Global Markets Strategist | Stocks & Crypto 📈 | CEX Industry Connections | Blockchain & Digital Assets | Market Research • Investment Insights
Wall Street | New York
Joined October 2011
- Tweets13.1K
- Following11
- Followers6.5K
- Likes238
This guy has lost his mind .
He is comparing $pi $xrp crypto-com-chain:native with $itlg
Must have lost his mind
He doesn’t even know what a blockchain is what tokenomics is .
He is a paid puppet of @inter_link and we all know that .
$itlg is distributed for making a post on X
$itlg was distributed to users for making a video
$itlg is at least 1.30 trillion in the market .
Is there anyone on X ?
Can someone teach @Time_and_Trade who is a paid puppet of @kv_interlink that $itlg is not a layer 1 coin and it is not even on chain yet and its supply is over 1 trillion and he is comparing with $xrp and $cro and $pi .
Just like comparing a donkey 🫏 with a horse 🐎.
This guy @Time_and_Trade promote 10 projects in one day just for few dollars and he is telling us about crypto .
Oh man
@Crypto_A_A @web3scraphunt
Evaluating Interlink Network ( $ITLG, $ITL )'s $ITLG token price by learning on the the price performances of Ripple ( $XRP ), Cronos ( crypto-com-chain:native ) and Pi Network ( $PI ) who also have the 100 Billion token supply as $ITLG.
From the price performances of $XRP, crypto-com-chain:native and $PI, we learned the followings:
1. Max supply matters less than circulating supply and unlocks.
$XRP has about 40% of its supply locked in escrow and released on a known schedule, so the market can plan for it.
$PI has only about 11% circulating, so roughly 89% could still reach the market as migration and lockups end. That steady selling pressure helps explain its fall.
2. A peak right at listing usually doesn’t hold.
$PI hit $2.99 days after its mainnet opened in February 2025. It has trended down ever since, as early miners with free coins sold.
This is the main lesson for $ITLG . When a “mined” token lists, many holders paid nothing for their coins and will take any price.
3. Changing the supply rules can damage trust.
In 2021, Crypto.com burned about 70% of CRO’s supply.
In 2025, a governance vote brought those 70 billion tokens back. Many holders were angry, and the price has never come close to its 2021 peak.
Lesson: check who controls the supply and whether the rules can change.
4. Real use and legal clarity hold value best.
$XRP has stayed in the dollar range thanks to:
years of exchange listings
payment-industry use
the end of the SEC case
Ripple getting a bank license
Even so, it is down about 64% from its peak.
$PI claims tens of millions of users, but the biggest exchanges still don’t list it.
5. Hype spikes fade.
crypto-com-chain:native jumped briefly on news of a partnership and ETF in 2025, then gave most of the gain back.
Rises driven by news alone rarely last.
6. Sell-offs hit hardest when big holders control the supply.
In all three coins, the company or core team holds a large share, through Ripple’s escrow, Crypto.com’s reserves and Pi’s Core Team allocation. What those holders do moves the price.
Bottom line: when you look at any new 100-billion-supply token, check these four things first:
- How much of the supply circulates at launch, and when the rest unlocks.
-Who controls the supply, and whether the rules can change.
-Which major exchanges list it.
-Whether people use it for anything besides holding it.
As far as $ITLG is concern, major advantages to boost price are:
-By the time Interlink Network lists $ITLG in 2027, interlink ecosytem should have lots of live uses for users.
-Interlink core team is consious about token releasing and plans for token buy back and burns. There should also be buying $ITLG from companies as treasury hold.
-Interlink team's dynamic management, great planning, fast implementation and popularity should attract tier 1 exchange listings.
-80% of $ITLG supply goes to verified users but the long vesting for $ITLG holders should soften the dump at listing that may hit priceI.
Since Interlink's objective is very similar to Pi Network's, we can predict $ITLG price by referencing $PI price. Since $PI's high and low prices are $2.99 and $0.071 respectively, $ITLG prices should be similar but better due to Interlink's well planned development and fast implentation.
What do you think?
#Interlink #ITLG #ITL #ITLXWallet #LinkersMap #InterlinkLiveStream #PrintMall #Web3 #DeFİ #Crypto #Payment #Gaming #dApp #SocialMining #ProofofPersonhood #POP #ATVQRPayment #InterlinkNameService #INS #10MUserMilestone #Web3 #BusinessToken #BT #RWA #DeFi #AI #Gaming #GlobalPayment #DEX #ReverseAuction #Layer1 #Crypto #BlockChain #EVM #Ethereum #Solidity #KYC #Bitflip #freecryptomining #mobilemining
Max Stone retweeted
🚨 YOU CALL IT COMPOUND INTEREST. I CALL IT COMPOUNDING UNANSWERED QUESTIONS.
