One of our custom T-Shirts we made for a client
If you are interested l go and check out the store outbacksuncatchers.com/
47
Decided to do some cups tonight and put them up in the shop
All available for purchase.
If you are interested in a personal cup like this Grumpy Granny one but your own style shoot us a dm
outbacksuncatchers.com/produ…
49
We’ve added more children’s Christmas T-shirts, plus a selection of "Choose Your Own Quote” mugs!
With 10 different funny quotes to choose from, you’re sure to find the perfect gift for that special someone! 🎁☕
Go and check out the shop
outbacksuncatchers.com/
37
New items have been added to the shop, Trucker Hats, Wide Brim Fishing hats and double decal T-Shirts.
All going at a great Price
outbacksuncatchers.com/
43
Been a bit quiet
My wife got a shop open
Setting it up
Have quite a bit of stock
Check it out and see if you lile anything
outbacksuncatchers.com/
49
Brad retweeted
"No more free rides."
Europe has spent €800 billion on defence since 2014.
It buys $68 billion a year in American weapons.
64% of all its major arms purchases are American.
The US doesn't help protect Europe for free.
It helps protects Europe while selling it weapons.
Europe is not the freeloader.
Europe is your biggest customer.
And now we're going to start to shop elsewhere.
Brad retweeted
🤣🤣🤣You missed out:
1. Week One: We destroyed the entire Iranian navy- all 17 boats
2. Next day. We destroyed the entire Iranian navy- all 37 boats
3. 2 days later. Proud of the US military!!- today we DECIMATED the ENTIRE IRANIAN NAVY- ALL 57 BOATS!!
🇺🇸🇮🇷 The Trump Timeline:
🔸️Jan 18: “Iranian patriots, help is coming. We are moving in.”
🔸️Feb 28: “We are launching the decisive operation. It will be very fast.”
🔸️Mar 2: “We will win easily.”
🔸️Mar 3: “We have won the war.”
🔸️Mar 7: “We defeated Iran.”
🔸️Mar 9: “Strike Iran. The war is almost over—clean and decisive.”
🔸️Mar 12: “We have won, but not completely yet.”
🔸️Mar 13: “We won the war again.”
🔸️Mar 14: “We need help to open the strait.”
🔸️Mar 15: “If you don’t help, I will remember it.”
🔸️Mar 16: “We actually don’t need help—I was testing loyalty. If NATO doesn’t help, consequences will follow."
🔸️Mar 17: “We don’t need NATO help and don’t want it. No Congress approval needed to exit NATO.”
🔸️Mar 18: “Allies must cooperate to open the Strait of Hormuz.”
🔸️Mar 19: “US allies must step up and help open the strait.”
🔸️Mar 20: “NATO is cowardly. We may phase this out.”
🔸️Mar 21: “We don’t use the strait. Others need it, not us.”
🔸️Mar 22: “Final warning. Iran has 48 hours. Iran is finished.”
🔸️Mar 23: “One more week, then we bomb power plants.”
🔸️Mar 24: “The war is nearing its end.”
🔸️Mar 25: “We are negotiating with Iran.”
🔸️Mar 26: “Iran is begging for peace. They gave us a gift. We delay strikes on power plants.”
🔸️Mar 27: “I and the Ayatollah will jointly manage the Strait of Hormuz.”
🔸️Mar 28: “Regime change has occurred in Iran.”
🔸️Mar 29: “Negotiations with Iran are going extremely well.”
🔸️Mar 30: “We are prepared to destroy Iran’s oil and energy infrastructure and occupy Kharg Island.”
🔸️Mar 31: “We are ready to end the war without opening the strait.”
🔸️Apr 1: “War ends in 3 days. We will bomb them for 2–3 weeks back into the Stone Age.”
🔸️Apr 2: “We destroyed three major bridges. Why haven’t they called us yet?”
🔸️Apr 4th "open the fuken strait you crazy bastards or ill bomb everything'
Why aint they listening?" We are havving talks with ourselves"
1
72
Brad retweeted
This Administration has made a lot of reckless decisions, but threatening to pull the United States out of NATO has to be near the top of the list.
After September 11th, NATO invoked Article 5 for the first and only time in its history. Our allies declared that an attack on America was an attack on all of them, and they sent their own soldiers to fight and die alongside ours. That is what this alliance means.
