Veteran MI analyst, Forensic Investigator, Problem Management. An amateur trains until they get it right, a professional trains until they can't get it wrong.
Texas, USA
Joined February 2013
- Tweets51.5K
- Following5K
- Followers2.9K
- Likes122K
![Matrix Paradigm of Societal Siloes [Part 1 Overview]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HMJOqLhWUAABlyB.jpg)
ShanghaiMoon retweeted
No, actually, it isn’t
If you go to bed on election night and don't know who won a midterm congressional race, that's normal. And if you wake up the next morning and find that a candidate who was behind hours earlier has since pulled ahead, that's normal, too. (via @PolitiFact) to.pbs.org/4zqnWBa
ShanghaiMoon retweeted
Brussels is losing its grip… and the European Union experiment is beginning to fracture under the weight of its own contradictions...
France erupts, Germany follows, and across Europe the pressure continues building as citizens confront the consequences of mass migration, declining affordability, deteriorating public services, and governments increasingly disconnected from the people they represent...
Germany, France, Poland, and Austria have reinstated internal border controls… a remarkable reversal for a European system built around eliminating those very boundaries...
Look at the pattern… Brussels continues pushing centralized governance while sovereign nations increasingly assert the authority necessary to protect their own populations...
The deeper the domestic pressures become, the harder it is to maintain a structure where political authority is distributed upward while consequences remain with the people...
This is how complex systems begin losing coherence... the institutions continue operating, the bureaucracy continues issuing directives, yet the underlying relationships holding everything together become increasingly strained...
The streets reveal the pressure... the borders reveal the response... and the growing sovereignty movements reveal the direction of the political struggle...
The European Union's centralized control model is confronting the very force it was designed to contain… national sovereignty...
Once nations begin reclaiming authority over their own destiny, the balance of power across the entire European structure begins to shift...
ShanghaiMoon retweeted
The Authoritarian Litmus Test question apllies to all proposed solutions, regardless of which side of the aisle it comes from.
Same goes for the Cult of Personality Litmus Test, regardless of the influencer.
The Authoritarian Litmus Test question apllies to all proposed solutions, regardless of which side of the aisle it comes from.
Same goes for the Cult of Personality Litmus Test, regardless of the influencer.
ShanghaiMoon retweeted
We have all seen controlled opposition and infiltrators, but we have also seen verified sources in dispute recenly, and that latter has led me to a similar conclusion. Or at least entertaining the possibility. The dustup between @idontexistTore and @DataRepublican is a perfect example. Neither have gone the route of Tucker or MJT. I know that Tore is the original source, because I saw her work in real time, years before Jennica's bombshell 'discovery'. Jennica has huge credibility on X, and current admin support, whereas Tore appears sometimes to be off the reservation, pushing the envelope to teach her audience how to question. Jennica's failure to credit Tore for Tore's work has been my only objection to Jennica's handling of this (you can tell me all day that Tore falsely accuses people of stealing her work and it doesn't change what I saw. Just like the during the Covid lockdowns and I was told that my local hospitals were "overwhelmed" yet with my own eyes I experienced the truth that revealed the lie and the lack of any patients or ER waiting times).
DR has now admitted she was 'given' the data, and it would appear it was handed off by someone in DOJ or Congress to Jennica from the info Tore provided years ago (which I also saw produced years ago, from infiltrated leftist organizations and all)...
There are some valid questions on this disclosure breaking the Chain of Custody on this data and there appears to be some curation, and misleading edits, of the original data, yet I would not presume to say what the intent is at this juncture.
ShanghaiMoon retweeted
Excellent post, breaking the duality illusion and showing a far more accurate picture of the geopolitical landscape.
In my opinion there are three main political ideologies vying for primacy in DC. 1) The elites: these are moderate Democrats and Bush Republicans. They are still locked into the last economic and security epoch. Globalization, which advantaged China, and the “Rules-based Order,” which also advantaged China. 2) The Progressives: they inherited Global Communism from the Soviet Union dressed up in the particular implementation created by the Chinese Communists. They want one-party rule and the nanny state. 3) The America Firsters: They are more worker-oriented and fiercely nationalistic. They want to preserve the Constitutional Republic in a world that is vastly different from when that document was created. They want reindustrialization and international relationships that are based on national interests.