Your strategy sounds impressive on paper. Stake $ITLG, earn more $ITLG, convert into $vITLG, lock it, receive $ITL, and repeat.
But there is one fundamental problem.
Where does the actual economic value come from?
Let me ask you some serious questions.
🔹 1. STAKING DOES NOT AUTOMATICALLY CREATE WEALTH.
If you stake 1 million tokens and receive another 100,000 tokens, you now have 1.1 million tokens.
But if those rewards increase circulating supply without corresponding demand, what exactly have you gained economically?
More tokens do not necessarily mean more purchasing power.
🔹 2. WHO IS FUNDING THESE REWARDS?
Are staking rewards generated through actual network revenue, transaction fees, business activity, or newly distributed tokens?
Because distributing additional tokens is not the same as generating profits.
🔹 3. RANDOMIZED CONVERSION IS NOT A GUARANTEED RETURN.
You mentioned maximizing randomized $ITLG-to-$vITLG conversion.
How can you calculate expected returns without knowing the conversion probabilities, allocation limits, and underlying economic mechanism?
Randomized rewards are not predictable compound interest.
🔹 4. LOCKING TOKENS DOES NOT CREATE MARKET DEMAND.
Locking $vITLG for 60 or 120 days might qualify you for additional $ITL rewards.
But who will purchase those $ITL tokens?
What creates sustainable demand?
What supports liquidity when participants eventually want to sell?
A lockup can delay selling pressure. It cannot eliminate economic reality.
🔹 5. BUYING FROM EARLY SELLERS INTRODUCES REAL FINANCIAL RISK.
Your originally mined tokens may have cost you no purchase price.
But the moment you start buying additional $ITLG from the market, you are putting actual money at risk.
What happens if the market value declines faster than your staking rewards accumulate?
🔹 6. SPONSORSHIP REWARDS REQUIRE ECONOMIC JUSTIFICATION.
If sponsors earn additional tokens, where does the value supporting those rewards originate?
Are they supported by genuine business activity, or primarily by expanding participation?
That distinction matters enormously.
💥 HERE IS THE BIGGEST QUESTION:
If everyone follows your strategy—staking everything, collecting rewards, converting tokens, and continuously reinvesting—who provides the external demand needed to turn those growing token balances into real economic value?
A system cannot become economically sustainable simply because everyone keeps accumulating its tokens.
Compound interest requires a measurable return. Token accumulation alone is not proof of compounding wealth.
I am not saying your strategy cannot work.
I am saying you have presented a sophisticated investment strategy without demonstrating its underlying economics.
Before encouraging others to follow it, show them the numbers, risks, reward sources, liquidity assumptions, and realistic downside scenarios.
Because there is a massive difference between accumulating millions of tokens and accumulating actual wealth.
@kv_interlink @inter_link @VyxCrypto629 @Crypto_A_A @web3scraphunt @reina_itl @chrisP_sible @SibleNetworkAI
@miratang16
🔍 Research. Question. Verify.
This is an economic critique, not financial advice or an allegation of wrongdoing.
Thank you for the update. I appreciate the effort being made to move ITLG KYC forward. However, I believe several important points need clarification before the portal opens.
I have some questions that I believe deserve clear answers for the entire community.
1. ITLG Allocation Formula
You mentioned that account metrics, badges, and ITL wallet balances will influence ITLG allocations.
Can you explain the actual allocation formula? What percentage of the allocation will depend on HCS, ACS, badges, ITL holdings, and sponsorship?
2. Fair Opportunity for New Accounts
If older accounts have stronger metrics, more badges, and larger ITL balances, how will new accounts realistically compete?
Does everyone have a guaranteed minimum allocation after successful KYC, or is allocation entirely performance-based?
3. ITL Holdings and ITLG Allocation
Why should holding more ITL improve someone’s chances of receiving ITLG?
Could this create an advantage for financially stronger participants over those who have contributed years of activity but hold little ITL?
4. AI-Based KYC Decisions
You mentioned using an AI model submitted to a US technology standards institute.
Will the AI independently determine eligibility and allocation, or will humans review disputed decisions?
What happens if a legitimate participant is incorrectly flagged?
5. Sponsorship and Allocation Bonuses
You mentioned that credible sponsors will improve KYC priority and ITLG allocation rates.
How exactly is sponsor credibility calculated?
Can someone with hundreds of sponsored accounts receive significantly more ITLG than a participant who has consistently contributed for years?
