The latest & most accurate legal news on Drake’s case against Universal Music Group (UMG) ⚖️ Not affiliated with Drake/OVO/UMG ✉️ [email protected]
United States
Joined January 2025
- Tweets2.9K
- Following0
- Followers12.1K
- Likes18.6K
It’s funny how your yellow journalism couldn’t keep you employed at Rolling Stone. You were nothing but a disgruntled and hateful stan passing off a journalist. In the end, it didn’t benefit you at all and you’re still struggling to recover, 8 months later. What’s The Dirt did what you bozos in media fail to do which is research and ask questions.
Apparently online casinos are only a “questionable endeavor” when people you don’t like have dealings with them? But when a collaborator of an organization you sit on the board for has involvement in online casinos that’s perfectly okay? Do we have that right Ebro?
You can repost and spin the headline as much as you want, Billboard, but the facts remain the same. The lawsuit was terminated and the parties were sent to arbitration because it should never have been a lawsuit in the first place. Plaintiffs had no legal right to sue.
It’s also interesting that nothing in your article or the plaintiffs’ attorneys’ statement mentions that 7 of 8 plaintiffs never even had Stake accounts or used Stake services. They falsely alleged that they suffered damage from a service they never used. And when the plaintiffs were asked by Stake to provide proof that they had Stake accounts, neither they nor their attorneys responded. Try these tricks on the illiterate, because we can read.
With this being the fourth consecutive frivolous lawsuit to be tossed, we hope the pattern is obvious. These cases waste the courts’ time and are total nonsense. They’re being filed not to seek justice but to generate bad press for Drake, as you can see from the numerous media outlets that reported the filing in January 2026. It’s the most blatant display of a smear campaign.
📣 Update: A December 2025 Virginia class-action lawsuit accusing Stake of operating an “illegal online casino” whose funds were used to inflate Drake’s music streams and disparage his competitors has been terminated by a federal judge.
The judge ruled that one of the eight plaintiffs signed an enforceable arbitration agreement with Stake on August 15, 2025, that waives the right to sue and requires disputes to be resolved through arbitration. The remaining seven plaintiffs did not have Stake accounts, never used Stake’s services, and had no right to sue. No discovery occurred, and none of the allegations in the complaint were proven true.
This is a legal win for defendants Stake, Kick Streaming, Drake, Adin Ross, and George Nguyen.
📣 Update: A December 2025 Virginia class-action lawsuit accusing Stake of operating an “illegal online casino” whose funds were used to inflate Drake’s music streams and disparage his competitors has been terminated by a federal judge.
The judge ruled that one of the eight plaintiffs signed an enforceable arbitration agreement with Stake on August 15, 2025, that waives the right to sue and requires disputes to be resolved through arbitration. The remaining seven plaintiffs did not have Stake accounts, never used Stake’s services, and had no right to sue. No discovery occurred, and none of the allegations in the complaint were proven true.
This is a legal win for defendants Stake, Kick Streaming, Drake, Adin Ross, and George Nguyen.