Much4Less retweeted
Replying to @Nivlek79104957 @KeezTheFlex
Yeah okay Brazil cuck, do you actually have an argument against what I said or just preaches?
1
10
Replying to @GlorySpaceCakes @ShitpostRock
Or just be Nintendo and have an army of braindead customers who’ll buy every game and console you produce
1
16
Replying to @Nivlek79104957 @KeezTheFlex
Not really, I just like to argue with Nintendo fanboys and making them mad. I don’t consider what I do wrong and my reasoning is solid
1
5
No shoplifting is stealing because the goods are SCARCE. This is the only fact that matters, everything you just pulled out of your ass is contradictory nonsense.
The storefront is not a contract that transfers title to a non-existent property right. Copying a digital pattern is not theft of a scarce good.
Property rights exist only to resolve conflicts over scarce, rivalrous means. A physical item on a shelf is scarce: taking it excludes the owner from using that particular good. A digital file, idea, or pattern is not. Your copy leaves the original intact. No conflict arises over any scarce resource, so nothing is stolen.
Contracts transfer title to alienable scarce property. They do not create property rights in non-scarce information. A “storefront fee” or terms-of-service notice is at best a conditional grant of access to a server or medium. Once the pattern is obtained, restricting what you do with your own computer, hard drive, or brain is either a bare promise (unenforceable) or an attempt to impose a negative servitude on resources you already own. Default is not aggression against any homesteaded title.
The shoplifting analogy collapses for the same reason. Physical inventory is finite and rivalrous. Digital copies are not. “The store will always have more” is false for scarce goods and irrelevant for non-scarce ones. You never took a product; you used your own means to reproduce a pattern that was never exclusively owned
2
Replying to @Nivlek79104957 @KeezTheFlex
I also said multiple times that I would buy the game and dump it myself if Nintendo weren’t such bastards that constantly sabotage the emulation scene. I won’t support a company that constantly abuses their IP rights
1
10
Replying to @ShitpostRock
Depends on the mods, if it’s just bug fixes then this statement is only partly true
48












