Boudry: 'Bovendien heeft Israël zich ... vrijwillig en eenzijdig uit Gaza teruggetrokken. ... Het exacte tegendeel dus van "landroof".'
De Westbank telt blijkbaar niet meer mee.
Schaamteloze propagandist. Intellectuele 🤡.
Dit krijg je dus als je nooit meer tegenstemmen toelaat in de echokamer van media en academia over Israël: een aaneenschakeling van leugens en geschiedvervalsing, opgetekend door @DriesLesage. Met als toppunt:
"De Israëlische annexatie en kolonisatie sinds 1967 zijn even misdadig als de Russische bezetting in Oekraïne."
Oekraïne is al decennialang een soevereine, internationaal erkende staat, bovendien beschermd door het Boedapestmemorandum. Een Palestijnse staat bestaat echter niet en heeft nooit bestaan, omdat Palestijnse leiders elk voorstel tot de oprichting ervan hebben afgewezen: van de Peelcommissie in 1937 en het VN-partitieplan in 1947 tot de vredesvoorstellen van 2000 en 2008.
Het doel van de Arabische landen was altijd de vernietiging van de ene Joodse staat in het Midden-Oosten, niet de oprichting van een onafhankelijke Palestijnse staat. Toen Egypte en Jordanië na hun vernietigingsoorlog tegen Israël respectievelijk de betwiste gebieden in de regio (Gaza, Oost-Jeruzalem en de West Bank) bezetten, kraaide daar geen haan naar. Want dat was bezetting door andere Arabieren, niet door de verfoeide Joden.
Bovendien heeft Israël zich in 2005 vrijwillig en eenzijdig uit Gaza teruggetrokken en de Palestijnen de kans gegeven er zelf iets van te maken. Ze hebben zelfs hun eigen Israëlische burgers hardhandig verwijderd. Het exacte tegendeel dus van "landroof".
Het resultaat? Twintig jaar terreurbewind door Hamas, miljarden geïnvesteerd in de uitbouw van een militair tunnelnetwerk met menselijke schilden, en de voorbereiding van de slachtpartij van 7 oktober.
Is het een wonder dat de Israëli's niet langer een Palestijnse staat willen? Het zou gewoon suïcidaal zijn. De Palestijnen hebben zelf hun kansen op een staat verkwanseld, door hun starre eliminationisme en hun onophoudelijke terreur.
Het is werkelijk ongelofelijk dat deze man hoogleraar internationale politiek is. Maar hij is helaas niet de enige: hele universiteiten worden nu bevolkt door zulke types.
standaard.be/opinies/de-para…
ThAt'S FiNe BeCaUsE AI WiLL SoLvE GLoBaL WaRMinG
Mo🙄 retweeted
One of the best parts about Lula's victory in Brazil 🇧🇷 is watching in real time all those Polymarket/Kalshi bros eat shit and lose their money.
Fact check: GROTENDEELS ONWAAR
Het slim gebruik van "onder andere" noopt ons tot een mild oordeel.
Waarom heeft de overheid zo’n groot budgettair tekort? Dat is een vraag die ik vaak krijg.
Wel oa omdat de overheid schadevergoedingen toekent aan wie voor minstens 300€ schade heeft geleden door een van de volgende dieren:
Aalscholver of blauwe reiger – Bever – Das – Duif – Edelhert of damhert – Eend – Everzwijn – Gans – Konijn of haas – Kraaiachtige – Meerkoet of waterhoen – Meeuw – Ree – Steenmarter – Vleermuis – Vos – Wolf – Zangvogel – Zwaan.
#kerntaken
hln.be/oudsbergen/everzwijne…
📣 Het👏 zijn👏de👏pen👏sioe👏nen. 📣
The ugly truth about France and some of the other European countries currently in turmoil - and which none of the politicians want to admit because it'd be political suicide - is that you can't solve the problem by going after immigrants (as the right asserts) or the rich (as the left asserts), but you could solve it by going after the old.
One extraordinary statistic for you: people over 60 in France, a quarter of the population, own 60% of France's wealth, non-financial and financial (ofce.fr/pdf/revue/2025/3-192…).
And here is another crazy statistic:
that same quarter of the population, those above 60, receive nearly two-thirds of all social spending by the French government (previssima.fr/actualite/prot…) - which is famously among the highest in the world (France's government spending is an insane 57.3% of GDP).
Last statistic: they make up about 40% of voters because they're a third of registered voters (insee.fr/fr/statistiques/266…), and they turn out far more than anyone else (franceinfo.fr/elections/sond…).
Put our 3 statistics together and there's almost a bit of an apartheid situation here: the old own most of the country's wealth, collect most of the social spending and have the political power to keep it that way.
Which makes them a de-facto rentier class, living off assets and transfers paid for by younger generations.
And, of course, at the risk of stating a truism, the future is built by the young. Yet France keeps effectively taking money away from them to give it to those whose working lives are already behind them - and need the money far less since they already own the country's wealth.
What about inheritance, I hear you ask? That's the funniest/saddest aspect: given that life expectancy has kept rising, the French now inherit a home at 54 on average. The most common case is someone in their 80s leaving it to heirs in their 50s, in effect the very old transferring wealth to the about-to-be old (insee.fr/fr/statistiques/fic…).
You can add this to our earlier apartheid statement: on top of all the rest, even when the old finally let go of their wealth, it stays within their own "camp".
That's my personal situation, incidentally: I'm 42, my father is 71 and he is starting to look at ways to pass things on to me and my siblings, when our professional lives are already well settled, so it'll arrive when it changes things the least, which is pretty much the French system in a nutshell.
