Wota (ܘܐܠܝܕ)

We actually have more solid evidences than that. Which is that God is logically necessary (i.e denying His existence leads to a rational impossibility which is to say that possible existences can exist without an extrinsic specifier)

Human descending from a common ancestors with chimpanzees is in no way established. I can easily say Islam is true because of the many proofs we have for God’s existence etc… and as I said we put reason before empiricism, and evolution doesn’t escape the problem of induction.

The amount of air I received is enough to freeze the earth na’am.

I'll be more active on my alt @wotoragain

قُلْ أَرُونِيَ الَّذِينَ أَلْحَقْتُم بِهِ شُرَكَاءَ كَلَّا بَلْ هُوَ اللَّهُ الْعَزِيزُ الْحَكِيمُ "Say, "Show me those whom you have attached to Him as partners. No! Rather, He [alone] is Allah, the Exalted in Might, the Wise." "(Quran 34:27)

Sup

Leaving Twitter for a while, salam aleykum.

Well, wasn't that difficult to choose kek

Feels weird to be taught Darwinian evolution in class kek.

When you start questioning your whole existence after a bad decision

I miss taraweeh in the mosque, man...

You don't have to refute infinite regress when arguing from contingency, realising that was very helpful.

Learning how to defend your belief should be a must.

If there's at very least 1 created being, an uncreated being must exist. If there's 1 dependent being, an independent being must exist. If there was a universe with just one rock in it, it will enough evidence to establish the existence of an uncreated, independent creator.

Philosophy >>>>science Cry about it

Oh no...

My religious path: Islam.

Because He wants to.