@PYeerk

YOU WILL BE SEEING UNUSUAL ACCOMPLISHMENT BISTRO CALIFORNIUM podcast

patreon.com/BistroCalifornium
Joined April 2020
  • Tweets75.1K
  • Following2.3K
  • Followers32.6K
3.3KMedia
BISTRO CALIFORNIUM S2 Ep. 159 IF I EVER START REFERRING TO THESE AS THE BEST YEARS OF MY LIFE w/ @BradMichaelsson & @DillardsEternal on Richard Linklater's DAZED AND CONFUSED and SCHOOL OF ROCK PATRON'S ONLY patreon.com/BistroCaliforniu…

Ep. 159 IF I EVER START REFERRING TO THESE AS THE BEST YEARS OF MY LIFE w/ Brad Michael Elmore &...

Ep. 159 IF I EVER START REFERRING TO THESE AS THE BEST YEARS OF MY LIFE w/ Brad Michael Elmore & The Eternal Dillard's by BISTRO CALIFORNIUM on Patreon. Join BISTRO CALIFORNIUM's community for...

patreon.com
2
7
3
22
11,492
Police shouldn't be arresting someone for calling a politician a rentboy either, idiot
Math Rock@MathRockSucked11h
Notice how they use the word "after" and not "because". It's genuinely so disheartening how many people saw this and didn't once question it's absurdity. Cattle, each and every one of you.
26
686
one time, my grandma hugged me and I exploded into a gory meat paste on the spot due to my affection allergy. it took me years to recover
2
1
43
668
Make an argument that isn't an insinuation
Matty Murdock
@MightBeDD4h
Yeerk you childless freak - Let me ask you ONE more question, see if you'll answer it - You're arguing that children don't have the right to refuse unwanted touching? But you're a man who doesn't haven't children? Correct? So. A single, childless man, is arguing, on Twitter, that children can be forced into hugging or physical contact - without their consent? Yes? 🤔 #consent
38
656
It is an insinuation- when you begin losing an argument or, I guess, simply enter into a state of terminal confusion like the one you're in right now, you try to recover by portraying criticism of your position as inherently untoward
Matty Murdock
@MightBeDD4h
Replying to @PYeerk
It's not an insinuation. It's a question. That you feel you can't answer it without destabilising your argument is... sad. You don't have kids. So I can't insinuate anything regarding them. I CAN ask hypotheticals, which I am doing. If you're refusing to answer... That's telling.
3
1
28
1,292
It is quite literally your only rhetorical move other than blathering about
22
360
And I'm telling you to make an argument that isn't a slimy insinuation, you freak
Matty Murdock
@MightBeDD4h
Replying to @PYeerk
Sir. This is called a question. You can tell, cause of the question mark at the end of the sentence. If you are prepared to engage in debate, you might answer my question.
2
30
768
I'm going to keep saying this to you because you keep making slimy insinuations and because you are a freak- I hope this helps your understanding
2
24
491
I have to say, I've argued with a lot of stupid, dull, evil people on here before but you are a real specimen- you must have put a great deal of hard work into becoming this truly contemptible and disgusting- I hope you're ashamed of yourself because you deserve to be
1
9
299
Make an argument that isn't an insinuation, freak
Matty Murdock
@MightBeDD4h
Replying to @PYeerk
Do you agree that a hug from a Grandparent is a physical touch?
1
49
910
No, I am arguing that grandparents have the right to hug their grandkids, you sick freak
Matty Murdock
@MightBeDD4h
Excuse me? You don't have kids? But your arguing that kids don't have the right to consent or object to unwanted physical touching? 🤨
4
71
1,060
Don't resort to your slimy insinuations with me because you're not capable of mounting an argument, you disgusting little gimp
1
29
455
I certainly did not say that, you creep- I don't have kids, but even if I did, my "family arrangement" would not be any of your business and it's rude of you to ask- why do you think you have a right to know?
Matty Murdock
@MightBeDD4h
Replying to @PYeerk
OK. So tell me - what's the arrangement in YOUR family. You've already said you force your kids into unwanted physical contact. How far does that extend? Do you force them to sit on people's laps? Do you force them to accept unwanted kissing? Where do YOU draw the line?
2
29
886
I've given you my "personal view" which is that every family is different and ought to be allowed to work these things out themselves- that is my "personal view"
Matty Murdock
@MightBeDD4h
Replying to @PYeerk
But, I'm asking for your own personal view... I'm not trying to help my case... I'm asking you to clarify your own. And you refuse 😂
1
28
738
Here is what I actually said, when you tried to get me on this totally incoherent point
Matty Murdock
@MightBeDD5h
Replying to @PYeerk
You keep posting these publicly - excepting some kind of rush of your followers to defend you. You've what? 33 thousand or something? To my... 144? And... Yet... They don't. That might tell you something. Oh, and while I'm here - I'll ask the question you refused to answer, again. You said a child had the right to refuse to sit on an Uncle's lap. But not to refuse a hug from a Grandparent. OK. Does a child have the right to refuse to sit on their grandparents lap?
1
34
770
Are you actually delusional?
Matty Murdock
@MightBeDD5h
Replying to @PYeerk
Go to bed you sham. You were beat senseless last we talked. I ain't here to wade into your stupidity again.
1
39
711
You are deeply confused about the "question" that you want to ask me, which if I recall, was something about "where I draw the line" and whether, since I think hugs are ok, I might also think it's ok for a grandchild to sit in their grandparents' lap- I gave you my answer, which is that that is for families to decide amongst themselves
Matty Murdock
@MightBeDD5h
Replying to @PYeerk
Ach Yeerk - Did you refuse to answer my questions? And then declare yourself victorious, regardless? 😂 Now. Dummy. Think before you answer. The tweets are still there.
1
13
645
This did not satisfy you for reasons which remain unclear- I would be happy to enlighten you further but so far you have not been able to clarify what it is specifically you want to know that I have not told you, because, I think, you yourself do not have a clear idea of what it is
1
11
379
Do you people ever spend even five seconds thinking through the implications of the things you say? Do you ever give literally give seconds of thought to it?
Bolshevik Muppet@ExtremistChad8h
Replying to @PYeerk
It’s gross and very suspicious to suggest that elderly grandparents could never do something wrong. Any rational grandparent seeing that ad would understand that it’s not about them.
2
1
42
760
A grandparent hugging their grandchild is not a "violation of their bodily autonomy", you freak
chariot of hippia🍍@NoBananaBB6h
Replying to @PYeerk @ExtremistChad
it's deeply nasty and anti-social and cruel to insinuate that children should be taught their consent does not matter, and they should accept violations of their bodily autonomy
1
3
84
1,011
You certainly did not- you are not competent at arguing your case- you frequently get confused and lose track of your original point, fixate on irrelevant questions, repeat yourself and fail to take in information that's already been explained to you
Matty Murdock
@MightBeDD5h
Replying to @PYeerk
Oh Yeerk, I've already beaten you senseless in another thread. Let's not do this again. You're not worth my time. Or attention.
2
72
1,175
Load more