Question 3 is a risky and costly Constitutional Amendment on Nevada's November 2018 statewide ballot. For more information, please visit https://xitter.cf/t.co/Ta0MNIYDw6

Joined January 2018
The results are in: Question 3 has been defeated! Thank you to voters for taking the time to look into the facts on this risky and costly proposal. We couldn’t have done this without you!
1
13
7
49
Consumer advocates oppose Question 3 because it would eliminate existing consumer protections that help Nevada's most vulnerable populations get access to affordable, reliable electricity. bit.ly/2qmnlj8
6
9
A diverse group of Nevadans from across the state have come together to oppose Question 3.
2
4
2
13
Tomorrow, polls open at 7:00 a.m. - get there early and beat the lines to vote NO on Question 3! bit.ly/2Pxub3x
6
9
Question 3 would shut down Nevada's existing rooftop solar program. Vote NO on 3. bit.ly/2AIRajO
2
7
12
Question 3 would threaten clean energy projects across Nevada, including Nevada's existing rooftop solar program. bit.ly/2Rxm1FA
3
3
Today is the last day for early voting in Nevada! Beat the crowds and get to the polls to vote NO on 3! bit.ly/2dSFuS9
3
7
Electricity deregulation under Question 3 would cause electric rates to increase all across the state. Please vote NO on 3. bit.ly/2CQfh1r
1
5
1
4
Nevada's existing electricity system is a leader in renewable energy. Question 3 would put that at risk. bit.ly/2Qbf4cV
2
5
12
Tomorrow is the last day for early voting in Nevada! Remember to show up and vote NO on Question 3. bit.ly/2dSFuS9
1
5
4
Question 3 would be bad for all Nevadans. Please join us and vote NO on 3. bit.ly/2Jq9qBj
1
3
8
Question 3 would increase electricity rates across Nevada, costing the average family hundreds more per year. Please vote NO on 3. bit.ly/2OikD7E
3
2
5
Question 3 would lock electricity deregulation into Nevada's constitution, making it harder to fix when things go wrong. bit.ly/2RT5mNz
6
4
2
5
Not only does Question 3 do nothing for renewable energy, it would increase Nevada's dependence on out-of-state fossil fuels. bit.ly/2OoSl0e
2
3
1
8
Former Nevada Secretary of State Ross Miller opposes Question 3 because it would dismantle and deregulate Nevada’s existing electric system. bit.ly/2RjoDH3
35
25
5
105
Still undecided about Question 3? Take this short voter test to help make up your mind. bit.ly/2POclWR
1
4
1
8
Question 3 would be especially bad for rural Nevadans. Vote NO on Question 3. bit.ly/2P0neHQ
3
5
9
Las Vegas Weekly called Question 3 a “formula for chaos.” Please vote NO on 3. bit.ly/2EFJl2u
19
32
6
69
Question 3 would create major roadblocks to fixing the problems caused by electricity deregulation. bit.ly/2RPB0vz
1
1
4
Former Nevada Attorney General Frankie Sue DelPapa opposes Question 3 because it would lock electricity deregulation into Nevada’s Constitution. Get the facts: bit.ly/2PhQZ7g
5
6
15