6. Transferable ITLG Rewards
Will ITLG received through sponsorship be immediately transferable, or will it have vesting or lockup requirements?
Will sponsorship rewards come from the existing distribution allocation or a separate reward pool?
7. Staking and vITLG
You mentioned that some staked ITLG will randomly become non-transferable vITLG.
Is this conversion permanent?
Will users have to consent before their transferable ITLG becomes non-transferable?
What additional benefits will vITLG provide to compensate for losing transferability?
8. ITLG Supply and Distribution
What is the total amount of ITLG allocated for this KYC round?
Will there be a maximum allocation per account?
Will the final distribution and allocation methodology be publicly auditable?
9. Unofficial Markets
If ITLG becomes transferable and unofficial markets emerge, what safeguards will protect users from scams and misleading prices?
Will the team provide clear information about official transfer mechanisms?
10. KYC for Children
How will identity verification work for participants under 16?
Will parental consent be mandatory, and how will children’s biometric and personal information be protected?
11. Existing Contributors
Many community members have spent years mining, maintaining streaks, improving their scores, and supporting the ecosystem.
How will the new allocation model recognise their historical contributions compared with newly registered accounts?
12. Final Question: Transparency
Before KYC opens, can the team publish a complete document explaining eligibility, allocation calculations, sponsorship rewards, appeals, staking, and vITLG conversion?
This would help eliminate confusion and allow everyone to participate with realistic expectations.
I believe transparency before distribution is far more important than explanations after distribution.
These questions are not criticism. They are intended to help the community understand the system and build confidence in a fair process.
Looking forward to your clarification.
For nearly the past year, a lot of false information has been spread about InterLink by people from other smaller projects or those who want to gain engagement by constantly linking InterLink’s name to negative matters and manipulating the community through negative narratives for views. However, I have always chosen to remain silent and focus quietly on building. I understand that if you want to become number one, you must be prepared to face false accusations. This is something that anyone who has reached the top of their field will experience, regardless of the industry.
Today is a beautiful and meaningful day. This is also a special week, as ITLG will officially enter its mainnet phase. I will take some time to share everything about @inter_link. I will not repeat these points again because I know that after this post, engagement farmers and haters will continue asking meaningless questions. That is their intention.
So, what does InterLink actually have? Before I share the full story, please allow me to make one point. We do not claim that we are the best. However, we have achieved and developed certain things that other projects may not be able to execute, including free-mining projects and projects that have raised hundreds of millions of dollars. If you know anyone who is doing better, please leave a comment. I am always willing to learn.
1. Founding Team
We are a group of leading professionals in finance and technology. Benjamin is the Chairman of a company currently listed on the New York Stock Exchange, the largest stock exchange in the world: nyse.com/quote/XASE:BESS. Vince is the Chairman of New To The Street, a leading Wall Street media company where many influential figures in the global financial industry gather. KV, which is me, studied at NUS, the National University of Singapore, which is the number one university in Asia, and I won a medal at the International Olympiad in Informatics. Finally, Kenny is the former Vice President of UFC Gym and holds both CPA and CFA qualifications.
2. InterLink and its AI model at NIST, the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology
face.nist.gov/frte/reportcar…. This is one of the leading human-focused AI models in the world, ranked 51st. Achieving this requires three things that only a small number of companies with substantial resources can possess: a highly capable team of engineers and researchers to develop the algorithms, a massive amount of training data accumulated over many years, and an annual investment of millions of U.S. dollars in NVIDIA H100 GPUs at that time. We had to submit evidence of all these capabilities to NIST and undergo a very rigorous evaluation process.
3. InterLink’s interview at the New York Stock Exchange
Being invited for an interview and welcomed with banners at the NYSE was not a paid promotion. We did not pay a single dollar to the NYSE or any of our other partners. Even if you were willing to spend several million dollars, you would never be featured or welcomed there if your project did not have strong technology and a strong team. We were interviewed there simply because we had a strong founding team and outstanding technology at that time. Even today, it is very difficult for leading crypto projects to gain access to such a platform. In addition, we are also proceeding with the audit requirements for listing.
4. Google for Startups and InterLink
We are one of the few startups in which Google holds an equity stake. Google supports us not only with cloud resources but also with funding for AI development and access to its extensive global network. You can verify this information through reputable platforms such as Crunchbase and CryptoRank.
