Pinned Tweet
A man is raped merely by being born; this is why there is no sense in celebrating male virginity. A foid, used to, be pampered and protected; her virginity was not only a sign of her own purity but that of the society that can foster and protect her.
It is much simpler. They want punitive judgement for crimes that disproportionately harm women (social/sex crimes), while they want rehabilitation and limited punishment for crimes that primarily harm men (violent crimes).
To make this clear, just look at a case on the border of both. Women would 100% be much harsher on a husband who committed moderate, physical domestic abuse compared to a criminal who mugged and maimed someone.
One of the most pathetic posts I’ve seen on this app. If the “friction” in one’s life comes from hosting people at one’s house or using an alarm clock instead of a phone, then they live such a pathetic and insignificant life that they would be much better off as a serf, which would give them much realer friction along with their work actually being part of a larger whole
“It’s about what’s best for the kid.”
One would think it’s best for the kid to stay in a two parent household.
Beyond there being no mainstream coverage of this at all through google news when you search for Elissicit "SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH!" Sloppins, I found it quite ironic that this is what is promoted by google for news instead.
ON UCHICAGO CAMPUS: U.S. Senator from Michigan Elissa Slotkin hopes planned political prosecutions of republican leaders will scare young conservatives from getting involved in politics.
@ElissaSlotkin
“Someone, not me of course, should kill the person I do not like”
even in their fantasies they are cucks
McHeartAttack retweeted
They didn’t. She was two years further along in her brain development, and she raped those intoxicated, sensitive young men. Even if we ignore the cougar hunting, we all know testosterone makes one hornier, so not only was she taking advantage of their youth and high hormone levels, they cannot be held accountable for their actions due to their hormonal state.
Aella cannot be a true effective altruist because she blocked me instead of agreeing to my breast milk and milking proposal, which would have netted me 10,000x more happiness than the discomfort she would endure, with an additional 0.01% chance of 10^1000 shrimp being born in the long run
“I am an Effective Altruist. The precautionary principle says we should act before catastrophe is certain. Given AI’s potentially irreversible downside, even a small existential risk demands restraint (Bostrom, 2014, Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies, pp. 115–119; Ord, 2020, The Precipice: Existential Risk and the Future of Humanity pp. 167–170)”
“I am not an Effective Altruist. The precautionary principle cuts both ways. On a value pluralist account expected-utility reasoning must consider the enormous benefits of AI too; we shouldn’t impose massive opportunity costs on the basis of highly uncertain risks (Miller, 2007, National Responsibility and Global Justice, pp. 27–30; MacIntyre, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, 2nd ed. pp. 216–225)”
“But moral uncertainty gives us reason to hedge when the stakes are existential. If we cannot confidently rule out catastrophe prudence demands slowing down (MacAskill, 2022, What We Owe the Future: A Million-Year View, pp. 95–105)”
“Sophist that you are, your view transforms prudence into paralysis: treating the mere possibility of catastrophe as sufficient reason to suppress potentially transformative benefits. A rational precautionary policy weighs probabilities and opportunity costs, it doesn’t fear the worst case scenario by default (Dennet, 2017, From Bacteria to Bach and Back, pp. 350-55). The United States will NEVER be an Effective Altruist country”
This effectively just gives the power to approve or halt AI to failed “philosophers” and applied ethicists (all at think tanks that have been funded by Dario and other EA types, I’m sure they won’t be biased!)
Truly some of the only people worse than tech bros and more likely to lead to an ideological AI that kills us all.
We Must Pace the Frontier: I’ve written a new essay on why the AI industry should slow down, with a three-part plan for doing so.
Anthropic is unilaterally committing to the first of these steps. We’ll provide third-party evaluators with permanent, employee-level access to our systems, so that they can verify adherence to our safety measures, report on incidents, and assess models’ alignment during training.
You can read the full post here: darioamodei.com/post/we-must…
and then 10% goes back to the King. Finally real politicking
.@POTUS announces the TRUMP DIVIDEND: If Republicans win both the House and the Senate, because of our tremendous economic success, I will issue a dividend to every adult citizen in the United States for $5,000
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The President of the United States has no constitutional or statutory authority to issue a dividend check on behalf of the US Government. Only the Congress can authorize and appropriate these funds.
constitutioncenter.org/the-constituti…
It should be Lake Superior, but only on the US side. It is lake inferior within the inferior country
“The healthcare industry is 79% women and is thriving!”
Yeah no wonder why everything is so expensive and none of it works
“Fascism is when you want a system similar to what noted liberal John Stuart Mill advocated. Please disregard the fact that no fascist state implemented this policy (they actually all supported universal suffrage and lowering the voting age).”
Why is Zohran considered a big success in NYC? Rents are way up. Real wages are down. Is it because he speaks to his electorate in a way they can understand, as you would to a group of 5 year olds?