Now, because those same allies won’t join an unauthorized war with Iran that Congress never approved and most Americans don’t support, Trump is threatening to walk away from 80 years of collective security.
That’s not how alliances work. NATO is a defensive organization. It has kept the peace in Europe for generations and served as a bulwark against Russian aggression.
You don’t get to blow it up because your allies won’t follow you into an unauthorized war.
Thanks to legislation that Marco Rubio, now Trump’s own Secretary of State, led in the Senate, the President needs congressional approval to pull us out of NATO, and I for one, am a firm NO.
What the world, our allies, and our own service members sacrificed to build is not Donald Trump’s to destroy.
time.com/article/2026/04/01/…
Think we know whos getting the free ride its not the EU
100,000 American troops in Europe = a free ride for Europeans?
Let's check the facts.
🔹 American military bases are not free
Germany, Italy, Spain, and Romania pay for the infrastructure, land, utilities, and civilian personnel of US bases. Germany alone contributes over $1 billion annually to support the American military presence on its soil.
🔹 Europe is the largest customer of the American defense industry
F-35s, Patriot missiles, HIMARS, Apaches — all purchased by Europeans with real money. Every security alarm in Europe translates into contracts for Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, and Boeing.
🔹 American bases in Europe don't only protect Europe
Ramstein in Germany coordinates operations across Africa and the Middle East. Sigonella in Italy covers the Mediterranean and North Africa. Romania secures the eastern flank and the Black Sea. These are global American strategic assets — not neighborhood security for Europeans.
🔹 Command is American, not European
NATO is always led by an American Supreme Commander (SACEUR). Europe contributes troops, bases, and money — but America holds the controls. Those who control the structure are not the ones getting a free ride.
🔹 The nuclear umbrella is not altruism
American nuclear deterrence in Europe keeps the dollar as the world's reserve currency, keeps European markets open to US corporations, and legitimizes American hegemony against Russia and China.
But what would actually happen if America withdrew its troops from Europe?
🔹 For America — immediate strategic losses
Without bases in Europe, American response time to any crisis in Europe, Africa, or the Middle East grows from hours to days. Ramstein, Sigonella, and Incirlik cannot be replaced by aircraft carriers. Infrastructure built over decades disappears overnight.
🔹 The American defense industry loses its biggest customer
A Europe without the US umbrella will build its own defense industry — and fast. Airbus Military, KNDS, Leonardo, and Rheinmetall will take the contracts that Lockheed and Raytheon currently win. Billions of dollars shift from America to Europe.
🔹 The dollar weakens
Dollar hegemony is partly sustained by American global military credibility. A withdrawal from Europe signals to the world that America no longer guarantees the postwar order. Alternatives — the euro, the yuan — become more attractive as global reserve options.
🔹 Russia wins without firing a single shot
Not necessarily through immediate invasion — but through political influence, energy pressure, and the gradual destabilization of countries on the eastern frontier. The Baltic states, Poland, and Romania enter a security grey zone that no one can guarantee quickly.
🔹 China watches and draws conclusions about Taiwan
A precedent of withdrawal from Europe sends a direct signal to Beijing: American commitments are negotiable. The cost of deterrence in the Pacific rises exponentially.
Withdrawal is not isolationism. It is strategic abdication.
America would not be leaving Europe because it no longer has interests there.
It would be leaving while ignoring that those very interests are what make it a superpower.
The "free ride" narrative doesn't describe Europe.
It describes exactly what America has in Europe.
46
Brad retweeted
Every now and then Australians get a taste of what a labor government is really like,
They just decide that Australia needs a change, so they vote labor.
This is the result.
Complete and utter failure.
It’s just dumb.
Never again.
Vote one nation 🇦🇺
Brad retweeted
Australia used to have 8 refineries.
Now they have 2.
They import diesel and gasoline from South Korea and Singapore.
With oil blocked in the Middle East, South Korea and Singapore are limiting exports of diesel and gasoline.
Australia gets crushed
Brad retweeted
Australians are facing a fuel security crisis, a crisis Labor has failed to take leadership of. That’s why I’m calling on the government to halve the fuel excise tax which will put 26c per litre back in your pocket.