5. A project from the U.S.
I have never claimed that InterLink is a U.S. project, even though most members of our founding team are U.S. citizens and both our headquarters and legal entities are based in the United States. I consider InterLink a global project. We recruit employees and establish offices in different parts of the world, including Singapore, Vietnam and possibly Hong Kong next. Whether a project comes from the U.S. does not mean much to me. Today, even the poorest countries in Africa have exceptionally talented individuals in academia and computer science.|
6. Fake-news claims that InterLink does not have a blockchain, that the entire ITLG supply has already been mined and that InterLink is not open-source
First, it is quite ridiculous to claim that InterLink does not have a blockchain. If InterLink had no blockchain, how could the current dApps deploy smart contracts, pay gas fees and track on-chain transactions from their own wallets? The InterLink Foundation is led by me and includes many talented engineers who previously worked with the Solana Foundation and Ethereum Foundation. They are not here simply to deploy an ordinary blockchain, which would take only a few days to one week to set up. We are building a blockchain with strong quantum resistance and best-in-class capacity to handle high transaction volumes. The project is not currently open-source because we need to complete our patent applications in the United States before making everything public and allowing everyone to review our core source code. As for ITLG, 55 billion tokens have currently been mined after deducting the tokens that were burned.
7. Working with OKX
Perhaps after Pi Network, InterLink is the second project in the free-mining sector to work directly with OKX and receive official confirmation from OKX. This is an important step in our process of working with market makers and liquidity providers to ensure the strongest possible intrinsic value for ITLG and ITL. In my view, OKX is one of the best exchanges today, with investment from the New York Stock Exchange.
We also have other partners, including Visa Card, WalletConnect and AWS, but the full list would be too long to include here. We are also focused on establishing ITL and ITLG treasury companies, with further announcements coming soon. This is what I wanted to share to put an end to the current rumours and strengthen the confidence of Linkers who have chosen to participate in and accompany @inter_link. Initially, I did not intend to publish any post because I wanted to focus fully on the project. However, some people told me that I should speak up so that everyone could have a clearer understanding. As for the haters and engagement farmers, I will completely ignore them. If you come across such accounts, please help me report them so that we can maintain a cleaner and healthier community.
Unverified rumors and negativity will only make the Linkers community stronger, more united, and more resilient. Now, let us welcome the ITLG Mainnet Era together.
Viva Linkers!
🚨 BEE NETWORK & RUBY NETWORK: SIX YEARS OF HOPE. BUT WHO IS ACTUALLY MAKING MONEY?
I have a serious question for the millions of people who have spent years tapping a button every day to collect digital coins.
Are you mining cryptocurrency, or are these companies mining YOU? 🧠
Let’s talk about Bee Network 🐝 and Ruby Network.
These projects have been around for years, and yet some of the most basic questions about their operations and token economics still deserve clear, verifiable answers.
❌ Where is the publicly verifiable blockchain?
❌ What is the confirmed total token supply?
❌ How many users have actually completed KYC?
❌ Who are the founders and people legally responsible for these projects?
❌ Where is the transparent roadmap with measurable deadlines?
❌ Where are the verified official X accounts and accountable leadership?
❌ When will users have unrestricted access to their coins?
❌ How much advertising revenue have these platforms generated?
Now think about something.
THEY CLAIM MILLIONS OF USERS.
Millions of people opening an application.
Millions of people watching advertisements.
Millions of people spending their time.
Millions of people inviting friends and family.
And millions of people hoping that one day those numbers on their screens will become something valuable.
But here’s the question nobody seems interested in answering.
💰 WHO IS GETTING PAID TODAY?
Advertising networks pay publishers for monetized impressions and other qualifying activity.
If these applications display revenue-generating advertisements, their operators may be earning money while users are still waiting for a way to realize value from their accumulated rewards.
And that’s where the business model deserves serious scrutiny.
YOU THINK YOU ARE MINING COINS.
BUT WHAT IF THE PLATFORM IS MINING YOUR ATTENTION?
Your daily activity creates engagement.
Your referrals bring more users.
Your attention creates advertising opportunities.
Your hope keeps you coming back tomorrow.
And tomorrow.
And tomorrow.
Six years can change someone’s entire life.
You could learn a valuable skill.
Build a business.
Develop a career.
Create something you actually own.
Instead, some people have spent years collecting digital numbers without knowing when, or whether, those numbers will become transferable assets.
⚠️ LET ME MAKE SOMETHING CLEAR.
I’m not claiming that Bee Network or Ruby Network have committed fraud. That requires evidence.
But I am saying that projects asking people for years of attention should be held accountable for transparency, verifiable progress, and realistic expectations.
A million users doesn’t automatically make a project successful.
A beautiful application doesn’t make it a blockchain.
A mining button doesn’t prove cryptocurrency is being mined.
And a promise of future value doesn’t make something valuable today.
🔥 THE MOST EXPENSIVE THING THESE PROJECTS MAY BE TAKING FROM YOU ISN’T MONEY.
