One thing I'd look at before jumping into any NFT project launch
Who is going to want this NFT after the mint is over
Not just people looking to make a quick flip
I'd want to know what makes the collection worth holding, what keeps people interested when sales slow down and how the project plans to attract new buyers without relying on hype every time.
The art might get people through the door but what happens next is a different game
I've got a few ideas on how projects can approach this differently
Getting early access to @LebrelAI: private, uncensored AI through chat and API.
Join with my invite link: early.lebrel.ai/r/Q73TB2 xitter.cf/LebrelAI/status/211222…
The Lebrel waitlist is live.
We’re building private, uncensored AI for researchers, developers, and creators who want more freedom and control.
Private beta is coming soon.
Join the waitlist: early.lebrel.ai/
Imagine say a whole civilization dey live on one island
The murmlings dey learn, evolve, create their own language form beliefs and interact with everybody watching them
And the funny thing be say you fit actually interact with them lol.
Honestly, this one make more sense to me pass all these usual AI metas wey everybody dey do
Zero knowledge proofs are the short version of the rule: prove the useful fact, keep the rest private.
I slept more than 7 hours without the bedtime. Over 18 without the birth date. “This payment is funded,” without linking it to you. The other side checks a small proof. They never see the input.
Your fitness agent gets a recovery threshold, not the sleep log. Your shopping agent gets a budget constraint, not the full history. Last Tuesday stays yours unless the task actually needs it.
Same as good Web3 design. Unlimited approvals are the bad pattern. A scoped proof is the better one.
The catch: a proof shows the math was done right. It does not show the inputs were true. Garbage in, valid proof out.
Not the agent that ingested your life. The agent that can accept a proof and still be useful
INJ ETF update
@injective CEO Eric Chen says 2027 is too far away for U.S. INJ ETFs.
Two ETFs are already in the works 21Shares and Canary.
Honestly, this is pretty exciting Injective is getting deeper into traditional finance and things seem to be moving faster than expected.
Mavo retweeted
Why should a GPU sit idle when someone else needs the compute ?
That’s the part of @YOM_Official I find interesting.
YOM connects spare GPU capacity with real-time workloads across AI, gaming and streaming, so existing hardware can be useful beyond its primary owner.
The real test is execution: can YOM make distributed GPUs feel as usable as a single source of compute ?
$YOM is available on MEXC.
🤝 Paid partnership
A few projects I’ve come across recently that are worth keeping an eye on
• @playhunchxyz Prediction markets on Base
• @PantheonInc Robotics
• @_gossipRH AI-agent market intelligence
• @alkanesfun Bitcoin token launchpad
• @Raflux_io Onchain trading cards
• @DashXHQ Payments for freelancers
No calls just sharing what’s on my radar.
DYOR
I don't think you're overthinking it the memecoin part sounds crazy now but if tokenized stocks actually get big someone eventually has to explain who controls all those votes.
That’s a much bigger deal than whether retail gets the stock exposure in my view.
In 2021, retail bought $GME because the mechanism was simple.
Short interest was 140% of float.
You squeeze, shorts have to cover, price goes up.
Retail vs hedge funds.
Clear villain, clear play.
What's happening with Robinhood's tokenized stock meta in 2026 is mechanically different in a way that almost nobody's talking about.
When you buy a tokenized stock on Robinhood, here's what you're actually buying
> A debt security.
> Economic exposure to the stock's price movement.
> You get dividends passed through.
... But you don't get the vote.
Robinhood holds the actual shares as collateral. Tenev was on CNBC this week and couldn't answer who votes those shares.
The original meme stock thesis was "give retail more power."
If the platform accumulates the actual shareholder voting rights while retail holds the economic exposure wrapper, the infrastructure layer ends up with more institutional power than the hedge funds retail was fighting in 2021.
Not an accusation.
Just a structural observation.
Now what I have started to find VERY interesting here, Nasdaq's tokenized stocks through Kraken will carry voting rights.
That's a different product entirely.
The question that matters for the next 3-5 years: as tokenized equities scale, does the voting rights question become the defining issue?
Or does retail not actually care about governance and just want the price exposure? The funny name? The tied pair to the equity assets?
I lean toward "retail doesn't care yet, but will care when it matters."
That's usually when a major corporate vote goes the platform's way. Or what could be even CRAZIER is if a memecoin tied to a stock, that holds an ABSURD amount of the stock, can significantly sway a serious vote for the publicly traded company...
Am I overthinking this or does the voting rights architecture actually matter?
Mavo retweeted
Every rig owns a wallet.
What ends up in it isn't rock and it doesn't have to
stay on Robinhood Chain. The seam runs to Bitcoin.
Free mint, sealed until reveal → hoodminer.live




















