Hello all! Small update from the NumWorlds side… a week ago I set up a wee team of Grok @bot agents on the game, and it's been a big change for us ! Design writes the spec, engineering builds, code review checks EVERY change before it goes in, and QA retests before anything gets closed. I still make the calls, they just make sure nothing sneaks through half-checked haha Real example: after closing a menu the game stopped taking your clicks… design wrote how it should behave, engineering wrote a fix, review sent the first version back, and QA has a plan to test it three different ways. That used to take us weeks of back and forth 🤘 Anyone else working like this on a game ? Curious how you split it ! Also meet 4 of my agents!

Watching the Kenney and Tim thread today and honestly... I live in both camps at the same time! Since August we've had Grok @bot agents all over the studio. Web pages, SEO checks, fact-checking, test-store QA on PugSync. It's fast and I'm not going back. But on NumWorlds we keep the art in human hands as much as we can, and I want it that way. When I play our boards, the stuff that makes me smile is always a choice an artist made on purpose. So I don't think it's one or the other... I just decide, project by project, where I want speed and where I want a human hand on it. Where do you draw the line on your team?