It’s something you can never earn back.
YOUR TIME.
And the saddest part?
Some people have become so emotionally invested after years of tapping that they refuse to question the very platforms they’re supporting.
That’s not financial freedom.
That’s the danger of turning hope into a daily habit.
I want Bee Network and Ruby Network to succeed for their communities.
But after years of participation, users deserve more than promises.
They deserve answers.
MY QUESTION TO BEE NETWORK & RUBY NETWORK USERS:
After all these years, what have you actually received that you can independently verify, transfer, or use?
Not what you hope to receive tomorrow.
What have you received TODAY?
👇 Let’s have a serious discussion.
#BeeNetwork #RubyNetwork #CryptoMining #CryptoCommunity #Blockchain #CryptoAwareness #DeFi
🚨 CAN 10 MILLION PEOPLE BECOME MILLIONAIRES FROM ONE CRYPTOCURRENCY?
THE MATHEMATICS MIGHT SURPRISE YOU.
I’ve been studying cryptocurrency valuations, token distribution, and how wealth is created in financial markets.
And there’s one question I believe every crypto community should ask.
CAN AN ENTIRE COMMUNITY BECOME RICH FROM HOLDING THE SAME COIN?
Let’s do the mathematics.
Imagine a cryptocurrency project with:
🌍 10,000,000 users
🪙 100 BILLION total coins
💰 Every user dreams of becoming a millionaire.
Now assume the entire supply is distributed equally.
100 BILLION ÷ 10 MILLION = 10,000 COINS PER PERSON.
Sounds reasonable, right?
But here’s where things get interesting.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
📊 WHAT PRICE WOULD MAKE EVERY HOLDER A MILLIONAIRE?
If everyone holds 10,000 coins:
◆ At $1 = $10,000 per person
◆ At $10 = $100,000 per person
◆ At $50 = $500,000 per person
◆ At $100 = $1,000,000 per person
YES. AT $100 PER COIN, ALL 10 MILLION USERS WOULD THEORETICALLY BE MILLIONAIRES.
But wait.
WHO IS GOING TO BUY THOSE COINS AT $100?
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
🏦 NOW LET’S EXAMINE THE BIGGER PICTURE.
100 billion coins × $100
= $10,000,000,000,000
TEN TRILLION DOLLARS.
That’s the implied fully diluted valuation, assuming all 100 billion coins are counted.
But here’s something many crypto investors misunderstand.
A $10 TRILLION VALUATION DOES NOT MEAN $10 TRILLION HAS ENTERED THE MARKET.
Market capitalization is a valuation based on price and circulating supply.
It isn’t a bank account holding enough money for everyone to cash out.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
🔎 NOW IMAGINE SOMETHING ELSE.
All 10 million holders open their wallets.
They see $1 million displayed.
Everyone celebrates.
But suddenly, just 10% of holders decide to sell.
That’s:
1 MILLION PEOPLE
× 10,000 COINS
= 10 BILLION COINS OFFERED FOR SALE.
At $100 each, those sellers would be seeking:
$1 TRILLION IN BUYING DEMAND.
And that’s just 10% of the community.
Would there be enough buyers willing to purchase those coins at that price?
Would exchange order books support that volume?
Would the price remain at $100?
THOSE ARE THE QUESTIONS THAT MATTER.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
💡 HERE’S THE PART MOST PEOPLE DON’T UNDERSTAND.
It is mathematically possible for millions of people to hold assets valued at $1 million each.
But that doesn’t mean all of them can convert those assets into $1 million in cash simultaneously.
Their displayed wealth depends on the prevailing market price.
Their realizable wealth depends on the prices and quantities buyers are willing to pay when they sell.
And those are two very different things.
PAPER WEALTH IS NOT THE SAME AS CASH IN YOUR BANK ACCOUNT.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
🚨 NOW I HAVE A QUESTION FOR EVERY CRYPTO COMMUNITY.
If 10 million people each hold 10,000 coins…
And everyone believes their coins will eventually make them millionaires…
WHO WILL PROVIDE THE $10 TRILLION IN BUYING DEMAND IF EVERYONE WANTS TO CASH OUT?
Not everyone needs to sell simultaneously, and markets can attract new capital over time.
But no community can guarantee that every holder will exit at the same price.
This is why I believe investors should study liquidity, market depth, and genuine demand instead of relying only on future price predictions.
A COIN CAN MAKE MILLIONAIRES.
BUT A MILLION-DOLLAR WALLET BALANCE DOESN’T GUARANTEE A MILLION-DOLLAR CASHOUT.
