We are balls deep in a perceptual counter-intelligence campaign that began hundreds of thousands of years ago at the very inception of humanity's origins. I know Anjali to be an extraordinary, good, and authentic person. She is NOT a liar, and the intel she conveys is authentically the intel she receives, very likely from genuine NHI. I also do not suspect, for a second, that her own biases are warping or distorting the conveyance of the information she shares. Where I disagree is with the trustworthiness and the moral intelligence of the message itself (I do not distrust or doubt the morality of Anjali, even remotely). The message: The sun is conscious and is taking moral action to extinguish humanity in reaction to its collective moral iniquity and we all deserve this outcome (no one is innocent) and we also should NOT employ our individual agency to overturn, prevent, or protect against the inevitable virtual extinction, because "collectively," "we" have already chosen this fate for ourselves and it is in some oxymoronic way ALSO not our place to attempt to understand the greater moral grand design, or question it, because we are just too stupid to understand or morally reason our way through it, and, yet, we are also simultaneously FULLY morally culpable. One side argues: This obvious, paralogical, thought disorder and logical contradiction that cannot be reconciled is in truth a morally and intellectually inferior being practicing intellectual and moral hubris and over-extending its agency beyond what is appropriate or good for "the collective." The other side (where I stand) argues: A morally superior being who fails to logically and morally reason and also depends on its own subjects self-imposing moral and intellectual lobotomy is likely parasitic, at best, and an inferior, unworthy, unrightfully asymmetrically advantaged slaver, adversary, torturer, genocidal Munchausen by proxy parent, at worst.