Really feeling the need for a vacation. It's so important to just get away and look at your phone somewhere new.

There should be a name for this phenomenon, when a female character provides important context for the male protagonist and his downfall, but she gets recontextualized as a "wet blanket" or spoilsport by fans who prefer superficiality. I propose "Skyler Whitewashing."

First trailer for ‘WAY OF THE WARRIOR KID’, starring Chris Pratt and Jude Hill. The film follows a decorated Navy SEAL who trains his nephew to stand up to his bullies. Releasing November 20 on Apple TV.

‘YOU CAN SEE EVERYTHING’ earned $19.5M in its second weekend, a 25% increase from its opening weekend. It is tracking to become one of the highest grossing non-music documentaries of the century.

The best Bond movie was made in 2006, so I'm not sure he has to be 20th century. The franchise has always used Bond to reflect the current idea of masculinity--Sean Connery's dapper man in a suit, Daniel Craig's more rugged ruthlessness. So what does 2020s masculinity look like?

Sebastian Stan admits he's jealous of Robert Downey Jr. ahead of 'AVENGERS: DOOMSDAY': "He's not only loved in the MCU but his character is going to last forever, from Iron Man to Dr. Doom and back to Iron Man, he's the face of the MCU."

Not true @conservmillen. You become courageous by experiencing fear and overcoming it. You become more fearful by avoiding scary things. This is exactly why @JonHaidt calls out "safetyism" for contributing to the mental health crisis. Horror films therefore can make you become courageous by giving you a safe place to experience scary things and make them lose their power over you. Obviously not all Horror films are the same. "Friday the 13th" and "Saw" make evil seem cool. "Halloween" and "The Exorcist" make overcoming evil seem cool. But rejecting horror films because they make you fearful is the wrong solution to the wrong problem.

‘YOU CAN SEE EVERYTHING’ will be submitted for Oscar consideration in the following categories: • Best Picture • Best Director • Best Supporting Actress • Best Documentary Feature • Best Production Design • Best Cinematography • Best Costume Design • Best Film Editing • Best Makeup and Hairstyling • Best Sound • Best Original Score

i seem to be the only person who saw "you can see everything" and didn't like it. a few reasons why: - the tone felt wrong. the audience was laughing for much of the film, but i don't find the subject matter particularly funny. made it feel like the film was making light of a serious situation, intentionally or not. - i couldn't tell what was real. how much of this was scripted, rehearsed, or manipulated in the editing room? everyone spoke a little too perfectly for it to be entirely unscripted. the ambiguity made it difficult for me to trust what i was watching. - nathan felt like an unreliable narrator. his relationship with elizabeth blurred the line between observer and participant, making me question his motives and the film's perspective. - so many layers of performance...i understand that blurring reality and performance is part of the point, but at some stage, the cleverness started getting in the way of the story. it's one of the most confusing documentaries i've watched from an audience perspective. - i'm simply tired of elizabeth holmes having a platform. i'll also be the first to admit that i fell asleep during the middle of it and knew absolutely nothing about nathan fielder going in. both definitely influenced my experience & i will watch it again to see what i missed the first time. was it interesting and provacative? yes, of course. i'm not arguing with that. but i seem to have missed the genius everyone else saw, but i left feeling like the film was more interested in being clever than in saying something meaningful.

Elizabeth Holmes' partner Billy Evans admits "she looks insane" in the "You Can See Everything" trailer and says "I might think this is the dumbest thing I have ever done" when he finally sees the movie. "There's been a lot of media produced on her. There's been a lot of people who have told her story. That narrative is pretty ossified. The whole idea was here she is, see her and make up your own mind. It's not to re-litigate the case. It was to have people see who she is. I have gone through this consistent experience with the people who love me most, from my grandmother to my best friends. They'd hear I knew [Elizabeth Holmes] or I was falling for this person and now we're going to have a kid... in the beginning, every single one of these people thought I was crazy. 'Do you know who she is?' I would tell them, 'I understand why you feel that way but just meet her.' And they would meet her and spend time with her and see her in a totally natural environment, like going on a hike or helping a friend. Every opinion of her would radically shift. That was the intention of the film. To help scale that up and allow other people to sit with her and make up their own minds." "Am I nervous [for the movie to be seen]? I have been through so many intense, surreal experiences that it takes a bit to raise my blood pressure. With this there's certainly concern but it's ultimately our decision." (via All-In Podcast) variety.com/2026/film/news/b…