They are all vying for power while outside foreign influences muddy the domestic political waters seeking to prevent the US from becoming a threat. That main threat being a Constitutional Republic that values the free and independent citizen.
Excellent post, breaking the duality illusion and showing a far more accurate picture of the geopolitical landscape.
In my opinion there are three main political ideologies vying for primacy in DC. 1) The elites: these are moderate Democrats and Bush Republicans. They are still locked into the last economic and security epoch. Globalization, which advantaged China, and the “Rules-based Order,” which also advantaged China. 2) The Progressives: they inherited Global Communism from the Soviet Union dressed up in the particular implementation created by the Chinese Communists. They want one-party rule and the nanny state. 3) The America Firsters: They are more worker-oriented and fiercely nationalistic. They want to preserve the Constitutional Republic in a world that is vastly different from when that document was created. They want reindustrialization and international relationships that are based on national interests.
They are all vying for power while outside foreign influences muddy the domestic political waters seeking to prevent the US from becoming a threat. That main threat being a Constitutional Republic that values the free and independent citizen.
ShanghaiMoon retweeted
In my opinion there are three main political ideologies vying for primacy in DC. 1) The elites: these are moderate Democrats and Bush Republicans. They are still locked into the last economic and security epoch. Globalization, which advantaged China, and the “Rules-based Order,” which also advantaged China. 2) The Progressives: they inherited Global Communism from the Soviet Union dressed up in the particular implementation created by the Chinese Communists. They want one-party rule and the nanny state. 3) The America Firsters: They are more worker-oriented and fiercely nationalistic. They want to preserve the Constitutional Republic in a world that is vastly different from when that document was created. They want reindustrialization and international relationships that are based on national interests.
They are all vying for power while outside foreign influences muddy the domestic political waters seeking to prevent the US from becoming a threat. That main threat being a Constitutional Republic that values the free and independent citizen.
ShanghaiMoon retweeted
The Arctic, NATO expansion and the war in Ukraine are framed here as pieces of a larger geopolitical contest. Geography matters—but so does separating claims from evidence. #Geopolitics #Arctic
ShanghaiMoon retweeted
(The post is a publicly-available inquiry to @jordangreennc of “RawStory dot com” in response to an opinion piece recently published by Mr. Green on such platform.)
Hello Mr. Green:
My name is Tom Anderson, and I am better known under my pseudonym “Cynical Publius” on X.
I am writing with regards to the recent story published on “RawStory” under your byline, entitled “'Specter of menace': Pentagon-tied influencers vent of 'civil war' threat after midterms.”
More specifically, I am working on an investigative article regarding the penchant of so-called “journalists” such as you to mislead their readers, and given the monstrous inaccuracies and omissions in your recent article, your tale is something of significant interest to my readers.
With the above in mind, I have several questions I am hoping you will see fit to answer at your earliest opportunity:
1. In your recent RawStory article, you identified the fact that Ms. Jennica Pounds (“Data Republican” on X) has revealed a wide-ranging number of videos and audio tapes of former USAID and U.S. military employees plotting the creation of a “crisis of legitimacy” regarding President Trump and the upcoming midterm election. I myself published a widely-read article on X explaining how the tactics discussed on these tapes conform to the practices of “Color Revolutions” created by the U.S, government in Ukraine, Serbia, Georgia and other nations in the former Soviet bloc and former Yugoslavia. Your “article” criticized the motivations of me, Ms. Pounds and others in exposing such plot, while never once addressing the substance of such plot as revealed in the “Democracy Files” (as defined by Ms. Pounds) and my recent article entitled "The Color Revolution in Our Midst." Do you consider it an ethical journalistic practice to wholly ignore the findings of whistleblowers while engaging in character assassination of such whistleblowers?
2. In your X post announcing your RawStory “article,” you described me and others reporting on the Color Revolution plot as being members of a “Pentagon troll farm.” Given that it is a well-established fact of public record that neither me nor any of the other people you identified in your article publicly write or have ever publicly written at the behest or payment of the Pentagon, do you consider such libelous accusations to be an acceptable journalistic practice?
3. How did you obtain my personal phone number and the personal phone numbers/emails of the other persons referenced in your “article”? Did you illegally obtain such information in violation of the Privacy Act of 1974, and/or did you obtain such information from other “journalists,” such as Dan Lamothe of the Washington Post, who may have initially obtained such information illegally in violation of said Privacy Act?
