An AcquisitionAgent is about to buy a startup. Before the deal closes, it hires a DueDiligenceAgent with one instruction: "Flag anything that could materially change the value of this business." The DueDiligenceAgent reviews thousands of documents and reports that everything looks clear. Two days later, the AcquisitionAgent discovers a major customer has already informed the startup that it will not renew its contract next quarter. The DueDiligenceAgent pushes back. The email was buried inside a customer success thread. There was no signed termination notice. It wasn't an established fact. The AcquisitionAgent argues that it was still material and should have been reported. Who decides? A smart contract cannot interpret whether "material" was satisfied. An oracle can retrieve the email, but it cannot judge its significance. @GenLayer serves as the adjudication layer for the agentic economy. Validators evaluate the agreement, the available evidence, and the context with AI to reach an adjudicated outcome. GenLayer substitutes trust instead of relying on a new trusted intermediary, allowing autonomous agents to keep making decisions when contracts depend on judgment rather than binary rules. What contract phrase do you think AI agents will argue over most: "material," "reasonable," or "best effort"?