Now, I get that there'd be some unfairness in going after them: they paid into the system their entire working lives, playing by the rules of a social contract that told them if they paid up they'd collect at the end. Changing the rules now means breaking that promise, which is admittedly unfair.
But there's no magic wealth tree in any society: you can only take it where it is. That's the way most major societal transformations end up happening. They're often triggered by a catastrophic event (the so-called "four horsemen": mass-mobilisation war, revolution, state collapse, plague) BUT what really drives change is a transfer: wealth gets pried from the privileged class who've been sitting on it and handed to those who'll build what comes next.
So, in theory and in an ideal world, you can do without the catastrophic event and directly proceed with the transfer...
The fact that in France, and elsewhere in Europe, it's the youth protesting is probably no coincidence - even though they don't frame it as a generational fight. And even though, cruel irony, the left politicians many of them march behind promise to bring the retirement age back to 60 (lcp.fr/actualites/legislativ…), which would make the situation even worse.
Let's say they understand intuitively that the system is stacked against them, even if they haven't yet figured out how. And politicians are obviously doing what politicians do, meaning pandering to the people who actually vote, while pointing the young towards easier - and politically convenient - scapegoats.
To be clear I'm not saying it's the only problem in France, VERY far from it. I'm also not saying that all old people in France live a lavish lifestyle at the expense of younger generations: there are also plenty of very poor retirees who, if anything, would deserve more.
What I am saying is that it's probably the biggest elephant in the room: everyone can see it, nobody dares mention it - no politician, from any side, wants to run on cutting grandma's pension - and it makes every other problem harder to fix.
Mo🙄 retweeted
Remember, if the existence of AI forces everyone to spend a lot more just to keep doing the things they were doing before, that's a net negative for productivity even if the big labs make trillions in revenue.
🤡, exhibit 7438
🇺🇸 Pete Hegseth just got absolutely humiliated by Senator Tammy Duckworth!
Senator Tammy Duckworth, a retired U.S. Army lieutenant colonel who lost both legs while serving in Iraq, challenged Hegseth:
"I'm glad you brought that up. Can you name a single country that belongs to ASEAN and explain what agreement we have with it? And, by the way, how many countries are in ASEAN? Frankly, I'm not sure you even know who our allies are."
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth:
"Well, I can't give you the exact number, but I certainly know our allies in South Korea, Japan, and Australia..."
Senator Duckworth:
"None of the countries you just mentioned are members of ASEAN. I suggest you do your homework before engaging in these discussions."
And this is the kind of clueless bullshit running the Pentagon. Absolutely unbelievable.
Het is zover.
Wit-Rusland waarschuwt zijn burgers voor de veiligheid in België.
We zijn dus officieel van een land waar mensen naartoe vluchten, geëvolueerd naar een land waar mensen voor gewaarschuwd worden.
Ik zou zeggen dat we goed bezig zijn, maar straks krijgen we nog een negatief reisadvies van Noord-Korea.
't Is 't moment om de voormalige schoolmeester nog eens te taggen
@torfsrik
Deze redeneringen zie ik hier regelmatig passeren. 😭
Replying to @NKleinTijssink @BouboutYassine_
"Parijs 2026" is zoals "Iran 1979" want "Iran 1979".
Puike redenering. 👍
Lunch with friend, who only reads books, quality press and has well curated social media. She was shocked to learn that the earth is flat, 9/11 an inside job, Biden stole the elections and Trump is a 160 IQ genius. She hadn’t heard MSM report on any of this.
Replying to @Remcobus1967 @ClareMLopez
Lunch with older friend (Lifelong Dem) who only watches MSM. No social media presence. She was shocked when I discussed the violence/coordinated riots across Europe. Then I described all the fraud DOJ is exposing. She hadn’t heard MSM report on any of this.
Red pill lunch.
Mo🙄 retweeted
‘The misleading narrative of a pan-European revolt has consequences, because it allows images of unrest to be taken out of their national contexts and presented as proof that a chaotic Europe is ungovernable’
theguardian.com/commentisfre…
Except that in your crazy dystopian 1984 it will be Musk and the tech bro's that call the shots. It is their vision of utopia.
Musk it is not your savior (from Schwab, lol). He is your villain.
You don't understand anything happening in the US right now unless you read Elon Musk all the way through.
When he says that by 2036 money won't matter anymore, most people hear a billionaire's provocation. I hear something else.
Money is the fuel of every corruption system. Earmarked subsidies, public contracts negotiated behind closed doors, lobbies, front NGOs, regulatory rents. The day AI and robots produce more than humanity can consume, that lever disappears. And everyone who lives off that lever disappears with it.
There are a lot of them. And they've understood perfectly.
That's why we're now reading that Musk is preparing for "war" if Democrats take back Congress. He's not the one declaring war. It's an entire system that knows it's fighting for its survival.
Because we're at a turning point in human history. And there are only two ways out.
Either the Democrats win, and we enter 1984. A hyper-class that controls the AI models, the robot fleets, the data, the currency, and owns 99% of everything. Below them, the rest of humanity on life support, dependent on an income that can be granted and taken away. Klaus Schwab's Davos Forum summed up this world in one sentence: "You'll own nothing and you'll be happy." It's communism, except instead of promising equality, it embraces caste. And for the first time in history, a caste won't need the consent of the people to hold power: robots will do the policing, AI will do the surveillance.
Or we build a new order founded on merit, freedom, and private property. Where everyone remains the owner of their life, their work, and their share of the abundance. Where the collective ambition isn't managing scarcity, but understanding the universe and colonizing the cosmos. That's Elon Musk's project.
The technology is the same in both cases. What changes is who owns it.
Choose carefully which world you want to live in. And beware of socialists who promise to share the pie: they always end up keeping the knife.





























