We've heard the arguments for circumcision for decades. But shouldn't we be willing to examine the evidence, question assumptions, and discuss the ethics honestly?
Bodily autonomy matters. Informed consent matters.
Why should boys be excluded from this conversation?
Online arguments rarely change the other person. But everyone watching is listening. Speak to the audience, not just the person arguing back.
November is Men’s Equality Month.
Boys deserve bodily autonomy.
Boys deserve equal protection.
Boys deserve a choice.
Protect their rights from day one. 💙
If a child’s bodily autonomy matters, it should matter for every child. Decisions about permanent procedures deserve the same standard of consent—regardless of sex.
Not every question is asked in good faith. “Sea-lioning” uses endless, seemingly sincere questions to wear someone down and make them look unreasonable for getting frustrated.
Fathers are supposed to protect their sons.
But why do we make permanent decisions about their bodies before they can even say no?
Tradition isn't consent. And love should include protecting a child's right to choose.
Agree or disagree?
Disagreement can sharpen a debate. But when criticism turns into misleading claims and low-effort trolling, it stops being an audit and starts undermining trust.
They brought attention to men’s issues—but attention isn’t the same as progress. Equality means equal rights, protection, and a voice, not a return to old power dynamics.
POTS was accused of changing context of a statement in a interview by releasing a short video of it. The full interview is evidence that the short video does not change the context.
When fairness feels one-sided, some men choose to walk away. The challenge is protecting everyone while making sure accusations are handled fairly and due process applies to all.
Fathers' rights and intactivism are interconnected pieces of a larger movement. True progress comes from uniting under the umbrella of men's equality, where shared standards and rights strengthen every individual cause.
Let's have an honest conversation about circumcision.
Not insults. Not censorship. Not “because I said so.”
Let's examine the medical evidence, discuss the risks, and put children's interests first.
What's the strongest argument FOR infant circumcision and do you think the evidence supports it?
It is becoming increasingly difficult to distinguish AI-led interviews from human ones. People often donate without verifying the source or methodology. Always look closer at the information you consume.
True advocacy isn't a gamble—it's an investment in education. Funding awareness efforts creates tangible results, reaching thousands of parents and shifting perspectives. When the work is based on facts, the return is measurable, not a lottery.
Circumcision is described as genital mutilation, a non-natural practice rooted in the idea that sex is dirty. The procedure removes sensitive skin and nerves from the penis, aimed at desensitizing it.
Claims of immediate FDA or EMA approval for human trials are misleading. The shift to recellularization creates an entirely new product, necessitating fresh animal trials before human testing can even be considered. The timeline simply does not add up.
Michigan's Licensing Agency is Protecting FGM? | Does Being Circumcised Lead to Divorce? | Foregen Fundraiser




