Exactly, however you also have to recognise that the circumstances in ones displacement does not fix itself overnight. I do not blame the African diaspora in Britain not repatriating themselves, because quite frankly Africa is in an absolute mess due to the chains of neo-colonialism and deliberate instability backed by Zionist and other Western powers to maintain influence and control over the people and resources. The 'independence' that these African countries have been bestowed from the courtesy of European imperialists came with conditions, and therefore deception. The self-determination of these nations will come at our economic expense, The West does not want to admit the fact that the potential for prosperous industrialisation within the African continent is inevitable with true independence, take Addis Ababa and Kigali as a case study; both cities are modernising quickly even whilst still under the guise of foreign organisations. Look what happened to Gaddafi, Nkrumah, Sankara, all leaders that advocated for a pan-Africanist project and were vanquished by 'you know who'. I love remigration now! as much as the next man, but disregarding the fact that you can actually collaborate pragmatically with influencers such as Akon is a missed opportunity that is shrinking by the day. The first step is promoting a pan-Africanist sentiment here in the UK for the African diaspora by encouraging them to be patriotic for their homelands rather than Britain. This is the best technique for them to surrender and yield the 'British' label they are compelled to give themselves without being malicious and ignorant about their concerns.

Interesting discussion, at PSV this is our take: On one hand, you have Tel Aviv: proudly waved as the "gay capital of the Middle East," a beacon of secular liberalism. On the other, you have the bombs over Gaza: the brutal, military enforcement of a political project. The Western left cries itself to sleep over the latter, while its entire worldview depends on the existence of the former. They don't realise they are customers of the very thing they claim to protest. Here’s the hard truth they can't handle: Their "progressive" bubble, their gender ideology, their radical individualism, their entire break from tradition and God, is protected and enforced by the Zionist project. Think about it. The Middle East is home to deep, traditional, religious civilizations that fundamentally reject the secular liberal worldview. Who contains these forces? Who actively works to dismantle and suppress them? The answer is the Israeli state. It acts as the West's permanent, forward-operating attack dog. It does the "dirty work" of holding back the tide of traditionalism that would otherwise challenge the globalist agenda. Meanwhile, back in London and New York, the left enjoys the spoils of this war they never have to fight. They get to parade in the streets, championing a godless, borderless, consumerist society, a society that could not exist if the traditional forces contained in the Middle East were ever allowed to flourish unchecked. They are the ultimate hypocrites. They want the product but can't stand to look at the factory. They want to eat the chicken nugget but cry about the slaughterhouse. Their moral outrage is a luxury item, paid for by the very violence they denounce. So the next time you see a "progressive" activist screaming about Gaza, understand this: They aren't just misguided. They are utterly deluded. If they truly understood the mechanics of their own ideology, they wouldn't be protesting Netanyahu. They'd be kissing his feet. He is the guarantor of their comfort. The wall that keeps their fantasy world safe. We are the only ones who see this entire corrupt system. We reject both the globalist master and his Zionist attack dog. This isn't about left vs. right. It's about the sovereign, traditional nation vs. a rootless, godless global empire.

100% But we need to be more ambitious in our understanding of ‘taking it back’. The true story of the theft and infiltration of England is so much deeper than those migrants on boats. I would argue it started in 1948 with the inception of the Israeli state. Ever since then we’ve led a foreign policy of obedience and servitude to that hostile state, at the expense of our own interests and sovereignty. British parliament belongs to the British. British foreign policy should be decided in Britain by the British. What’s in Britain’s best interest should be decided by the British. Who the British consider allies, should be decided by the British and should be decided pragmatically based only on Britains best interest. None of this should be controversial to say.