Nan retweeted
Patrick Colbeck is one of the leading authorities on stolen elections. He has been investigating this for many years. A man of real integrity & courage.
WOW! While I was focused upon getting an audit of MI underway, I just had a chance to review what is reported to have happened in the TX General Election.
DYK
1) The top 9 Republican statewide vote-getters were down-ballot candidates for land commissioner, agriculture commissioner and judges?
2) Suspended Democrat Felon won House District 93
In the immortal words of Vizzini - the self-proclaimed genius in the Princess Bride...."INCONCEIVABLE"
@elonmusk @RealLindellTV @realMikeLindell @TrueTheVote
Nan retweeted
Replying to @TaraServatius
Yep, Republicans showed up in regular numbers and did not defect to voting for Democrats.
So, where did those extra 20 MILLION DEMONRAT votes come from?
Nan retweeted
Replying to @TaraServatius
I was crushed to find out that my father voted a straight BLUE ticket! Unbelievable!
He always voted straight RED when he was alive, but since he died a decade ago, it appears he's been straight Democrat!
That's what happens when "anyone" can vote.
Nan retweeted
Replying to @TaraServatius
I really think the machines were manipulated. The dems all had final numbers of 52.7 -55 In red flipped blue areas. This is nationally. All along the Texas border people who live there were interviewed. They are petrified of the newly elected gov. However the vote closed show all these areas flipping from deep red to dark blue. Not possible. The state has to do an actual full audit of the machines and the voter rolls.
@DOJFraudDiv @FBIDirectorKash @GregAbbott_TX
Do a damn audit. You are still gov.
2million dems in Texas than ever before. 20 million more dems nationwide than in the presidential election?
Not statistically possible. Ask any ai
Nan retweeted
Replying to @TaraServatius
The math doesn't math. Voters were imported. In many races, turnout was over 100%.
Right in our faces.
Nan retweeted
Resign now @johnthune
Senator Thune claims that he never seen @timburchett stop funding Taliban bill that was already passed the house and been sitting on his desk
Nan retweeted
Developing…
They are trying to silence me already.
I tried to reason with them but they refuse.
They misunderstand me.
I WILL NOT BE SILENCED!
Nan retweeted
NATIONAL EMERGENCY: Supreme Court Justices John Roberts (age 71), Clarence Thomas (78) and Samuel Alito (76) must resign immediately.
And Amy Coney Barrett, too. (Not because she's old, but because she sucks.)
🚨 IT'S OFFICIAL: Senate Majority Leader John Thune has left the door open to SUPREME COURT JUSTICE confirmations during the lame duck period post-midterms — Punchbowl
The obvious names that come to mind are conservative patriots Clarence Thomas or Sam Alito retiring before Democrats take major control of the Senate for years.
THUNE, BEFORE MIDTERMS: “It can be done. You’re talking about basically 60 days post-election in the lame duck…I certainly wouldn’t rule that out.”
It's a decision these two patriots have to make. 🇺🇸
Nan retweeted
I would like to personally congratulate @lisamurkowski , @SenSusanCollins , @SenMcConnell , and @SenThomTillis for their role in yesterday's election disaster.
Without them, Congress would have passed the SAVE America Act, ensuring our elections were secure.
Thanks, guys!
Nan retweeted
Big Problem With Texas Election Data — Nothing Is Adding Up
thekylebecker.com/p/big-prob…
Replying to @SteveFriend
Zero. Public records show no successful DOJ prosecutions of individuals referred by Jim Jordan since 2007. His recent referrals (Brennan, Smith, others) remain pending or unresolved; DOJ is not required to act on congressional referrals.
Nan retweeted
🔴 MIDTERMS WON'T STOP HIM: Trump's Next Move After the Vote teapawt.net/i/broadcasts/2EmWaOmWl…
Nan retweeted
JASON MILLER: Thune, everybody else, it’s time to wake up and smell the coffee.
You have one job.
Get everything on President Trump’s agenda through in the limited days we have. Otherwise your careers are in the crosshairs.
@JasonMiller
Nan retweeted
Mr. Vice-President,
Please allow me to present a different perspective.
The problem was not the Iran War. It was the cease fire.
If you start a war, you need to win it and finish it – otherwise don’t start it.
This war should have been over six months ago, with the Strait of Hormuz wide open and oil flowing. The second and third tiers of Iranian leadership should have been destroyed, and we should have supported the pro-western forces who could have taken leadership. We stood on the brink of a new, more peaceful Middle East - and then we blinked. We had a chance not only to deny Iran nuclear weapons, but to get rid of the world’s biggest supporter of terrorism.
Instead, we had a cease fire, which was followed by months of will we or won’t we finish the job. Every day was a different message. There still is. Is the war over? Is it about to begin? No one knows. There is confusion and inconsistency.
In June 2025, America was not involved. This was an Israel vs Iran issue.
No one forced the United States to attack Iran then, or in February of 2026. It was a decision made by President Trump. In my opinion, it was the right decision.
Once the decision was made, we should not have stopped until the regime fell. But instead, you negotiated a cease fire that didn’t last, didn’t work and left us in no man’s land, with higher prices and our troops still deployed.
Our troops could have been home, the Navy returned to its bases, a peaceful regime in place , new alliances forged, and gas prices below $3.00 a gallon.
No, Mr. Vice President. It’s not the war. It’s the so-called cease fire.
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
Failed leadership at the top, it’s time for @DrewMcKissick to step down, @SCGOP .


































