Can’t believe it’s been a month and this moron still doesn’t get it
Can’t believe it’s been one month now! Day 31 of asking: Media, why aren’t any of YOU asking why the Premier League refuses to release the names of the “independent” commission? You have two weeks of International break to do your job and find out.
@slbsn
@KevinP184
@KieranMaguire
1
28
Imagine thinking it’s a real show 😂
Channel 4 is airing a show where ordinary people stake their own real money on a quiz while millions are struggling through a cost of living crisis. Bradley Walsh’s Million Pound Shot isn’t “entertainment” — it’s tone-deaf, exploitative television that normalises gambling at the worst possible time. #MillionPoundShot
126
Day 20 of this bot account posting the same old AI guff not realising he hasn’t got a clue what he’s actually asking
DAY 20: Question for the media: Why aren’t any of YOU asking why the Premier League refuses to release the names of the “independent” commission members?
Transparency works both ways. Why the silence on this?
#MediaBias
#mancity
#premierleague
43
Looks like it’s absolutely a gotcha seen as he’s blocked me. These city bot accounts are hilarious
58
United fans are fully with you in this campaign
Replying to @JacobsBen
After city’s case is done. United need to be looked into.
£1billion debt should NOT be allowed to happen.
151
The state of this 😂😂😂 Some whopper from Illinois thinking he has a divine right to know
It’s day 7 of me asking all media to simply ask this question. Which outlet will stand up and demand transparency? @Jack_Gaughan @SamLee
128
I think it’s time United fans consider contacting the IFR and putting pressure on them to remove the Glazers
Independent Football Regulator chief executive Richard Monks: 'If we determine an owner is unsuitable, then we would require them to sell the club within a particular timeframe.
'If they can’t do that in a particular timeframe, then we would effectively appoint a third party to sell the club on their behalf.'
88
These fake paid city accounts are dangerous, convincing city fans with false information. This section is on page 24 of the decision under the heading “Submissions of the parties - The Appealant” - This was part of citys claim to CAS, not CAS decision - tas-cas.org/generated/assets…
1
134
Guillem Ballbag does it again, maybe if his tongue wasn’t so far up pep’s ricker he wouldn’t talk so much shit
I watched the F1 film with Brad Pitt the other day, and there’s a moment where his character asks to add something to the car that isn’t really in the rules. The FIA punishes it, but the team can still race with the earlier car. It made me think.
In F1, the best teams live at the edge of the regulations. Sometimes the FIA allows what they’ve found, and sometimes it says that goes too far. Occasionally the rules are rewritten afterwards.
Now, City. I’m not defending them. A commission found they entered into sham agreements and broke the spending limits. A sham is an arrangement that isn’t what it claims to be, so that’s a different thing from using a gap nobody had spotted.
City deny it and will appeal. But I find it useful to ask/reflect on how people inside the club see it.
From their point of view, PERHAPS they believe they were doing what elite competitors do: looking at the rules, finding the limits, challenging interpretations and moving faster than the regulatory system.
From the outside, you might look at that and say, “That’s cheating.” From inside the organisation, they might say, “We found something nobody had thought of.”
If you believe you’ve found a way to bring money in, more or less within the rules (and the commission said it was not in the rules and it was cheating), you might tell yourself you’re just being a sharp competitor.
We are all asking “did City cheat?”. But I find this question interesting too: “how did City come to believe they weren’t?”
And understanding a mindset, or trying to, isn’t excusing it.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Manchester City were found guilty of 114 out of 115 charges by an independent commission. The comparison made is not in the same ball park to the level of rule breaking Man City have committed.
premierleague.com/en/news/472777…
35
But even if I have killed someone, how do we know you haven’t killed someone too
If Manchester United’s entire history was put under the same microscope City have been under for the last decade, I genuinely wonder how comfortable their fans would still be screaming “CHEATS.”
That’s the conversation nobody wants.
66
This is why Americans shouldn’t get involved in football conversations. “Create new big clubs” - Like the premier league just chose for Liverpool, United and Arsenal to have huge fanbases
Replying to @MancJohnson @GYMLFC
The PL is bigger than these clubs and could create new big clubs but rules don’t allow it.
Since only the red clubs and Chelsea can win, hard for others to build a big global fan base?
1
84
What happened in the 115 hearing when city tried to bully the premier league
This quoted post is unavailable.
150
Application for Turnstile Operator Role - Name - John T. Urnstile - (Photo included below)
Previous Role - Man City
Reason for Leaving - Red Cartel 😭
💼❓ “People will lose jobs… what about John who works the turnstiles?”
🙄 “Oh Do Me A FAVOUR!”
Man City fan Steven McInerney and Piers Morgan CLASH over club workers losing jobs if City were relegated.
📺 youtu.be/y7VPogOtYM0
@piersmorgan | @StevenMcinerney
247

























