Deep insight and dank memes for misfits at the raw edge of consciousness & spirituality—straight to your inbox.

now
Joined November 2022
In 1989, a small tech company sued a government-backed consortium for allegedly stealing their research. Standard Silicon Valley IP dispute. One problem: the founders were also running an illegal MDMA lab in Mexico producing 20kg a month. This is a true story 🧵
2
8
1
393
1,129,389
I’m trusting that the pain of letting go will be eclipsed by the relief of moving on.
62
the past wasn’t as good as you remember, the present isn’t as bad as you think, and the future will be better than you anticipate.
71
Not So Profound (beta) retweeted
Replying to @hilbertspaess
Life is not a problem to be solved, but a reality to be experienced. ―Soren Kierkegaard
1
1
38
True success is exiting some rat race to modulate one’s activities for peace of mind.
1
89
Not So Profound (beta) retweeted
Replying to @SMilk945 @NTFabiano
A Master from the Himalayas once said that the reason for depression is lack of true expression. Therefore, your true expression, of your true self, has been depressed by believing in the false image of yourself. Once you know who you truly are - you are no longer depressed - but are awakened to the true expression of who you are.
1
2
34
It’s surreal to watch Big Pharma pour billions into psychedelics after decades of the War on Drugs pushed them to the fringes. I’m not against companies like @EliLillyandCo getting involved, but I hope this doesn’t become another story of patents and profit being prioritized over accessibility and the people these treatments are supposed to help.
1
140
Not So Profound (beta) retweeted
$ATAI deal with Lily is pretty interesting, here's my opinion on the implications: First off, clearly bearish for Compass because, "Why didn't Lily buy $CMPS?". They would have evaluated the two and the transaction may be interpreted as favoring ATAI's platform, although Lilly's reasoning has not been publicly disclosed. Some investors may view this as a negative signal. Directionally negative/bearish doesn't mean absolutely bearish though. The likely reasons for Lily to pick ATAI instead: 1) They want to bet on the shorter acting drug 2) ATAI is probably cheaper to acquire than CMPS 3) They like the strategic profile ATAI's offerings over CMPS. (1) Makes sense as people worry about the 6-8 hour treatment regime for CMPS. I personally believe those worries are overblown. Plus, DFTX has a similar treatment regime and the market doesn’t seem too worried about that when trading it at a $6B valuation. (2) CMPS probably can't be acquired for less than $4-$5B. Not at this stage of the game. ATAI is going for $2.8B plus $1B CVR. So yes, it's cheaper, but this argument is pretty weak because Lily has a >1 Trillion dollar market cap so the price differences to them are largely rounding errors. (3) ATAI has a different drug mechanism and a few different avenues to commercialize. But ATAI is 2.5+ years behind Compass on approval (and meaningful risk of failure with the additional steps). --- On the bullish side, I think this increases the pressure on an acquiror, specifically JNJ to consider acting. They presumably want to defend their current Spravato brand/drug/market share. If Lily is taking ATAI, and if someone else takes Compass, it becomes a very challenging and competitive space in 2030 and beyond. A plausible defense here is that a potential acquisition of CMPS by JNJ is one of several possible outcomes and has ~3 years to really solidify their leadership in the market before Lily shows up. Plus it lets JNJ further monetize the REMS-clinic infrastructure that they spent so long building out for Spravato, instead of letting CMPS (or some CMPS acquiror) take advantage of it. Overall this development doesn't meaningfully change my thesis in either direction. My full writeup here: xitter.cf/kevin__mak/status/2075… Disclosure: Long $CMPS, no position in $ATAI Creek Drive and its affiliated funds may hold positions in securities discussed. Views expressed are current opinions for informational educational only, subject to change and are not investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Investing involves the risk of loss and past performance is not indicative of future performance. See the disclosures link above for more important information.
23
11
108
27,251
Not So Profound (beta) retweeted
Slythering thru the inter-dimensions like...
1
2
99
Not So Profound (beta) retweeted
Replying to @FatherMcKennaa
1
1
6
305
Not So Profound (beta) retweeted
My favorite award show
1
1
95
Not So Profound (beta) retweeted
Seeing that old post about Christian saying $ATAI could be a $20B company pop up again is interesting timing. He’s been very consistent in interviews about short-duration compounds being the future and atai positioning itself as the clear leader. That kind of messaging can shape how people allocate capital — and in some cases it likely caused investors to miss gains elsewhere while concentrating on atai. The Lilly acquisition of AtaiBeckley at ~$2.8B upfront (plus CVRs) is a solid outcome for anyone who got in early, and it’s meaningful validation that Big Pharma is now stepping into psychedelics. Still, it lands well below the long-term vision that was being discussed. As an investor, you have to separate the narrative from eventual reality. It’s easy to get caught up when one story is told loudly. The lesson is to keep some healthy skepticism, no matter how compelling the case sounds. Anyways, moving forward. Staying focused on $DFTX, $CMPS, and $HELP.
In an interview published 2 months ago with @C_Angermayer. He stated that he felt at IPO that the business could be a $20b+ company, and crucially still feels that way. ( $ATAI currently at around $500m in market cap). Sounds ambitious for sure... but... 1. The Mental Health market is set to be worth $573b by 2033, and given the mental health crisis globally that's probably quite conservative (Ok, very!). 2. Anti-Depressants/SSRI's, they're being handed out like confetti but they don't work. And there's a ton of different versions, variations, and hybrids with long and mostly stupid brand names. 3. If they do work, they have some rubbish side effects (Personal experience, they're not fun). So TLDR; - One of the worlds biggest challenges that will only get worse. - A market that has had the same 'solution' for 20 years. - A contrarian solution that @peterthiel has invested in.
2
1
26
3,008
If waters are placid, the moon will be mirrored perfectly. If you still yourself, you can mirror the divine perfectly.
2
400
We are like butterflies who flutter for a day and think it is forever 🦋
1
378
Not So Profound (beta) retweeted
Often, the easiest part is the actual psychedelic experience. The most difficult, and most important part comes AFTER during integration. The lessons you learn are useless unless you integrate them into your life and actually embody them 😉
1
1
5
497
Not So Profound (beta) retweeted
Joe Rogan texted Trump about psychedelics. Trump replied: "Sounds great. Do you want FDA approval? Let's do it." 56 years of psychedelic prohibition started to unravel with a text message. Here's what actually happened 🧵
3
2
1
9
1,058
You are not you in the way that you think you are YOU.
1
335
A true psychonaut doesn’t reduce complex substances or medicines to simplistic claims that one is universally “better” than another. Each has distinct effects, risks, contexts, and potential uses and deserves to be approached with knowledge, caution, and respect.
2
6
621
5-MeO-DMT has come a long way 🐸
85
381
34
5,774
799,005
Here's a thread I wrote about 5-MeO-DMT a while back if you're curious: xitter.cf/NotSoProf0und/status/1…
5-MeO-DMT has steadily gained popularity over the years. People are now keeping these toads as pets to harvest their venom. Is it a moral, ethical, and loving act to keep the creator of the "God molecule" hostage for your own selfish reasons? THREAD 👇🏽 [1/12] 🧵
2
9
29,121