
Political Scientist ⚠️ inactive account, moved to: @nilssteiner.bsky.social
Mainz, Germany
Joined September 2013
- Tweets1.5K
- Following1.1K
- Followers1.5K
- Likes2.9K
Pinned Tweet
Happy to see this out in @EJPRjournal: ejpr.onlinelibrary.wiley.com….
There are lots of discussions on the so-called "losers of globalization".
But: Do citizens actually self-categorize in that way? Who does? And with what consequences?
We study this for Germany using @gles_data.
Nils Steiner retweeted
we first show how democrats and republicans sort into distinctive colleges, majors, occupations, industries, and employers. at each stage of their trajectory through the labor market, democrats and republicans are making different decisions. we can see this in great detail.
Nils Steiner retweeted
Why did Trump win? How well did we predict the MAGA landslide? What to expect from President Trump 2.0?
We'll host a virtual roundtable on this @InFER_Frankfurt @goetheuni with @NilsSteiner, @MaryStegmaier, Herbert Kitschelt, & Sigrid Roßteutscher. Do join us for this event!
Nils Steiner retweeted
Voter turnout declined in 42 states & DC. It rose in only 7 states, 4 of them battlegrounds (GA, PA, MI, & WI)
Nils Steiner retweeted
more americans in the lowest income brackets voting republican instead of democrat, for the first time in decades:
Nils Steiner retweeted
We’re going to hear lots of stories about which people, policies and rhetoric are to blame for the Democrats’ defeat.
Some of those stories may even be true!
But an underrated factor is that 2024 was an absolutely horrendous year for incumbents around the world 👇
"Decomposing nostalgic deprivation into different dimensions, we find that while social, economic and power deprivation have different antecedents, each predicts populist attitudes and voting behaviour."
🆕 Nostalgic deprivation and #populism
Jeremy Ferwerda, @_JustinGest & Tyler Reny use original surveys across 19 European countries 🗺️ to demonstrate that perceptions of declining status 📉 are a consistent predictor of #populist support.
👉 bit.ly/3UG0BsU #OA
Nils Steiner retweeted
Welche Rolle spielt die #Inflation für Wahlen, wie die von Donald #Trump, und für die nächste #Bundestagswahl?
Ein 🧵 1/n :
Nils Steiner retweeted
It seems that Trump has won the male Hispanic vote. This shows the "circumstantial" nature of their "ethnic liberalism" -- illiberals can attract minorities when they provide them entry into the majority, effacing their minority status.
This nicely shows that Trump winning all seven swing states was in no way an unexpected scenario given the polling data (and models based on those): In fact, the most likely swing state combination in Nate Silver's prediction model.
Politicians tend to think: "voters are unfair in their retrospective assessments of politicians’ performance, identity oriented rather than policy oriented, retrospective, egocentric, single-issue-focused, leader oriented, relatively uninformed, and oriented to the short term."
Now in @apsrjournal: What do politicians think about their voters? Fielding face-to-face surveys to 982 sitting politicians in 11 countries, and surveys of 12,000 citizens, we find they have remarkably consistent - and cynical - theories of voters: /1
doi.org/10.1017/S00030554240…
Nils Steiner retweeted
As people assess the election outcome, it's good to keep in mind that the most accurate prediction (on a state-by-state level too) seems to be @pete_enns et al. forecast, based on economic fundamentals and incumbent approval. doi.org/10.1017/S10490965240…
My 2024 election forecast published in @ps_polisci @CUP_PoliSci with @JuliusLagodny, @jcolner99, and Anusha Kumar correctly forecasted 45/45 called states 100 days before the election using @verasight_data: bit.ly/40vsasH.
Nils Steiner retweeted
Who do Europeans want to win the US presidential election?
🇩🇰 Harris 81% / Trump 7%
🇸🇪 Harris 73% / Trump 13%
🇩🇪 Harris 71% / Trump 14%
🇪🇸 Harris 65% / Trump 17%
🇫🇷 Harris 62% / Trump 15%
🇬🇧 Harris 61% / Trump 16%
🇮🇹 Harris 46% / Trump 24%
yougov.co.uk/politics/articl…
Nils Steiner retweeted
I have the honor to share the Handbook of Affective Polarization that I co-edit with @EelcoHarteveld.
It is open access, pre-registered preprint:
Torcal, M., & Harteveld, E. (2024, November 1). Handbook of Affective Polarization. doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/rh29…
@UPFBarcelona @RECSM_UPF
Nils Steiner retweeted
Can We Believe the Polls?
We can't use the logic of random sampling anymore. Weighting is changing but still may not work.
New #ScienceOfPolitics podcast/transcript with @b_schaffner & Michael Bailey
niskanencenter.org/can-we-be…
Nils Steiner retweeted
Here is a remarkable demonstration of how much a pollster's choices affect the results.
@joshclinton took a single poll and depending on the weighting scheme, he could change the Harris-Trump margin by as much as *8 points*.
goodauthority.org/news/elect…
Nils Steiner retweeted
just released: national estimates from CES pre-election interviews with over 70k american adults
National LVs (Oct. 1 - 25):
Harris: 51%
Trump: 47%
Dynamic crosstabs: cooperativeelectionstudy.shi…
Release: sites.tufts.edu/cooperativee…
Nils Steiner retweeted
Billionaires own about 4% of US wealth, but contributed 1/3 of the money raised by Trump, a billionaire himself. The triumph of plutocracy, in real time
An FT analysis of campaign finance filings found that roughly a third of all of the money raised by the Trump campaign and allied groups came from billionaires, while billionaires represented 6% of the money raised by Harris groups. on.ft.com/4e62tlo
Nils Steiner retweeted
I am betting this topic will be the key discussion in 5-10 years almost everywhere.
So far most people still don't realize
- how dramatic the decline in fertility really is
- what that means for social security systems and generally growth prospects
Birth rates are plummeting,
The UN and other forecasters keep missing the mark
Fertility in Latin America has dropped off a cliff.
Do we need to update our models?
Asks @jburnmurdoch
Nils Steiner retweeted
New Publication @WEPsocial:
In this paper, I analyze cohort differences in consideration sets: Do newer generations *consider* voting for more and different parties than earlier generations?
Spoiler alert: Yes to both! 👇🧵
tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.…



































