New Zealand Loyal

Threats and Admission Of Murder - Kelvyn Alp takes Fake NZ Loyal to the Depths Of Depravity

“A Very Dark Soul”: Speaking Out on Kelvyn Alp & Fake NZ Loyal For three years, Alp has tried to steal the real New Zealand Loyal with his Fake NZL bot-generated slop. He has failed. Dismally. Viewer discretion is advised - foul and threatening language. Not suitable for Parliament, or leadership in NZ, in any way.

Exposing Stalking and Intimidation Within the NZ "Freedom" Movement Every New Zealander who cares about the truth and the cause of freedom in our country, in the lead-up to the 2026 election, needs to watch this. The infiltration of darkness is not just within the old political parties; it has also come over into the freedom movement. This is a wake-up call to heighten your ability to think critically and to piece together the dark jigsaw puzzle that now represents the full-blown “information warfare” to which we are being subjected here. If you see a cult-like group all spouting the same rhetoric, you can know that the narrative is being managed from the top. Please watch this and share it everywhere to help more Kiwis awaken to the darkness, so that we can bring the Light back again.

Barry Young: The Safest Vaccine Site in New Zealand Was Right Next to Parliament @BarryYoungNZ explains the detailed statistical analysis he performed on the New Zealand vaccination data. Using the same tools an epidemiologist would employ - graphs, confidence intervals, Poisson scores, p-values and Standardised Mortality Rates (SMRs) - he examined both the national picture and individual vaccination sites. While the overall data showed excess mortality, results varied sharply by location: some sites recorded significantly elevated deaths, others performed better than expected. The standout finding was that the single best-performing site in the entire country - the one with the lowest (and even favourable) mortality statistics - was located in Wellington Central, right in the seat of government. Barry notes that this variation suggests the doses were not uniform across New Zealand and raises the unresolved question of why the centre nearest Parliament produced such markedly different results. A clear, data-driven examination of what site-level analysis reveals. Transcript: “I was thinking, well, as an epidemiologist, how would they look at this data? What would they do? What tools would they use? How would they analyse it? So I went through, did all the card and for it, got the nice graphs, charts, analysis, numbers, confidence intervals, Poisson scores, all the p-values, all that stuff to work out the probabilities and all the rest of it. To work out if it was dangerous, SMRs, standardised mortality rates. You know, one is normal. SMR1 should be one to one mortality rate before and after the vaccine. You’ve got the same number of people alive, same number of people alive after the vaccine. That’s an SMR1. If it’s SMR higher than one, you’ve got more people dying after the vaccine than should die after the vaccine. SMR less than one, there’s more people living - Vaccines working, great. So that’s how it works. That’s the SMR. So anyway, I did all of that analysis and provided it for multiple sites across New Zealand. So I was doing it specifically by site. So I’ve done the work for the whole data in general, which shows excess mortality. But I also did it for certain sites in New Zealand, some bad ones, some not so bad, some very, very good. Just to show that my analysis was whole and correct and valid and validated everything, because some sites I looked at, mortality was not elevated. It was actually less than expected, which is like, OK, it proves my method works. It’s accurate. It is picking out the bad ones, the really bad ones. It’s also picking out some good ones as well. But there are far fewer good ones than there are bad ones. And the key thing to see here, I don’t think I’ve discussed this. The key thing to realise is that the good one, the really good one, the star of the show and the whole of New Zealand, the best site was in Wellington Central itself, the seat of the government, the heart of the city. So go figure, why did that have the best mortality statistics in the whole entire database? [Liz Gunn] Barry, that’s extraordinary... What we are saying here is the jab that... I call them the poison shots. The shots were not the same across the country. There were certain areas that seemed to get much stronger, much stronger shots that had a much more significant and immediate effect, maybe over the next six months. We’re talking about deaths here, but if we could analyse the data on turbo cancers, on heart conditions, we could see if we could really do a deep, deep dive, if this government were open and caring about the people, we could see that certain parts of the country have been much harder hit than others. [Barry Young] That’s the job of the government. That’s safety monitoring. That’s what they should be doing. [Liz Gunn] And we are saying that near parliament in Wellington and Central Wellington, that jab Centre was the safest. It’s a bizarre coincidence. It probably had something like a saline solution could have been a possibility. We don’t know until we investigate, but the question mark remains. [Barry Young] Could have been the safest vaccine in the world. That is just so cynical. It is a bizarre, bizarre coincidence.”

Barry Young tells Christopher Luxon that his time is up - describing him as a one-term Prime Minister who has admitted he doesn’t need the job - and adds the blunt farewell: “Don’t let the door hit you on the way out.” He then turns to Winston Peters with a more hopeful appeal, urging him to “do the right thing for New Zealand,” look at the data, and help make the country whole again. Barry tells Peters that doing so would secure a lasting legacy and allow him to be remembered as a great man. A clear, personal call for political courage and data transparency.

Exposing the liars & the fakes. Kelvyn Alp is not the new leader of New Zealand Loyal. They can scream and insult all they like. These fakes look ridiculous. You simply cannot steal someone else's political party. Grow up and put your own name out in the marketplace. Don't take ours.