We are a group of vibrant students at Notre Dame High School in Toronto whose focus is on advocacy, law and leadership.
12 Malvern Ave
Joined September 2022
- Tweets97
- Following63
- Followers32
- Likes24
Happening Now! Mini Mock United Nations at ND as students critically solve an international humanitarian crisis. @TCDSB @Equity_TCDSB @NDHSbeach
NDHSLawT0 retweeted
We're thrilled to announce that the annual OJEN Bursary Program is now receiving applications!
22 bursaries are available for graduating high school students in Ontario who are interested in legal careers.
For application and more information, visit: ojen.ca/en/program/bursaries…
ND student Lyla Nolan, member of the Notre Dame law council, demonstrated her strong advocacy skills representing Scarborough South West in Model Parliament for the Legislative Assembly of Ontario. Congrats Lyla! @NDHSbeach @floracifelli @TCDSB
If the employer requires that work be in person then it should be agreed upon before hiring. @OJEN_ROEJ #OJENROEJFA23
Flexibility in the workplace provides equal opportunities, treatment and protection from discrimination and complies with the Ontario Human Rights Code #Equity for All #OJENROEJFA23 @OJEN_ROEJ
1
127
-In person mandatory work requirements, can now be perceived as restricting a person’s freedom of choice and right to live as they choose infringing sec. 7 of the Charter. #OJENROEJFA23 @OJEN_ROEJ
90
Good Afternoon! In order to mandate an in-person work requirement, an employer must show that the “in- person work environment” is a necessary requirement for the job! @OJEN_ROEJ #OJENROEJFA23
1
113
NDHSLawT0 retweeted
We invite high school students in Ontario to join the TwitterX Moot, OJEN's online debate! On November 22, students will engage in a discussion about: Can mandatory in-person work policies violate the Charter?
Teachers, find more information here: ojen.ca/en/program/twitter-m…
Congratulations to ND Law Students for an incredible Moot! Visit the hashtag #OJENROEJSP23 and scroll through our debate discussing whether or not section 33 of the Charter should be repealed. @NDHSbeach @marroumt @SOArea6_TCDSB @Mrs_DAddario @TCDSB_RDAddario
Supreme Court of Reference - asks the SCC for advice on the use of Sec. 33 and provides more limitations and acceptable use.
Sec. 33 if used incorrectly puts our democracy at risk! #OJENROEJSP23 @OJEN_ROEJ
2
183
NDHSLawT0 retweeted
Really articulate!
Rather than stoking a constitutional crisis through disallowance, a Supreme Court Reference reference would allow the federal government to de-escalate tensions and, most importantly, clarify the scope of the notwithstanding clause. #OJENROEJSP23 @OJEN_ROEJ @NDHSbeach
Rather than stoking a constitutional crisis through disallowance, a Supreme Court Reference reference would allow the federal government to de-escalate tensions and, most importantly, clarify the scope of the notwithstanding clause. #OJENROEJSP23 @OJEN_ROEJ @NDHSbeach
When can section 33 be used?
How does the word “notwithstanding” in Sec. 33 relate to the words “notwithstanding anything” in Sec. 28’s equal rights guarantee? How can the clause be amended? #OJENROEJSP23 @OJEN_ROEJ @NDHSbeach
2
235
...and the Ford government has attempted to use it more than once, most recently trying to restrict the right to strike A Supreme Court reference is a must! #OJENROEJSP23 @OJEN_ROEJ @NDHSbeach @marroumt
1
168