ENS v2 için upgrade ettim sanırım nft veriyor bir de. ENS isimlerinizi upgrade edebilirsiniz birkaç dolar tutuyor. 800 küsür kişi upgrade etmiş görünüyor. 👇 app.ens.domains/

Drop number 1. 20 TurboCard codes. First come, first served. ZZm7dvp2Mnza J-SHWlW_9VUL xOqFybMt32jQ mkCiMgbE19Ut btjzW8-c6g5G DiR0wmmMB8Ue YhtfxV-11x3U wGwHjwEXNE8u 0QAhFtKCfJpu AGE2zDSTNKvK dozMopS2KkAA Ve3wla_zgpac RYV20H9Nzc5P Qr8I0C492mcl YUlxl-EhvegG JhRTQ_ed1FGC 5DBDZKa0iPo7 ewMTEfknxu_M l2KUSisEp7El ixcKpRTDJZWG

Last month, we demonstrated high-rate alchemy: turning mercury into real, stable gold, beating CERN’s record by a factor of 10. Last week, we enriched isotopes in the world’s most powerful plasma centrifuge, beating the Soviet record that stood for 40 years. Now, we’re building a fusion reactor in San Francisco to achieve record power density.

One piece is in. The rest are out there. Keep an eye on your timeline and find them all 🧩

This is craazy. I asked one of our PhD engineers to look into NEAR *Confidential* Intents wondering how they designed their system. Unredacted, word-for-word, this was his answer 😱😱😱 "Everything I found out about the privacy claims and confidential intents is so bad that it seems almost comical and I cannot believe what I am seeing. Apparently they run a completely separate instance of the protocol, which is called FAR (as an opposite to NEAR), and that has a permissioned operator set. The entire confidentiality claim seems to rest upon the fact that it is a permissioned chain and the nodes are trusted to keep things private, there doesn't seem to be any deep technology behind it and it also does not seem to be open source. The entities running the nodes are also not publicly known. I almost feel weird writing this because it is so absurdly bad that it feels like ... I don't know ... a simulation? I know the usual level of overpromising in Web3 but this is so many levels beyond believable that it still feels unreal."

She who waits beneath the desert... 👁️👁️👁️ #1001Mizan #1001threadsofmizan

Some codes are being sent out to our early supporters, others will be released over twitter & Discord drops. Mint page: turbocards.getoptimum.xyz/op… Discord: discord.gg/4m2QKpGW8g The first set of access codes drops this Friday 10/23 and there will be more to follow. Codes work on a first come first served basis, so turn post notifications on if you want the best shot at minting.

Batman!!!

Adamı gerçekten buldular sanırım. Hack'leyen cüzdan Signal üzerinden konuşalım demiş.

NFT’nin ID ve cüzdan public (Bence asıl gizli olması gereken kısım). NFT görseli sadece sahibine gözüküyor ( İsterse Public yapabilir, yeni sahipleri tekrar gizli yapamaz) NFT Rare/Legendary vs olsa bile sahibi dışında kimse bunu göremiyor. Satınalınca cüzdana gelen NFT görsel ve class'ını görmen yaklaşık 19 dk sürüyor. Zcash mainnette mümkün olmayan NFT'lerin satışından sonra bakalım bu nasıl olacak. Hype olunca herşey kazandırıyor 😀

Starknet should become its own L1 with hash-based security at the core. AI is pulling the quantum clock forward (see ecdsa fail). Ethereums answer is end of 2029 and Bitcoin hasnt given one. Starknet could be there by 2027 if it stops waiting for others to move first. so whats post-quantum money?

Today I call upon the blockchain industry to calmly begin planning for "bunker mode". My personal recommendation is to set in motion a controlled mass migration of assets to fresh addresses, i.e. addresses whose pubkeys remain hidden behind a hash. Holders, starting with large and sophisticated ones, should consider moving the bulk of their funds to addresses that have never signed a transaction. And when they do sign one, they should also move remaining funds to a new address (possibly generated from the same seed phrase). Don't rush. While I believe there is cause for action a rushed migration would do more harm than good. Don't panic either. Moving assets to protected addresses is a simple, preventative step which does not require new cryptography or new wallets. IMO it is now reasonable to brace for the possibility that ECDSA breaks before qday, in the worst case in months not years. By "break" I mean fast private key recovery (e.g. in one week) on available hardware (e.g. a large GPU cluster). Recent days have been humbling for human mathematical intuition. Long-held, unquestioned hypotheses have fallen. This includes the n log(n) bound for integer multiplication and the 3SUM conjecture. In hindsight, May's unexpected disproof of the Erdős unit distance conjecture was our warning shot. Yesterday's OpenAI drop made it clear that mathematical superintelligence is upon us. They say there are weeks where decades happen. We are about to live through weeks where centuries of mathematical progress happen. Could our magic 64-byte ECDSA signatures be too good to be true? Was it just security through obscurity all this time? Elliptic curves feel especially vulnerable to superintelligence. Curves carry rich structure, with room for fancy tricks like Schoof, Frobenius, pairings. (By contrast, hashes are designed to minimise algebraic structure.) Separately, as Ewin Tang can attest, an efficient quantum algorithm sometimes foreshadows an efficient classical one. We should be open to the possibility of a classical counterpart to Shor that breaks elliptic curves and RSA at once. Also noteworthy is the striking under-representation of cryptographic breakthroughs among the 722 mathematical results OpenAI published. I've witnessed first-hand the US government censoring academic quantum cryptanalysis results. Backroom interventionism is my base case. I urge large, sophisticated actors to lead by example. Project11's "risq list" (bitcoin-risq-list.projecteleven[.]com) is a great tracker of exposed BTC pubkeys. Binance, Bitbank, Robinhood, Bitfinex, and Tether have an opportunity to harden their cold storage. Next month I'll address institutions in London in a live Q&A (forum.ethereuminstitutional[.]org/london-2026). Again, please do not rush. Wallets holding under 50 BTC enjoy partial cover from "Satoshi's shield", i.e. his 20K exposed addresses that hold 50 BTC each. Load-bearing signers like oracles and L2 security councils should consider rotating ECDSA pubkeys with every signed message and/or multi-signing with a hash-based schemes like SPHINCS. Exiting bunker mode safely will require post-AI cryptography. My inclination is to go all-in on hash-based cryptography and avoid structured mathematical assumptions entirely, whether from curves, lattices, or isogenies. A single battle-tested hash (e.g. from the SHA or BLAKE families) yields plausible post-AI security. The Ethereum roadmap on strawmap[.]org fully embraces hash-based cryptography with end-to-end formal verification as a response to the quantum threat. Those timelines must now be revisited and accelerated in light of mathematical superintelligence. I'll be pushing for maximum defensive acceleration.

Free Mint Data (Sold Under $10). This minted out approximately 3 hours ago. This is the data as of now. > Community + CM Listed > Allocation + Sold (Under $10) The most important metric is the percentage of wallets sold under $10. Feel free to tag anyone, idc. I’ve been here a long time, gave away millions of dollars on spaces. I don’t care what you, your CM, or community think. I’ve likely given back more to the NFT space than your entire community combined. There will be MANY more free mints that I will arrange collabs for. This data is valuable to reward holders for future opportunities and to ensure these teams are getting allocations for those who want to support post-mint. This data is publicly available on the blockchain, and is for research and review purposes only.

bu geldi 1 near mint price 666 supply. bakın bi dyor.