Julie

Asking questions is not the same thing as making accusations. Charlie Kirk was assassinated in front of thousands of people at a public event. An investigation of that magnitude should be capable of withstanding scrutiny—not just from law enforcement, prosecutors, or the media, but from the public. Some of the questions below may ultimately have completely ordinary explanations. Some may already have answers buried in reports, evidence logs, testimony, surveillance footage, or investigative records that have not been publicly released. But until those answers are documented, the questions remain. The purpose of this list is not to declare who was responsible or to manufacture a theory. It is to identify apparent gaps, unusual circumstances, evidentiary questions, and conflicting accounts that deserve clarification. Questions That Still Need Answered: 1. Why did Mickey McCoy walk away when is mentor and probably his best friend was dying? 2. Why was Charlie's necklace not put into evidence as part of the crime scene? 3. Why was Charlie's phone not placed in evidence? 4. Why was the SUV that drove him to the hospital not put into evidence, cleaned and sold within days of the assassination? 5. Why was the crime scene excavated and paved over within 72 hours? 6. Why did Farnsworth run to record himself as Charlie was fighting for this life? Claiming he was dead before anyone knew his actual status? 7. Why was George Zinn not interviewed by anyone after his claim that he was to be paid for causing a diversion at the event? 8. Why was Zachariah Qureshi released so quickly and no one has interviewed him? 9. Why did Mikey McCoy look to Dan Flood, take a candid picture of Charlie and then look to Dan Flood, whom followed with a hand signal right before the bang? 10. Why has TPUSA and all reps lie immediately after his death discouraging anyone from researching into it? 11. Why is there so much propaganda surrounding this investigation? Attacks on podcasters... 12. Why were Charlie's clothing not collected at the hospital for evidence? 13. Were all individuals with access to restricted, backstage, security, rooftop, or event-preparation areas identified and interviewed? 14. Which TPUSA member spoke with Tyler Robinson? 15. Where is the Metadata for Tyler's discord messages? 16. If Lance didnt burn the noteN which he stated he didnt under oath. Who burned it? 17. Why was foreign involvement investigation stopped exactly? None of these questions, individually or collectively, proves a conspiracy. They also should not be treated as proof that the government's case is false. They are questions. And there is an important difference between evidence that contradicts an official conclusion and information that simply has not yet been publicly explained. The appropriate response to an unanswered question isn't to invent the answer—but it also isn't to ridicule the person asking it. Document the evidence. Release what can legally be released. Establish the timelines. Identify the witnesses. Explain the forensic findings. Account for the physical evidence. Show the chain of custody. And allow the facts to lead wherever they lead. If the evidence ultimately supports the prosecution's account, rigorous examination should strengthen that conclusion—not threaten it. Charlie Kirk's assassination deserves more than speculation from either side. It deserves a complete evidentiary record, careful scrutiny, and answers that can survive examination. Until then, the responsible position isn't to claim we know what happened beyond what the evidence establishes. It's to keep asking the questions the evidence has not yet answered. @baroncoleman @RealCandaceO @ProjectConstitu @realstewpeters @SwordTruth @IanCarrollShow @iamcoachcolin