On a journey to discover if journalists and ideologues can indeed be hated enough. Initial assessments indicate no.

Joined January 2017
If the death penalty can't be a thing, can we at least flog these rats to within an inch of their life (publicly) and send them back to their shitholes on a leaky raft?
🚩It’s happened again -Karanpreet Singh rapes accident victim in Hamilton. “A woman left with permanent, life-altering injuries after a car crash was raped by a care worker on the first day he was left to work unsupervised. The victim said the attack left her depressed, anxious and scared. Her rapist, Karanpreet Singh, who had moved to NZ from India recently, will now be deported after serving a prison sentence. Singh, in his early 20s, had defended several charges at a judge-alone trial and was found guilty of rape and attempted sexual violation in the Hamilton District Court He tried to kiss her, but the victim was not responding. Then he raped her. Afterwards, he asked her not to tell his colleagues. Singh left, and the victim showered, but before she was able to get help, he returned. He then attempted to sexually violate her again before she broke free of his grip Judge Crayton and Crown prosecutor Kasey Dillon discussed Singh’s eligibility for a credit for being a foreign prisoner on the basis that imprisonment would be unduly harsh. Dillon said the Court of Appeal had made it clear the discount could be given to prisoners who do not speak English and would be totally isolated in prison.” India has one of the highest incidences of rape in the world - and Luxon, Seymour and Labour want more - including caregivers being added to visas. The destruction of NZ’s high trust society by an imported rotten culture. nzherald.co.nz/nz/karanpreet…
1
20
- Lawrence (Originally Xi) *born in china * 2 Chinese parents (eastern) * moved (from the east) after early formative years - Ani (unchanged name) * born in the west, raised in the west, to western parents * Kiwi parent "We're both kiwis" Holy false equivalence Batman!
Lawrence Xu-Nan and I moved to NZ in the same year. 1994. I turned 4 that year & he would’ve been a few years older. I from the UK. He from China. We are both New Zealanders.
2
32
Our high trust societies are collapsing. We don't have to live like this. We don't have to live with scammers and predators.
3
76
It's actually worse than we thought.
“wHy aRe tHerE iNdiaNs In pOrTuGaL?!” Because they are good slaves, you are not. I hate essay-posting but allow me a rare indulgence: To understand what is happening now, you need understand that this isn’t the first time it’s happened. Why are there Indians in Kenya? Suriname? Fiji? Burma? Because Indians have always been the preferred servile class of elites. The evidence for this goes back hundreds of years. I’ve spoken about British colonial Burma before, and it is a great example of what this looks like. Even after extensive efforts to bring them to heel, the majority of the Burmese ethnic groups were far too resistant to submit to the British empire to be reliable labor. They refused to abandon their culture and ways of life to be slave drones for British pocketbooks. So the Brits started importing Indians to be their colonial administrators, preferring them as labor because they were easier to control and satisfy. By the 1940s, Indians made up almost 20% of the population of the entire country. Another great historical example of this is Suriname - a small country in South America that had been under Dutch colonial rule for 300 years. The Dutch abolished slavery in 1863, forcing colonial plantation owners to have to hire labor to do the work they had previously been using slaves for. But… they didn’t want to pay former slaves or Indigenous locals a living wage for the work. So what did the Dutch elites do instead? Import Indians. Today, Indians still make up 27% of the population. 27%. Of a tiny, obscure South American country. We could basically go through the list of every country with a non-negligible Indian population and the theme would be consistent: They were brought there by elites who needed a submissive, easily exploitable labor pool when local labor asked for better living conditions or wages. Why? Because Indians never did. They are a population that seems fully content with subjugation (even Marx noticed this). So it’s easy to see why they were such an ideal population for the intensive global expansion era of colonial empires. And it’s even easier to see why they are perfect subjects for late capitalism now. They are the culturally, psychologically, and physically ideal organism for the dominant system. There’s 1.4 billion of them. They are deeply socially stratified and so expect and even enjoy inequality. Their cuisine is cheap, meat-free slop. They live amongst trash and filth with no qualms. They don’t care about the environment. Their reaction to death and abuse is blank-eyed indifference. They are physically and spiritually malleable. They not only adopt and internalize the demands of the dominant system as personal ambition, they believe this servitude makes them better than everyone else who hasn’t. Absolutely IDEAL subjects. You, on the other hand, are not the ideal subject. You want to live in a high-trust society. You would shed tears if someone tried to cut down the apple tree you climbed as a child to build a data center. You want to see and experience beauty. You want your own space. You have an expectation that your living conditions will improve over time. You would not be content to live in a room with 10 other people, work 16 hours per day for pennies, and eat cheap slop. You are a liability. Just like the Burmese and Surinamese slaves were. And as we continue to crawl deeper into this late capitalist hellscape, you and your silly little needs will come into increasing conflict with those of the system. Thus, you WILL be replaced by people far easier to control and far less concerned about their own welfare or the welfare of everyone and everything around them. … Unless you do something about it. But the system has already locked-in that you won’t, and that you’ll just sort of fade into nothingness, distracted by meaningless comforts and terrified of the uncertainty of change. So “why are Indians in [wherever]?” Because you are about to not be.
