Doncs res, ja tenim el @Liceu_cat , defensor de les arts escèniques, de la música, del bell canto fent el ridícul i menystenint les arts que no li són pròpies. Retallem en fotografia, disseny, il·lustració o cinema.
Visca la IA
MMC retweeted
¡En Artemis II no tiene una sola cámara NIKON D5, sino 3! (Otro hilo para fotógrafos y bueno, quien se interese)
Les cuento que he estado revisando la secuencia de las fotos tomadas por la tripulación del ARTEMIS II y he encontrado que están usando al menos 3 cámaras Nikon D5, cada una con diferente lente. El kit comleto de lentes con los que sueña cualquier astrofotógrafo. jaja Se los explicaré en el siguiente hilo.... Comienzo por la foto que más me ha gustado de todo el viaje. Es mi número 1. Esta foto fue tomada anoche con un lente NIKON 80 - 400mm en su distancia focal mínima, es decir 80mm. Su número de archivo termina en 9287 y fue tomada a las 10:41 p.m. Y se viene lo interesante...(Les muestro los lentes en el último trino)
Hola @bankrobberbcn
que passa amb els sirles a Spotify? Les cançons no estan disponibles!
Trist i cert
Last quarter I rolled out Microsoft Copilot to 4,000 employees.
$30 per seat per month.
$1.4 million annually.
I called it "digital transformation."
The board loved that phrase.
They approved it in eleven minutes.
No one asked what it would actually do.
Including me.
I told everyone it would "10x productivity."
That's not a real number.
But it sounds like one.
HR asked how we'd measure the 10x.
I said we'd "leverage analytics dashboards."
They stopped asking.
Three months later I checked the usage reports.
47 people had opened it.
12 had used it more than once.
One of them was me.
I used it to summarize an email I could have read in 30 seconds.
It took 45 seconds.
Plus the time it took to fix the hallucinations.
But I called it a "pilot success."
Success means the pilot didn't visibly fail.
The CFO asked about ROI.
I showed him a graph.
The graph went up and to the right.
It measured "AI enablement."
I made that metric up.
He nodded approvingly.
We're "AI-enabled" now.
I don't know what that means.
But it's in our investor deck.
A senior developer asked why we didn't use Claude or ChatGPT.
I said we needed "enterprise-grade security."
He asked what that meant.
I said "compliance."
He asked which compliance.
I said "all of them."
He looked skeptical.
I scheduled him for a "career development conversation."
He stopped asking questions.
Microsoft sent a case study team.
They wanted to feature us as a success story.
I told them we "saved 40,000 hours."
I calculated that number by multiplying employees by a number I made up.
They didn't verify it.
They never do.
Now we're on Microsoft's website.
"Global enterprise achieves 40,000 hours of productivity gains with Copilot."
The CEO shared it on LinkedIn.
He got 3,000 likes.
He's never used Copilot.
None of the executives have.
We have an exemption.
"Strategic focus requires minimal digital distraction."
I wrote that policy.
The licenses renew next month.
I'm requesting an expansion.
5,000 more seats.
We haven't used the first 4,000.
But this time we'll "drive adoption."
Adoption means mandatory training.
Training means a 45-minute webinar no one watches.
But completion will be tracked.
Completion is a metric.
Metrics go in dashboards.
Dashboards go in board presentations.
Board presentations get me promoted.
I'll be SVP by Q3.
I still don't know what Copilot does.
But I know what it's for.
It's for showing we're "investing in AI."
Investment means spending.
Spending means commitment.
Commitment means we're serious about the future.
The future is whatever I say it is.
As long as the graph goes up and to the right.
MMC retweeted
Last quarter I rolled out Microsoft Copilot to 4,000 employees.
$30 per seat per month.
$1.4 million annually.
I called it "digital transformation."
The board loved that phrase.
They approved it in eleven minutes.
No one asked what it would actually do.
Including me.
I told everyone it would "10x productivity."
That's not a real number.
But it sounds like one.