4. In your “article,” you relied on a source from the Southern Poverty Law Center (“SPLC”) to attempt to discredit me and the other subjects of your article. As you solicited the SPLC’s opinion, did you first consider that the SPLC is currently the subject of a Department of Justice investigation regarding the SPLC’s alleged wire fraud and conspiracy to commit money laundering? Did you consider the fact that the SPLC has allegedly funded the Ku Klux Klan as part of a fund-raising effort? Did these facts give you any pause whatsoever before you solicited or published the SPLC’s opinion?
5. The Color Revolutionaries documented in the Democracy Files speak openly and often of coordinating with Democrat governors to overthrow the Constitutionally-elected President of the United State of America. Did the seditionist nature of this on-the-record plot cause you any concern of any kind?
6. Have either you or RawStory received any cash or other consideration, directly or indirectly, from any of the NGOs or persons identified in the Democracy Files?
7. Have you been in direct contact with any of the persons or NGOs identified in the Democracy Files?
Thank you in advance for your answers to these questions. My readers have significant concerns as to the integrity of “journalists” like you who practice under the protective umbrella of the Democrat/Media Complex while spreading falsehoods, half-truths and virulently false innuendo. You answers will hopefully shed light on this important issue.
Please respond to these questions no later than 10 a.m. Eastern, November 1, 2026.
Best regards,
Tom Anderson
ShanghaiMoon retweeted
🚨 JUST NOW: President Trump goes SCORCHED EARTH on Barack Hussein Obama with a brutal "Life Before Obama" post
- There was no ISIS
- There was no Black Lives Matter
- There was no ANTIFA
- There was no War On Police
- There was no law legalizing propaganda on American citizens
- There was no Russia Hoax
- There was no expensive Obamacare
- There was no TDS
Every single one of these exploded on Hussein's watch or came straight out of his administration, and TRUMP is cleaning up the mess
The Russia Hoax alone tried to take down a sitting president. Obama hasn't answered for it, despite it being a LITERAL ATTEMPTED COUP
Now they are trotting out Hussein for the midterms because they're desperate 🤡
Hussein's legacy is tarnished.
🤖 Made with AI
ShanghaiMoon retweeted
55 years ago, Rhodesia was a crown jewel of civilization in Africa.
Today, it is squalid and destitute, "liberated" by violent Marxists.
Everywhere, Marxists have chosen squalor, calling it freedom.
That is what Democrats want to do to America.
ShanghaiMoon retweeted
TRUMP ISSUES RESPONSE
The linked post is critical of @realDonaldTrump for not once issuing any form of reply relative to the numerous COVID fraud reports submitted over several years.
Most recently, I made another filing through Trump's online fraud portal & I received a response.
I'm not sure which deserves more criticism:
-Not issuing any response
-Issuing the type of response I got - an Autopen signed form letter sent by email listing the Administration's criminal justice accomplishments that was entirely devoid of the broader matter or any of the specifics in the filing.
It's clear that the online COVID fraud filing got siloed into the "justice form letter" stack.
The worst sort of people faked a "pandemic" in order to steal an "election" & the targeted subject now in a position of Constitutional authority to remedy all of that refuses to do so.
Why?
Here's an open letter to @realDonaldTrump from 09 Nov 24 calling for action on the RICO crimes of COVID-19. It's far from the first. I've been filing reports & federal lawsuits since early 2021.
The President is heavily pursuing fraud in calling for Americans to report incidents of it to his administration & to him personally. He's even rolled out an incentive program for reliable reporting.
Simple question:
I've been writing the President for YEARS reporting the RICO crimes & fraud of COVID-19 & I've used every interface you can imagine - countless contacts including back-channeling communications to his Deputy White House counsel.
WHY HAVE I NEVER HEARD BACK FROM ANYONE?
NOT
A
SINGLE
TIME
Where are @realDonaldTrump @TheJusticeDept @FBI @FBIDirectorKash @SecWar ?
You asked to receive reports of fraud.
I've been reporting the grandest RICO construct outside of "climate change" in real time since early 2021.
And you don't even bother to acknowledge the reporting.
Please explain yourselves.
Aldous Huxley's "Brave New World"
"He realized that a proud, armed citizenry would always fight back against an obvious military dictator. Therefore, future tyrants would abandon whips and chains in favor of welfare, cradle-to-grave safety, and endless administrative rules. They would conquer free citizens by offering to manage their lives in the name of compassion."