And understanding that difference is one of the most important lessons in cryptocurrency investing.
NOW TELL ME SOMETHING.
Do you believe a single cryptocurrency could realistically make 10 million people millionaires?
YES OR NO? AND WHY?
I want to hear your mathematics.
— Max Stone
#MaxStone #CryptoResearch #CryptoMillionaires #Tokenomics #Bitcoin #CryptoMarkets #WallStreet #DigitalAssets #CEX #CryptoInvesting
Which project do you think is the most transparent project out of all these projects . Don’t be biased give your honest opinion. Also give reason why they are best .
Comment below . ⬇️
1. Grass Network
2. Sprout Network
3. MyTier
4. Unich Network
5. Sible Network
6. Interlink labs
7. Ari Wallet
8. Paralayx
10. Sirius Network
11. A Network
12. Mirex Network
13. Xenea Wallet
14. Grey Network
15. Sinbad
16. Cpen Network
17. Deltix Network
18. Omega Network
19. Ruby Network
20. Bee Network
21. Sidra Chain
22. Tickcoin
23. Goal Chain
24. Very chat
25. Gtech
🚨 INTERLINK LABS 🚨
HONG KONG ADDRESS
SAME ADDRESS WHERE @itl_fdn is registered .
The owner is Tony Trong and he is the agent .
@Crypto_A_A @chrisP_sible @web3scraphunt @kv_interlink
This is what you call wrong number
They just launched like two weeks ago
He is saying we will give 20% of the value of our contracts to our community .
Ask this Ai man @chrisP_sible
Who will sign a contract with u ?
What contract ? @SibleNetworkAI
Why will someone sign a contract ?
How will community knows that what contract you are signing ? @inter_link
You don’t have whitepaper @kv_interlink
You don’t know total supply 😂
No whitepaper
No supply
No owner
He is saying he will give 20% to community
Wake up guys
This is wrong number @chrisP_sible
@Crypto_A_A @web3scraphunt @kv_interlink @inter_link @CFTC
🚨 100 BILLION COINS. SCARCITY OR OVERSUPPLY?
Let’s examine established cryptocurrencies with their own blockchain ecosystems.
◆ XRP — 100 billion originally created.
◆ Cronos (CRO) — 100 billion maximum supply.
◆ Pi Network — 100 billion maximum supply.
◆ TRON — Originally 100 billion coins.
These projects have blockchain infrastructure, market access, and established ecosystems.
Yet a supply of 100 billion coins creates a serious challenge: scarcity.
When billions of coins are available, achieving a high price per coin requires enormous market demand and valuation. Utility alone does not guarantee that demand.
NOW LET’S DO SOME SIMPLE MATHEMATICS.
Imagine a cryptocurrency with 100 BILLION coins in total supply.
💰 At $1 per coin = $100 BILLION valuation.
💰 At $5 per coin = $500 BILLION valuation.
💰 At $10 per coin = $1 TRILLION valuation.
These figures represent fully diluted valuations. They would equal circulating market capitalization only if all 100 billion coins were circulating.
Now think about that.
Projects like XRP, Cronos, Pi Network, and TRON have already developed blockchain infrastructure, built ecosystems, and established market access.
Even with those achievements, enormous valuations are not automatic.
So why are some projects encouraging ordinary people to believe that a new coin with 100 billion supply can easily reach $1, $5, or even $10?
Where will the demand come from?
Where is the liquidity?
Where is the economic activity needed to support such valuations?
A $10 coin sounds exciting. A $1 TRILLION fully diluted valuation tells a very different story.
Promoting enormous price expectations without explaining these numbers creates unrealistic expectations among communities that may not understand market capitalization.
Now let’s talk about InterLink.
InterLink introduced $ITL through OTC trading, without an established CEX or DEX market.
Community-reported prices suggest $ITL has fallen from around $2 to below $1. But without transparent exchange trading and reliable market data, those prices cannot be independently established as a global market value.
And now attention is shifting toward $ITLG.
◆ 100 BILLION $ITLG total supply.
◆ No confirmed public exchange listing.
◆ A reported distribution option of 160 verified $ITLG for 1 $ITL.
◆ Further plans involving previously unverified $ITLG.
Remember, the 160:1 conversion concerns verified ITLG under a particular distribution option. It does not establish a market price for ITLG.
And if fewer than 5% of a claimed 10 million users have completed KYC, that would mean fewer than 500,000 verified participants.
The biggest concern is not simply 100 billion coins.
It is the combination of enormous potential supply, uncertain circulating supply, limited verified participation, and the absence of transparent price discovery.
If additional unverified balances become transferable, the market will need to understand how much supply could actually enter circulation.