We need affordable petrol, and we need it now.
Brad retweeted
5 years ago, do you think I was right?
The Senate on 22 June 2021. Senator HANSON (Queensland—Leader of Pauline Hanson's One Nation) (13:07): I rise to speak on the Fuel Security Bill 2021. When I came into the Senate in 2016 I raised the importance of fuel security for all Australians.
This and previous governments have continually failed to meet the internationally mandated 90 days stockpile of fuel for the people of this nation. That means this government has put at risk the fuel security of our daily transport needs: our defence, our aviation industry, our mining and our commuter needs.
Without this internationally mandated 90-day stockpile of fuel, Australia risks coming to a grinding halt. My concerns were echoed by Senator Jim Molan when he entered the parliament in December 2017. What has happened over the last five years? Nothing.
If we go back to the year 2000, Australia had eight refineries that literally met the entire needs of our domestic refined fuel requirements. That is the same year Australia was manufacturing more than 320,000 new cars and over 23,000 commercial vehicles.
Fast forward two decades, and Australia's self-sufficiency in the fuel space is going the same way as manufacturing. It's almost dead. Shamefully, in the space of four months, Australian oil refineries in Altona, owned by ExxonMobil, and Kwinana, owned by BP, announced they were closing half of this nation's remaining oil refineries.
They suggested the facilities were no longer economically viable. How is that possible?
When I looked at the consolidated income statements of each of these oil companies operating in Australia, I saw that each of them is pulling in tens of billions of dollars of revenue each year from Australians.
They drill the oil and gas. They send the bulk of it overseas to Asian markets that have cheap labour. Then we're forced to buy it back from foreign markets, where the oil companies have extracted the bulk of the jobs and profits that should belong to Australians.
Successive governments have squandered the opportunity to negotiate better deals for Australians off the back of these highly sought-after resources.
And here we are today expected to pass legislation that will pay these same multinational oil companies $2.3 billion of taxpayers' money to continue refining activities until 2027 and, if we're lucky, until 2030.
Well, I've got some bad news for this government: I'm not going to help pass a bill that takes us down the same path as the car industry, which received billions and billions of taxpayers' money only to close. I make no apologies for looking out for the best interests of Australian taxpayers.
If we're going to pay $2.3 billion to secure Australia's fuel supply, the government should buy the Brisbane refinery in Lytton and let it become an asset owned by the Commonwealth. It would be a hell of a lot cheaper, and this government could then claim it has secured our refining capabilities well beyond 2030.
John F Kennedy was famous for saying: 'Let us never negotiate out of fear. But let us never fear to negotiate.' The truth is this government fears proper negotiations, because multinational companies have walked all over Scott Morrison, just as they did with Malcolm Turnbull, Tony Abbott, Julia Gillard and Kevin Rudd.
I'll say it again: these overseas corporations come here, they drill and mine our resources, and then they pay little to no taxes. Paying oil refineries $2.3 billion to keep operating in this country is hardly in Australia's best interests. We don't get a single share in these facilities. Instead we hand over the cash and simply kiss it goodbye.
Again I remind Labor and the Liberal and National parties what happened to Australia's car industry after they had been given tens of billions of dollars in subsidies. They took the cash and buggered off when it suited them. (1/3)
Brad retweeted
🚨 THIS IS HOW SUPPLY CHAINS COLLAPSE
Australia right now:
Truckers stranded.
Fuel stations EMPTY.
No diesel… anywhere.
“I’ve driven 500km… not a drop left.”
And now?
Lines of trucks… just waiting.
No fuel = no deliveries
No deliveries = empty shelves
This doesn’t stay in Australia.
It spreads.
Watch closely — because once this starts, it moves fast.
#FuckyouTrunp
You did this
Victorians could soon face $7.50 coffees and food price hikes as the fuel crisis hits local supply chains. And with diesel drying up, farmers have an impossible choice between planting crops and cutting their losses. @rochelleebrown1
23
Brad retweeted
The fuel companies are not allowed to price gouge, but the government is allowed to continue gouging you with the fuel excise.
I hate this retard @AlboMP







