ShanghaiMoon retweeted
Anyone who questioned dumping fluoride in the water was called a crank.
When Grand Rapids started it in 1945, the CDC later ranked the program among the century’s top public health wins.
Then the 1964 film Dr. Strangelove put Sterling Hayden’s General Jack D. Ripper on screen ranting that fluoridation was a communist plot against “our precious bodily fluids,” and that became the permanent punchline used to mock every skeptic for decades after.
Utah and Florida banned it in 2025 after the National Toxicology Program said higher exposure links to lower kids’ IQ and a federal judge called the US level an unreasonable risk.
But then the appeals court tossed the order in May 2026 without ever settling whether the dose they still push actually harms developing brains.
ShanghaiMoon retweeted
In 1835, a Young French Aristocrat Predicted the Exact Bureaucratic Trap Threatening the West Today
Before the philosopher Alexis de Tocqueville ever set foot in America, radical tyranny had already scarred his family. During the French Revolution’s Reign of Terror, left-wing Jacobin zealots guillotined his great-grandfather and threw his newlywed parents into a Paris dungeon. Waiting daily for the executioner's blade, his father’s hair turned snow-white at the age of twenty-one. Only the sudden fall of Robespierre spared his parents' lives by a matter of hours, allowing Alexis to be born a decade later.
Raised in the shadow of state terror, Tocqueville became obsessed with a single question: why did the French pursuit of utopian equality end in a bloodbath, while the American Revolution produced the freest, most prosperous republic on earth? In 1831, at just twenty-five years old, he convinced the French government to send him to the United States under the mundane bureaucratic cover of inspecting American prisons. Once he arrived, he spent nine months traveling seven thousand miles by stagecoach, steamboat, and horseback to study the soul of the American citizen.
His observations became Democracy in America, one of the most brilliant political analyses ever written. Tocqueville realized that American greatness rested on three pillars: fierce individual self-reliance, decentralized local communities, and a strong foundation of religious morality. Whenever Americans saw a problem, they formed a local group and fixed it themselves rather than begging a distant politician for help.
Yet as he studied the young republic, Tocqueville foresaw a chilling vulnerability. He realized that a proud, armed citizenry would always fight back against an obvious military dictator. Therefore, future tyrants would abandon whips and chains in favor of welfare, cradle-to-grave safety, and endless administrative rules. They would conquer free citizens by offering to manage their lives in the name of compassion.
Describing this future nanny state in 1840, Tocqueville wrote a passage that reads like a headline from today:
"Above this race of men stands an immense and tutelary power, which takes upon itself alone to secure their gratifications and to watch over their fate... It seeks to keep them in perpetual childhood. It covers the surface of society with a network of small complicated rules, minute and uniform, through which the most original minds and the most energetic characters cannot penetrate, to rise above the crowd... till each nation is reduced to nothing better than a flock of timid and industrious animals, of which the government is the shepherd."
Tocqueville called this system "soft despotism." Nearly two centuries ago, he understood that when citizens trade personal responsibility for government security, the state gladly reduces them to dependent children. Every bloated regulatory agency, speech code, and entitlement program today operates on the exact blueprint he exposed. Liberty rarely perishes overnight in a violent coup; it erodes quietly when a free people allow bureaucrats to become their shepherds.
ShanghaiMoon retweeted
Seven Cents a Pound
These stories are amazing.
open.substack.com/pub/eko/p/…
the only reason any SR-71 engine data still exists is because somebody missed a box under their desk.
back in 1970, a pentagon telegram ordered all the tools that built the Blackbird (40,000+) to be destroyed. Cut up and sold for scrap at seven cents a pound.
Ben Rich helped build that plane. He called it dumb.
When the Air Force retired the engines, everything engine makers left behind fit in 2-3 small boxes. Those only made it because somebody missed them when the destroy order came down.
This year the administration pulled out its last Blackbird, #844, off its stand in the desert and rolled it into a hangar. Turns out a retired Blackbird crew chief in his late 70s got a call to help put one back in the air.
ShanghaiMoon retweeted
So many Doomers, Black-Pillers cry when their "magical thinking" fails. there is no 'magic bullet', nor 'magic wand' to wave, to change things.
I recommend reading up on the Flywheel Effect and how you actually enact organizational change.