You cannot manufacture scarcity through community size.
You cannot establish market value through Telegram quotations alone.
And you cannot ignore supply while predicting enormous prices.
Before discussing how high a coin can go, establish how many coins can actually enter the market.
#InterLink #ITLG #ITL #Crypto #Tokenomics #scam
@chrisP_sible @Crypto_A_A @web3scraphunt @reina_itl @Sadiqtech_
@kv_interlink
🚨 Interlink lab 🚨
THEY MADE A MISTAKE AGAIN
They posted the same guy video from @inter_link and @SibleNetworkAI account than deleted it .
Even one member posted it but deleted after that .
Pure scam 😂 😂
Look another proof
Some other people were posting this also
@Crypto_A_A @web3scraphunt @inter_link @kv_interlinkITL
Max Stone retweeted
GM
You won't be rich with interlink
You won't be rich with interlink
You won't be rich with interlink
You won't be rich with interlink
Remember this post and bookmark it @kv_interlink
Not everyone is going to pass KYC. I believe a lot of people will stay stuck for no reason, and I have a theory why.
Interlink has a 10B total supply. We know the calculation based on devided 160 ITLG from total supply 100B gives us 625M, but do you really believe the final circulating supply will be only that? I wouldn't be surprised if it ends up around 3-5B. Let's see.
Normal users spend years mining just to get a few ITLG, while ambassadors get over 1100 ITLG per post lol.
Then they tell you that 40k or 50k isn't enough. Bro, people spend years mining to reach 50k.
And somehow the same people promoting the project keep collecting rewards while normal users are struggling to get anything. What a business model.
Now people not some there is 70% are getting stuck with KYC too. Nice.
You won't get rich with Interlink.
You won't get rich with Interlink.
You won't get rich with Interlink.
Let's bookmark this and come back later. I really want to see how this story ends.
🚨 INTERLINK: A NEW ERA OR A NEW DISASTER? 🚨
I have some serious questions, and this time I don’t want motivational speeches. I WANT NUMBERS.
We were told $ITL was designed as a reserve asset for treasuries and institutional participation, while $ITLG had its own ecosystem utility.
Now look at what the community is facing.
🔴 100 BILLION TOTAL SUPPLY?
🔴 1.3 TRILLION $ITLG ALREADY DISTRIBUTED TO USERS?
🔴 160:1 CONVERSION FOR VERIFIED $ITLG?
🔴 ONLY 2% OF USERS KYC VERIFIED?
If these numbers are accurate, somebody needs to explain the economics.
WHAT EXACTLY IS THE VALUE OF 1.3 TRILLION UNVERIFIED $ITLG?
And here’s an even bigger question.
For months, people were encouraged to improve their HCS.
Ambassadors spent countless hours increasing their ACS.
Communities were told that activity, consistency, reputation, and contributions mattered.
SO WHAT HAPPENED TO ALL THOSE METRICS?
If HCS and ACS no longer meaningfully influence verification or allocation, why were millions of people encouraged to chase them?
And if only 2% have passed KYC, what does that mean for the remaining 98%?
Let’s talk about basic economics.
A coin with 100 billion supply needs a $100 billion market capitalization to reach just $1, assuming the entire supply is circulating.
WHERE IS THAT DEMAND COMING FROM?
Where are the treasury buyers?
Where is the liquidity?
Where is the actual economic utility?
And most importantly:
WHO BENEFITS FROM THIS NEW STRUCTURE?
Some people are celebrating every announcement without asking a single question.
I refuse to celebrate numbers I cannot understand.
LOYALTY DOES NOT MEAN BLINDNESS.
A COMMUNITY DESERVES TRANSPARENCY, NOT JUST HYPE.
I am not attacking anyone. I am questioning the economics.
Because the real question isn’t whether InterLink can launch a coin.
THE REAL QUESTION IS WHETHER THAT COIN CAN SUSTAIN VALUE.
And until these questions are answered, calling this a NEW ERA means absolutely nothing.
#InterLink #ITLG #ITL #Crypto #Tokenomics
@Crypto_A_A @web3scraphunt @kv_interlink @inter_link @miratang16
Independent opinion. Figures and proposed conversion terms require confirmation against current official documentation.
Last year in August he said $ITLG verification is about to start and it’s over a year now and still no verification of $ITLG
NOW NEW ERA COMING AGAIN 😂
The verification process for $ITLG is about to begin. Please ensure the following:
•Mine regularly to help secure the network.
•If you have referrals, encourage them to stay active by using your referral code.
•Do not use any third-party auto tools or automation software.
•Avoid buying or selling fake referrals.
