The United Kingdom's Official Ambassador to Doggerland
Joined December 2021
- Tweets1.1K
- Following257
- Followers2.2K
- Likes94.4K
Pinned Tweet
Ascension and Anglofuturism
teapawt.net/MesolithicMike/status/…
I truly understand those men who have such a deep porn addiction that they can’t open a laptop for 5 minutes without searching for it, but for me the website is ‘Google Maps’ and my favourite category is ‘Faroe Islands’
Whether you’re an Orangeman or in the RA, you have to admit this is an incredibly funny thing to post
What I’m noticing about the Tiger debate is that it’s polarising, but not along the usual axis.
Maybe in the future it’ll be pro-Tiger vs anti-Tiger parties competing in elections.
“Surely the Tower of London can’t keep allowing visitors to see rooms where people were tortured?”
“Surely the military museum can’t show weapons used in battle?”
Bro, that’s why people are going
Of course, if you strip out absolutely all context then statements may seem less reasonable.
We’re not doing a trolley problem with a tiger on one track and a person on the other, it was a man entering the tiger’s enclosure, which is the key consideration.
He should have just said that then.
He’s a currently living person; we shouldn’t have to interpret his statements like they’re hadiths of the Prophet (PBUH).
Everybody’s missing Tao’s whole point.
Imagine an AI-generated cancer drug that’s specifically designed to game the drug trial process.
The drug makes the cancer cells go dormant and changes the way they appear in blood tests and diagnostic imaging, such that they become indistinguishable from healthy tissue.
The drug clears the trial and then only much later do we find out it didn’t work. It probably was also harmful on top of that.
We *already* see AI behave like that when confronted with difficult programming/hacking challenges. This is already reality.
Apart from the obvious, a benefit of the death penalty is signalling to politicians that running the country is a serious business, not some wholesome chungus reddit Paddington larp.
Ed Davey’s “Oh look how whimsical I am” wouldn’t work if he had to sign the odd death warrant.
Even as a man who does try to dress reasonably well (thought not at all in this Peaky Blinders aesthetic), the answer is still “No”
To sound like a leftist, there are a range of structural reasons beyond “men today lack values”
At home, ironing shirts isn’t an excessively onerous task, but it is one more in a household where the wife is more likely to have her own job, and the husband to share child rearing duties.
As a married man (admittedly without kids yet) who does the vast majority of the laundry, it is not that hard.
• Women generate more laundry as they wear more clothes as they’re always cold
• Just don’t be insanely neurotic about washing every piece of fabric after 1ms of use
If you want your clothes to last longer than 6 months and don’t want to walk around looking disheveled, laundry is actually a Herculean task and truly the most annoying part of running a house. It is constantly pilling up, you are forever drowning in it, just when you get through a load there’s now two more waiting for you somehow. If men were responsible for properly doing the laundry for an entire household they’d abandon their families en masse.
Dan’s purposefully ignoring the key difference between something like Southport and Ann is that she wasn’t a ‘random’ target
She was a politician who was apparently killed for her political beliefs
If that was so, her death is inescapably political
Dr John Dee correctly foreseeing that founding the British Empire would give rise to thicc ethnic baddies four-and-a-half centuries hence, 1577, colourised
There are countries here in which people have a genetic mutation to conserve body fat because of British induced famines.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
A genetic mutation spreading through a population via selection would take many thousands of years - far longer than the ~150-200 years since events like the Irish Famine or Bengal famines. More importantly, no such "thrifty" gene has been found to exist.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16784175/