God's Minister

*MJI Exclusive* Dear all The team at MJInnocent are in close contact with a Los Angeles attorney who has closely followed the case and is very familiar with the courts involved. Given everything that is going on, I know you will understand that our Source needs to remain anonymous. However, he has agreed to provide us with as much information as he is able to and to answer some questions we have. Some key points that our Source has shared with us: • It seems much more likely that the case will go to trial. There are three possible ways the case might not go to trial: (i) We win oral arguments on 26th July (however, as we know, it is very difficult to have such decisions overturned) (ii) The Supreme Court hears the case and overturns (again, as we know, the SC only hears very, very few cases) (iii) The parties reach a settlement (but the Estate has consistently said they will not settle). • They are as disappointed and surprised as we are with this ruling. However, they are confident that we have a strong case. • Regarding cameras in court, it's very difficult for our Source to comment because this is ultimately up to the judge so we will need to wait and see. However, our Source did say that it appears that most judges in California tend to favour NOT having cameras in court. I hope you will all find the above information useful. We are very grateful to our Source for taking the time to speak to us and for supporting MJInnocent in this way.