The Other Half is a new centre of research for practical, workable policy in the interests of women.

Westminster, UK
Joined November 2022
The Other Half retweeted
Care homes have long ran a business model based on an ability to pay unskilled wages for skilled (and exhausting) work. They can do so because of the implicit offer of a visa Mahmood is right to call time on this. If jobs are not domestically attractive, employers must do better
Exclusive: Shabana Mahmood is fighting a rearguard action to save her migration reforms in the face of mounting public criticism from cabinet colleagues The home secretary is under pressure to water down her plans to make it harder for foreign workers to claim permanent residence Andy Burnham, the prime minister, is considering exempting care workers from plans to extend the qualifying period for claiming indefinite leave to remain (ILR) from five years to 15 years However, the Home Office has argued that the move could backfire because it could lead to an exodus of foreign care workers from their jobs once they gained permanent residence and were no longer bound by the terms of their visas A senior ally of Mahmood said she retained Burnham’s broad support over the plans: “Andy has been on Shabana’s side throughout this row over ILR. He is holding the line.” thetimes.com/article/1a6e1a3…
67
121
15
988
92,003
Getting lots of media requests on this. May be helpful to note: - It's already banned (yes online too), this is the 4th ban - You should ask the government how it will be enforced. How will this actually... work.
This is now the 4th ban on strangulation p🤢rn here - will be interested to see if the government actually enforce it, or are just hoping that tech companies notice it is illegal (they could be forgiven, as the current laws, won after the murder of Jane Longhurst in 2003, were never intended to be *used*).
2
8
2
22
4,296
This is now the 4th ban on strangulation p🤢rn here - will be interested to see if the government actually enforce it, or are just hoping that tech companies notice it is illegal (they could be forgiven, as the current laws, won after the murder of Jane Longhurst in 2003, were never intended to be *used*).
How did we get to this? Giving schoolkids lessons on sexual strangulation danger seems like a last resort: but it’s really the first resort in a several decade long battle with the harms of ultraviolent porn. It’ll be clear we’ve done nothing for too long 👇
2
3
3
6
5,887
The Other Half retweeted
It is a good idea to remove cliff edges like this that create perverse incentives for aspirational people. BUT This does not change the fact that our current childcare policy is anti-choice, economically illiterate and bad for children. A system that offers help to parents only if they hand over their nine-month-old to the State is not conservative. The reason most mothers return to work as soon as possible is not because they’re desperate to put their babies in institutional childcare; it’s because the cost of living is so high that most families now need two incomes to survive. The majority of mothers of small children, when surveyed, say they would prefer to work less when their children are small. A conservative policy would pay a childcare allowance/tax break that parents could use as they see fit - to work fewer hours, use informal childcare or pay for formal childcare. Conservatives should also recognise that the primary value of a mother is not found in her ability generate a short-term GDP boost for the Treasury bean counters. Our current childcare policy is also a wonderful example of the idiocy of socialist economics. The state pays a fixed price for a good (in this case, hours of childcare) that is less than the cost of production and then wonders why there is a shortage of the good. 🤔 Childcare places also cost more than the average mother who returns to work pays in tax. If encouraging mothers back into the workplace is the aim, this is a ludicrously expensive way of doing it. Yet conservatives seem deeply confused about the aim of ‘childcare’. Is it to get parents back to work or is it about early childhood education? Whatever it is, the current arrangement is harming our children. Long hours in institutional childcare before age two are linked to emotional and behavioural problems later in life. This is not rocket science - babies need a strong and consistent attachment to their mother in order to be able to learn to regulate their emotions and be psychologically secure. State-funded childcare is therefore a false economy if it makes children less productive later in life. By all means, remove cliff edges. But if the Conservatives are the party of the family, then they should overhaul childcare policy to put the family first. The current system views individuals purely as economic units - and that is socialism, not conservatism.
Kemi Badenoch has pledged to restore free childcare to high earners if she wins the next election. The Conservative Party leader said the rules left parents thousands of pounds worse off when their earnings exceed £100,000, meaning that working harder does not always pay. Under the “absurd” cliff edge rules, when one parent’s earnings increase by only £1 to over £100,000, a working couple could lose their entire entitlement of up to 30 hours a week of childcare support ⤵️ telegraph.co.uk/politics/202…
23
25
10
112
12,845
The Other Half retweeted
One of the weirdest discoveries in the Assisted Dying debate was finding out that ‘lethal’ injections are not always lethal - and certainly aren’t the peaceful way out some assume.
