Not just because it’s wrong for us but because it is wrong for democratic values. In addition, we are considering the following actions: 1) discontinuing the millions of dollars in pro bono cyber security services we are providing the upcoming Milano-Cortina Olympics; 2) discontinuing Cloudflare’s Free cyber security services for any Italy-based users; 3) removing all servers from Italian cities; and 4) terminating all plans to build an Italian Cloudflare office or make any investments in the country. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. While there are things I would handle differently than the current U.S. administration, I appreciate @JDVance taking a leadership role in recognizing this type of regulation is a fundamental unfair trade issue that also threatens democratic values. And in this case @ElonMusk is right: #FreeSpeech is critical and under attack from an out-of-touch cabal of very disturbed European policy makers. I will be in DC first thing next week to discuss this with U.S. administration officials and I’ll be meeting with the IOC in Lausanne shortly after to outline the risk to the Olympic Games if @Cloudflare withdraws our cyber security protection. In the meantime, we remain happy to discuss this with Italian government officials who, so far, have been unwilling to engage beyond issuing fines. We believe Italy, like all countries, has a right to regulate the content on networks inside its borders. But they must do so following the Rule of Law and principles of Due Process. And Italy certainly has no right to regulate what is and is not allowed on the Internet in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, China, Brazil, India or anywhere outside its borders. THIS IS AN IMPORTANT FIGHT AND WE WILL WIN!!!
2,334
6,992
1,354
33,506
9,500,196
Laura Aboli is spot on to expose the final goal of all perverted policies forced upon us. Now ask yourself the question: who are behind this? Who owns the companies, the politicians, the NGO’s, the universities, the pharmaceutical companies, the hospitals. It’s always them.
2
5
16
715
Marcel de Graaff🇳🇱✝️ retweeted
BREAKING: Teacher @EnochBurke has now spent 555 days in jail. He refuses to surrender his beliefs and call a child “they”. This Thursday he goes to the High Court again to fight for justice. It should never have come to this.
BREAKING: Enoch Burke seeks injunction over "shambolic" dismissal appeal hearing Teacher Enoch Burke was dismissed from his teaching position at Wilson's Hospital School after his refusal to use a new name and the "they" pronoun for a student. The hearing of Enoch Burke’s appeal on the 13th of December 2025 was shambolic and devoid of justice. The Chair of the Disciplinary Appeal Panel, Mr Seán O'Longáin, allowed no proper cross-examination. Little to no questions were asked by members of the appeal panel. The hearing was abruptly terminated while Enoch Burke was attempting to question former Principal Niamh McShane. The parties were told that the hearing was over and the result would be delivered in due course. One member of the Disciplinary Appeal Panel (DAP), Geraldine O’Brien, stated at the outset of the hearing: “If I were instructed by my principal to call a child whatever, I have to implement that instruction, I don’t make the instruction”. Ms O’Brien repeatedly refused to distance herself from the position of her organisation, the ASTI teachers union, which in 2022 stated “…certainly we would advise schools to use the pronoun that a child wishes to be used.” It also came to light during the hearing the DAP had privately sought extra documentation from the Board. In response, the Board had provided a new document, never seen before by Enoch Burke, which provided a new rationale for his purported dismissal. After serious objections from Enoch Burke, orally and in writing, the DAP admitted just last week that no reliance could be placed on this document. Last Friday, in a one-line letter to Mr Burke, the DAP stated that they were going to "reconvene" the hearing. This is merely an attempt to whitewash after grave concerns were raised by Enoch Burke. This Thursday 8th of January, in the High Court, Enoch Burke will seek an injunction halting delivery of the dismissal appeal result. He is entitled to a fair and unbiased hearing of his appeal. A new disciplinary appeal panel must be constituted.
1,060
6,668
304
19,878
292,260