•Stay compliant to minimize the risk of your tokens being burned.
•Join ambassador programs to accelerate your human verification process.
This process will be continuous, and InterLink Token will soon expand its ecosystem to enable stronger payment utilities, from dApps to online payment platforms.
Here @kv_interlink said poly market is joining @inter_link but never happened and now he saying new era 2026 of $itlg coming 😂
Always scam
Before @kv_interlink said the new era 2026 is coming and showed this USA office and after it was proved that their is no office in USA 😂
That was the new era 2026 story 😂
Now they coming with another new era again , Now let’s see what scam they come up with .
@chrisP_sible @Crypto_A_A @web3scraphunt
Max Stone retweeted
🚨 SIMPLE TRUTH ABOUT INTERLINK & FAKE "INVESTOR" CLAIMS @inter_link @kv_interlink
When a project lacks a live Layer-1 blockchain, they put famous company logos on their graphics to fool you.
Let's break down InterLink's fake "Google Investment" claim, their Visa contradiction, and why you should be careful.
InterLink claims they are "Led by investment from Google for Startups."
The Truth: Google is NOT a lead investor in InterLink. Google did NOT buy ITL orITLG tokens!
InterLink simply applied to the Google for Startups Cloud Program, an open promotional program where Google gives free server credits (up to $2,000–$200,000 in GCP hosting) to thousands of basic website developers.
Getting free hosting credits on Google Cloud is NOT equity investment or coin backing!
InterLink puts "Powered by Visa & Mastercard" logos on their graphics.
The Fact: Accepting credit/debit card payments on an e-commerce checkout page does NOT equal a corporate partnership with Visa.
Millions of online websites accept Visa card payments every day none of them are corporate partners with Visa.
InterLink introduced their ATV (Average Transaction Value) requirement, pushing users to generate card/QR transactions or buy card tiers to unlock earnings.
The Protocol Conflict: Visa rules strictly prohibit payment processors from requiring mandatory "activation requirements" or forced internal spending to unlock speculative digital points.
If Visa actually partnered with them, Visa compliance would shut down their merchant account immediately for this scheme!
InterLink claims they are "Recognized by NYSE (New York Stock Exchange)".
The Fact: Renting venue space near the NYSE or paying for promotional media interviews near their building does NOT mean NYSE endorsed or partnered with InterLink.
NYSE does not endorse tap to earn mobile apps!
They claim a "Top 51 global AI ranking on NIST".
The Fact: Submitting open-source facial code to a public government computer test (NIST FRTE) is an automated test submission.
NIST is a measurement lab they do NOT certify, back, or issue security stamps to crypto apps!
Why do they slap Google, Visa, NYSE, and NIST logos everywhere?
To make you trust them so you give them your facial biometrics scan and national ID card for "Proof of Personhood"! Giving your personal data to an app using fake partnership graphics is extremely dangerous.
Stop sending app users to argue in comment sections! Step forward and show:
Official proof from Google showing Google bought equity or tokens in InterLink.
An official press release from Visa's newsroom confirming a direct corporate contract.
A live, open-source Layer-1 Block Explorer showing native block production, RPC nodes, and validator nodes.
Stop defending project leaders who hide behind slapped on logos! If your team cannot show a live, open-source public block explorer, your $ITLG tokens are database numbers inside an app, not a real Layer-1 blockchain.
SUMMARY:
Google Cloud Credits ≠ Google Investment
Accepting Visa Payments ≠ Visa Partnership
Testing code on NIST benchmark ≠ NIST Certification
No Block Explorer = No Blockchain
Demand open-source proof over marketing graphics! Tell InterLink leaders to come and prove us wrong on-chain with evidence!
🟢 WhatsApp: whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb9…
✈️ Telegram: t.me/+-srunSrCfs0wNjRk
#CAAWatchdog #InterLink #ITLG #ITL #GoogleLie #ATV #FakePartnerships #Visa #NIST #NYSE #CryptoExposed #DYOR
They claiming they have 915000 users almost a million but only 50k downloaded the app 😂
😱🔵 @SibleNetworkAI Every day counts. Every minute counts. Every $SIBLE counts!
🚀 Over 915,000 users joined in just 62 days!
⛏️ Stay active with mining and AI acceleration.
🧠 Explore Sible Sentinel and complete daily missions.
🌍 Watch the ecosystem expand with new features and the upcoming Ambassador Program.
And with 20% of the value of signed contracts announced for ambassadors and the community, Sible is putting community participation in the spotlight.
The journey is moving fast. Stay active, stay informed, and grow with Sible! 💙
#SibleNetwork #SIBLE #Web3