16
48
1
222
9,060
It's notable also that Scandinavian countries* use parental benefits to get women to work more like men. (The purpose of the thing is what it does). Sweden, for instance, used to give families an allowance to stay at home with infants. This was whipped away when mums used it.
Scandinavia has family benefits that would blow your mind. Yet the fertility in Nordic countries is lower than in the United States, which offers far less. Social spending alone can't fix birthrates when cultural forces push in the opposite direction. 1/5
1
3
1
3
639
How do we know what mums really want from the earlier years? We asked them! Family friendly work, more parenting time (not less) with young children, an economy that allows for care, and a village of support. theotherhalf.uk/what-do-mums…
1
1
63
So will any of the mainstream UK parties give real choice to mums? Promising signs in the debate on the Babies Bill - a great use of a Private Members Bill.
So refreshing to hear an MP talk about what mums actually want from policy! More choice, MORE time with young children. @SWDevonRebecca in today's PMB debate on @DesmondSwayne's Infants, Parents and Carers Bill. This Bill will be the world first to recognise the importance of the first 1001 days.
1
2
81
The Other Half retweeted
'Alicia felt that medical practitioners did everything in their power to see the process through to a foregone conclusion, acting with the technical efficiency of factory workers on a production line.'
We spoke to Alicia early last year, as the UK assisted dying Bills were racing through parliament. Like those Bills, Canadian MAID meant there was no obligation to tell Alicia and her sister that her mum was going to be given lethal drugs. youtu.be/lgxS8V9cj74?is=A8xL…
1
76
So grateful that @aliciaduncan_xo is brave enough to share the horror that she and her sister went through - in trying to save her beautiful mum.
My mum wasn't terminally ill - she needed help... We had 48 hours to stop Canada's assisted-dying system but failed and days later she was given a lethal injection trib.al/cmRZSTd
1
9
1
24
877
We spoke to Alicia early last year, as the UK assisted dying Bills were racing through parliament. Like those Bills, Canadian MAID meant there was no obligation to tell Alicia and her sister that her mum was going to be given lethal drugs. youtu.be/lgxS8V9cj74?is=A8xL…
3
1
5
248
The Other Half retweeted
My mum wasn't terminally ill - she needed help... We had 48 hours to stop Canada's assisted-dying system but failed and days later she was given a lethal injection trib.al/cmRZSTd
38
318
44
780
93,913
Campaign group Dignity in Dying have a grim past. From eugenics, to freeing the mercy killing men, to a private death service (delivered by their janitor, a self described 'devil' who would not take 'no' for an answer) - the latter only uncovered by chance via a coroner's inquest. (The AD Bill would have removed coroners from assisted deaths)
One thing we should never forget after today: Dignity in Dying are simply the Voluntary Euthanasia Society rebranded. Nobody should be in any doubt what the real end point is here. A civilised society which cares for the weak and vulnerable must resist this agenda.
7
46
4
78
2,910
‘I can assure you it’s absolutely nothing to do with us’ The Voluntary Euthanasia Society respond to the wrongful death of a man otherhalforg.substack.com/p/…
1
4
179
Eugenics
Was there anything before gender-woo that all the dinner-party circuit pretended to be believe, and then pretended they never did believe?
1
3
11
387
Grateful that the Commons reconsidered - and MPs said NO to this Bill yesterday.
NEW, on the unacceptable risk that a coerced woman is given death by the state. What happens if we leave the clear line that killing women is wrong? Results here & abroad may give MPs pause. We say assisted dying safeguards must never fail, lest the state delivers femicide. 🧵
1
2
15
478
MPs had to think about the women who don't want any fuss:
She "says in a quivering voice that she does not want to be a burden or cause any fuss and does not want her family to have an awful time at the point of her death" Karen Bradley MP on the woman MPs had a duty to think about - in deciding whether assisted death Bill was fit to become law.
1
6
302
The Other Half retweeted
"Having worked for many years in a domestic abuse charity, I know that coercion is not a risk with this legislation – it is a certainty.There is nothing progressive about giving perpetrators of domestic abuse a new way to kill their victims." Brilliant from Jess Asato MP
2
119
1
514
6,258