HR asked how we'd measure the 10x.
I said we'd "leverage analytics dashboards."
They stopped asking.
Three months later I checked the usage reports.
47 people had opened it.
12 had used it more than once.
One of them was me.
I used it to summarize an email I could have read in 30 seconds.
It took 45 seconds.
Plus the time it took to fix the hallucinations.
But I called it a "pilot success."
Success means the pilot didn't visibly fail.
The CFO asked about ROI.
I showed him a graph.
The graph went up and to the right.
It measured "AI enablement."
I made that metric up.
He nodded approvingly.
We're "AI-enabled" now.
I don't know what that means.
But it's in our investor deck.
A senior developer asked why we didn't use Claude or ChatGPT.
I said we needed "enterprise-grade security."
He asked what that meant.
I said "compliance."
He asked which compliance.
I said "all of them."
He looked skeptical.
I scheduled him for a "career development conversation."
He stopped asking questions.
Microsoft sent a case study team.
They wanted to feature us as a success story.
I told them we "saved 40,000 hours."
I calculated that number by multiplying employees by a number I made up.
They didn't verify it.
They never do.
Now we're on Microsoft's website.
"Global enterprise achieves 40,000 hours of productivity gains with Copilot."
The CEO shared it on LinkedIn.
He got 3,000 likes.
He's never used Copilot.
None of the executives have.
We have an exemption.
"Strategic focus requires minimal digital distraction."
I wrote that policy.
The licenses renew next month.
I'm requesting an expansion.
5,000 more seats.
We haven't used the first 4,000.
But this time we'll "drive adoption."
Adoption means mandatory training.
Training means a 45-minute webinar no one watches.
But completion will be tracked.
Completion is a metric.
Metrics go in dashboards.
Dashboards go in board presentations.
Board presentations get me promoted.
I'll be SVP by Q3.
I still don't know what Copilot does.
But I know what it's for.
It's for showing we're "investing in AI."
Investment means spending.
Spending means commitment.
Commitment means we're serious about the future.
The future is whatever I say it is.
As long as the graph goes up and to the right.
MMC retweeted
A Nano-Banana Mega Thread
It's been 24 hours since Google release Flash 2.5
But wait to you see all these crazy ways people are using it.
MMC retweeted
"A calculator app? Anyone could make that."
Not true.
A calculator should show you the result of the mathematical expression you entered. That's much, much harder than it sounds.
What I'm about to tell you is the greatest calculator app development story ever told.
MMC retweeted
114 million views in 7 days
> Historic really
> How did it happen? 🧵below 👇
Wed Nov 27 8.38 pm - The newly titled Dr Louks, posts the following after a verbal defense of her PhD thesis in Cambridge, England
teapawt.net/DrAllyLouks/status/186…
MMC retweeted
Bé, ja que la Mar no em respon, us explico per què construir amb contenidors marítims no (NO) és necessàriament sostenible ni eficient.
🧵
MMC retweeted
Ah, que lo leí ayer y se me olvidó comentarlo. La profesión médica tiene un papel importante en el caso Pelicot, no sólo porque no supieron identificar que Gisele estaba siendo drogada y violada, sino porque resulta que Dominique tenía cientos de recetas del fármaco que usaba +
MMC retweeted
Como cada año llega el último día de las vacaciones open.spotify.com/track/4XR2U…
MMC retweeted
💊 🏃♂️ QUÉ ES MÁS EFECTIVO PARA LA DEPRESIÓN O ANSIEDAD: ANTIDEPRESIVOS Vs CORRER
🧵 Este reciente estudio lo evalúa👇🏻
the train station has a mystery vending machine where you can buy whatever is in the unclaimed packages from delivery lockers
MMC retweeted
The untold story about the Star Trek communicator
First envisioned in 1964, The Communicator is hot potato now more than ever... wink wink Humane AI Pin...
Here is why
🧵 A thread































