Public Statement Regarding Reporting by The Atlantic
Regarding the article titled "Will Taiwan Just Give Up?" authored by Mr. Simon Shuster in The Atlantic, this public statement is hereby issued to clarify and address the selective quotes taken out of context and the decontextualized framing of Taiwan's defense reforms and Legislator Puma Shen:
Legislator Puma Shen was interviewed by Mr. Shuster on April 23 of this year, and a full audio recording of the interview has been retained for verification.
1.
To serve a narrative aimed at highlighting "Taiwanese draft-dodging," the article decontextualizes, exaggerates, and misrepresents Legislator Shen’s past experience of legally fulfilling his alternative civil service based on his professional expertise. Equating the legal and compliant alternative service system with "draft-dodging" is not only factually inaccurate, but also seriously misleads the international community's understanding of Taiwanese citizens' participation in national service.
2.
The article's quote stating that "people think it's a waste of time" is completely stripped of its original context. At the time, Legislator Shen explicitly referred to the outdated, ritualistic military training of the past—riddled with chores like cutting grass prior to recent defense reforms—rather than dismissing the intrinsic value of military service or suggesting a lack of public resolve to defend the nation. This framing dismisses the efforts of the government and Taiwanese society in addressing past systemic inefficiencies, as well as the MOD’s ongoing commitment to defense reforms and the conscription system, making it highly misleading.
Journalistic professionalism and ethics must be built on objective, complete, and contextually grounded reporting, particularly when addressing critical issues such as regional security and democratic resilience. We call on international media outlets to respect factual context when reporting on Taiwan's national defense and will to defend itself, and to refrain from using decontextualized techniques to shape biased narratives.
Mr.Friday retweeted
澳洲ABC,英国BBC,中国凤凰卫视,日本ANN,来自四个直播源的普习金畅聊器官移植与长生不老话题的画面:
普京:“再过几年啊,这个生物技术再这样发展,人类的器官会不断地移植,甚至越活越年轻,甚至可以长生不老!”
习近平:“预测呢,本世纪呢,可能,将来可以活到150岁!”
粉红会说都是AI吗🤔?
Mr.Friday retweeted
Some of the most successful people in the United States are from minority groups.
America is the land of opportunity 🇺🇸
Twitter app is so annoying. I don’t want to listen to the space thing and it kept showing up when I scroll my feed
1
617
今天我帶的一個工程師在預估的時候竟說一個功能他要spike不知道多久會做完….(說什麼沒寫過regular expression ,遇到一個百行的AST parser不會處理)…
我趁下個meeting 的空檔,打開vs code,10分鐘內送了一個pull request 給他,就是他說要研究的功能
如果你是這個engineer,你的反應是?
沒想到前個推這麼多人回,我仔細回覆一下:
1/ 盈運模式稱為ACO,最重要的目的是在維持病患健康的前提下降低醫療成本。保險公司(主要是Medicare)每年會預測該區域病患未來ㄧ年的可能醫療開支。屆時開支有節省且可追溯到先前的醫療行為,節省的開支將分紅給診所及提供病患管理的服務商(我們)。
對了,我們公司叫 aledade.com
最近一次融資是E round 約3.1B
EBITDA 已經為正很久了。醫療行業對景氣循環的抵抗力比較高些,正在招人。
我自己覺得美國在這方面最有趣的是會用錢去解決錢的問題。
美國的醫療浪費眾所周知;其中一個痛點在fee for service的設計,病患住院越久收費越高,對醫院來說是誘因但對病人卻不見得是。
ACO的設計是透過「節省」來賺錢;如果省下的開支越多,在最前線的家庭醫生拿的越多。
1
5
666
沒想到前個推這麼多人回,我仔細回覆一下:
1/ 盈運模式稱為ACO,最重要的目的是在維持病患健康的前提下降低醫療成本。保險公司(主要是Medicare)每年會預測該區域病患未來ㄧ年的可能醫療開支。屆時開支有節省且可追溯到先前的醫療行為,節省的開支將分紅給診所及預測的服務商(我們)。關鍵字:ACO
5
930