153
What the FTA means is that every single person in NZ now has to compete with another billion people for the produce and products from our nation. Anyone who understands basic free-market economics knows that more consumer competition means higher prices. Kiwis are getting SCREWED
The truth about the India-NZ Free Trade Agreement This could force voters to abandon Labour and National at the next election. 1News didn't provide any valid counter-argument of why the India-NZ Free Trade Agreement isn't good for New Zealand. Both National and Labour are pushing it through without NZ First's support, but it could be the demise of both parties. Here's some things 1News didn't say about the deal that are detrimental to Kiwis: 1. Unbalanced dairy access: NZ fully opens its market, but major dairy products like milk, cheese and butter remain excluded or face high Indian tariffs. 2. Excessive immigration concessions: Grants significant work and student visas to Indians without caps, potentially impacting NZ jobs, services and significantly increasing the cost of housing for all Kiwis. 3. Unfair market deal: NZ offers broad tariff-free access to Indian goods while gaining limited reciprocal benefits. 4. Investment commitments: Requires NZ to invest billions in India, with risks of clawback if targets unmet. 5. Poor deal for farmers: Creates more competition for our farmers and could put them "out of business", like the influx of Chinese canned foods, that made it impossible for our local growers and manufacturers to compete, and is the real reason they closed down. This is not a good deal for Kiwis, farmers and local manufacturers. It benefits exporters, but the rest of us "pay the price". Who has enough influence to force National and Labour to push this through so fast without due diligence? Date: 2026-04-23 Source: 1News Reporter: Maiki Sherman Copyright Authority: Fair Dealing
1
1
167
Epic ratio
Replying to @Tru_Powell
Then go be black in the Congo. White countries do not need you. You think you're fucking tired?
86
The idea that we're "all the same, just different" is utter nonsense. The left would welcome hordes of these donkey fuckers into the beautiful, high trust societies the west has built. And they'd call you a racist for gatekeeping our oasis from these degenerates.
This quoted post is unavailable.
1
74
Far-right Native retweeted
he walked so nick fuentes could run
6
43
1
3,413
134,635
Must be one of those "isolated incident" situations....
51
There's a sweet spot of dislike that a minority viewpoint can occupy where it seems to give credibility to that person/opinion. Then there's the likes of James Lindsay and Sam Harris, whose opinions are so universally disliked that it's plain as day how obscenely wrong they are.
You're not really that interesting. Just a cog in a wheel. I've pointed at that fact, what? twice? three times? Don't flatter yourself.
1
64
These beliefs don't stop at the border. There is no magic soil that fills a person with all of a nation's ideals. And yet, we let them in despite all of the obvious signs that we shouldn't.
Read this a few times
85
God's work comes in all different shapes and sizes. It needs doing, no matter what.
im building things no ever has before >node count up to ~1.4m >added all popeyes locations available as a filter >added a violent crime heat map filter >added state pages, check most unique names & loudest zip codes in your state builders build peaceandquiet.io
1
93
The absolute state of that effeminate fist.
I thought this was AI, but it isn't. What a bunch of fruitloops
1
1
70
Happy Australia day, cunts. Crack a beer and stop being a sad sack. That is all
65
Watching the crowd who advocated lockdowns, vaccination ransoms, and #NoKings protesters, who also don't believe in borders, cry about the 'sovereignty' of a nation that is under the tyrannical rule of a man who refused to step down after losing the last election is ironic 🤦‍♂️
1
1
147
"Courts look at - context - meaning to a reasonable person" This genius gave the rebuttal to his argument in the images supplied. Epic levels of debate right there. These people are veritable morons.
unavailable
2
1
1
276
They know what they've been doing all this time. Deport the immigrants. Save our nation. #nzpol
102
Who could've guessed that importing people from a nation of scammers, grifters, and con-artists meant we were gonna wind up with scammers, grifters, and con-artists in our communities? This happened in one of our most vulnerable communities, no less. When will they learn?
FFS!!! Import the third world become the third world. If you’re not born in NZ then you shouldn’t be allowed in parliament or council. Fake licenses now voter fraud. Send these arseholes back to India. Always scamming..
63
*Has literal proof that immigrants don't assimilate, they just bring their shit here* "Take that, xenophobes" Multiculturalism is a scam.
Seems that Naveed Akram was born in Australia. Like our homegrown Brenton Tarrant. So the xenophobes can probably pipe down about now.
3
19
547
When they say rule, they genuinely mean it. These people think you are their servant. From the same kind of people that protest about "No Kings"
Make sure to watch @JacindaArdern’s new documentary 'Prime Minister' - out in cinemas today! 🎬 #TheGNShow
49