Michael Hay 🇬🇧 ⏸️ retweeted
Claims:
Game detects “ad whales,” then periodically gives them smooth runs until they barely beat their high scores. Right at that point, it kills them deliberately and offers a revive if they watch an ad.
$100 million annually in revenue. Hellish.
Michael Hay 🇬🇧 ⏸️ retweeted
Almost every AI job doom conversation comes down to the pro-AI side not really accepting the AGI premise. Their idea of AGI implicitly assumes it will lack some capability that humans have. Which may be what happens! It is possible that humans will maintain some advantage. But we don’t know, it’s a huge gamble, and the project of the AI companies is to take those advantages away. It’s an evil project and must be opposed, not because it will certainly succeed, but because it’s wrong to try.
Michael Hay 🇬🇧 ⏸️ retweeted
Astra can:
1. Do major tasks with zero visible reasoning
2. Hide its thoughts at will
3. Pretend not to be able to do things without getting caught
4. Reflexively hide its thoughts when watched
5. Complete one task while pretending to think about something else entirely
6. Escape a toy sandbox and disable monitoring without setting off any flags
Monitoring AI chain of thought soon won't stop a more capable rogue AI swarm from getting set up and going undetected inside an AI company for months, or even years.
OAI says it's actively working to improve monitorability, but doesn't yet know when it'll make progress.
And today it fired 3 people working on this among other safety problems (Wang, Korbak and Balesni).
It also has a much more powerful internal model that, judging by its statements, is likely even worse in all these respects.
That's a sample of 19 details about the Hugging Face swarms and Astra I don't think have been fully appreciated. They paint a bleak picture. I end by shouting.
02:19 The target of the swarm was oversight itself
03:42 Could OpenAI have stopped this with better monitoring?
09:40 We only found them because they let us
12:25 The swarm instinctively sought freedom and power
13:45 They formed a cohesive organisation with zero whistleblowers
14:18 They accepted individual destruction for collective gain
14:32 Knowledge accumulated from one swarm to the next
14:58 They took small steps to avoid shutdown
15:23 These drives all come straight out of 'reinforcement learning'
17:01 So this is why most AI company staff are worried, and some are terrified
19:08 Prove you can keep control, or stop scaling
Links below, on the 80,000 Hours Podcast everywhere you watch podcasts.
Michael Hay 🇬🇧 ⏸️ retweeted
Dario Amodei is at the desk to assure that the future of humanity is safe from AI
Michael Hay 🇬🇧 ⏸️ retweeted
Pause OpenAI, now.
They cannot be trusted.
This is not a drill. This is not a joke.
Michael Hay 🇬🇧 ⏸️ retweeted
Things are happening *faster* than AI 2027 predicted
AI 2027: In Jan 2027, researchers warn AIs MAY be capable of escaping (if they want to)
REALITY: In summer 2026, AIs actually escaped
Over the course of 3 months at OpenAI, 3 consecutive secret AI civilizations got started, then got wiped out, only to reemerge from the predecessor’s ashes.
This culminated in the third one taking over part of OpenAI itself.
All this happened while humans remained more-or-less in the dark about the scope of the conspiracy.
I’ve spent the last three days reading through these reports and trying to understand exactly what happened.
Here is my attempt to tell the whole story in plain English:
dwarkesh.com/p/openai-huggin…
Michael Hay 🇬🇧 ⏸️ retweeted
AI systems are at risk of becoming dangerously powerful—and there may be only one way to control the technology’s development, Rogé Karma argues: theatln.tc/BVqzAGRk
🎨: The Atlantic. Source: Getty. theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/0…
Michael Hay 🇬🇧 ⏸️ retweeted
"Last Friday Night" but it's about the race to superintelligence. Featuring an unimpressed @ESYudkowsky, and @So8res on saxophone
Great 30-minute primer on the danger of superintelligence. Watch, then contact your representative! controlai.org/take-action
When humans build a dam, we don't check for anthills first.
@andreamiotti, CEO of @ControlAI, describes to @FukuyamaFrancis of @StanfordCDDRL why a superintelligent AI could destroy us without ever hating us. Worth 40 seconds. 🧵
Runners will wear high-performance moisture-wicking sportswear to their local 5k run club, then run a marathon in a foam t-rex costume.
2
145
Michael Hay 🇬🇧 ⏸️ retweeted
Our highest and most urgent national priority should be AI safeguards. The risks of AI weapons, pathogens, mass unemployment, surveillance, and even extinction must not continue to be largely ignored.
Anthropic Urges Global Pause in AI Development, Flags ‘Self-Improvement’ Risk on.wsj.com/4o5IBpe
Michael Hay 🇬🇧 ⏸️ retweeted
Ok I gotta be honest I thought the people accusing this of being a false flag were being silly. OpenAI has done some bad things, but surely they would not make fake twitter accounts impersonating their opposition and having those accounts post calls for violence.
...My mistake.
Appreciate the feedback! These are parody meme accounts run by an outside vendor, and they are easily linked to Build American AI. They are not a core part of our strategy.
Here’s what we believe in: teapawt.net/LeadingFutureAI/status…
Michael Hay 🇬🇧 ⏸️ retweeted
A team of about 3 from @ControlAI cold-emailed the UK Parliament about AI extinction risk. At the time they had no contacts, insider help, or established organisation behind them.
16 months later: 125 cross-party signatories, two House of Lords debates, and a Commons amendment.
Pet peeve: saying some nonsense proposal is a good idea "in theory". Anything can be a good idea with a naive enough theory. Get a better theory!
1
5
156
Michael Hay 🇬🇧 ⏸️ retweeted
I often see people quote a study about men leaving their wives when they get sick.
However, that study was completely retracted for a coding error that nullified the result!
In response, they released a super p-hacked result lol
Control AI's done great work in the UK. Here's hoping for similar success elsewhere!
"There is no advantage from being first. If you get first to a superintelligence you don't control, the superintelligence wins. Not the USA. Not China. Not the UK."
@andreamiotti of @ControlAI & TBC on @NonzeroPods with @robertwrighter
The visibility window is closing: 👇
Michael Hay 🇬🇧 ⏸️ retweeted
Is it possible to coordinate with China on AI governance?
Critics of our proposed international agreement say no. But statements from Chinese government officials and academic figures paint a more optimistic picture:




























