
Feminist, Disabled, Dr. Platformed: @ObjectUK, @UGMediaLtd, @FiLiA_charity, @Transgendertrd, Morning Star, @TweetStreetocc1, @thecriticmag, @WingsScotland
Joined August 2013
- Tweets118K
- Following10.2K
- Followers46.1K
- Likes254K
Pinned Tweet
A thread of my essays on #paedophilia, #transgenderism /transsexualism, #porn, #disability, #WomensRights (almost complete although I'm missing a couple). #RadFem #AntiPorn
1. Charities Creating Climates Conducive to Abuse: uncommongroundmedia.com/%ef%…
Dr EM retweeted
Please be aware if you are going to newsham park scarefest . This is disgraceful, especially when kids are going too.
Dr EM retweeted
I'm still in a cupboard, the only people with less rights than me are Australian women being told some 6" bloke in a dress is going to be doing their smear test.
Dr EM retweeted
Very proud to be part of this documentary about the absolute madness of transgender ideology in Australia. So many harrowing stories told by brave people who simply refused to go along with an obvious lie. Everyone needs to know what is really going on:
Dr EM retweeted
The world No. 1 in women's tennis, Aryna Sabalenka, unleashes a devastating and unfiltered statement: "It's vital to protect fairness. Biologically, men are much stronger than women. It's not fair. It's not equality. It's not women's sports if we let biological men compete against us." She sides with Sophie Cunningham and sends a clear message: women are not going to keep staying silent while they steal our titles, podiums, and opportunities from us.
Dr EM retweeted
Stupid, small things that matter. This disused phone box operated happily as an informal beach toy library on the Falmouth sea front for years until someone decided it had to be removed for “health and safety”. 1/2
Dr EM retweeted
She was born in Iran and built her life in Afghanistan a woman's rights activist with a voice that frightened the men around her.
So her ex-husband threw acid on her face.
In the hospital, after the surgeries, she sat with her head shaved doctors had taken skin from her scalp to rebuild her face. She was still bandaged, still bleeding, still healing.
But her son was not by her side. He was living with his father. And his father set the condition: if you want to talk to your son, you will do it on a video call so I can see what you've become.
She accepted. She needed to hear her child's voice.
On that call, her ex-husband looked at her destroyed face and smiled. He said: "Look at you. You've become like a monster. You'll never dare go out in public again people will be terrified when they see you. I dare you. I dare you to go out and talk about women's rights."
He thought he had broken her. He thought that face was the end of her.
He was wrong.
Every scar on her face became a sentence in her speech. They took her beauty so she took his fear and turned it into courage. Today she walks in public with her head high, and she speaks about women's rights louder than ever.
He wanted to bury her in shame. Instead, he gave the world a witness.
That is why I invited her to our Freedom gala in Poland to dedicate to her the Medal of Freedom I received. Because she is the symbol of resilience itself: the symbol of every woman whose face was burned but whose voice could not be silenced.
Thank you, Poland for opening your doors, for giving visas to my delegation of women from Iran, Afghanistan, and Cameroon.
We are about to start a global women's rights movement and we will go together, all of us, to the German Parliament very soon.
This time, I invited 10 women. In Berlin, we will invite more dissidents.
@FahimaSarfaraz
Dr EM retweeted
“A colleague of mine said to me, if you say you’re a Zionist at the BBC, you might as well say you had your foot on the neck of George Floyd. You’re a murderer. You’re an evil colonialist. You’re a racist. And I’m not any of those things. And neither are the other people I know who are Zionists.”
Extraordinary testimony from the now ex-BBC Exec Producer @imluciekon here. I’ve nothing but admiration for her courage in taking this on. 👇🏼
Dr EM retweeted
Every time the science has been settled, somebody paid for the settlement, and the bill has a name on it.
1747: James Lind cures scurvy with lemons. The Navy keeps it settled as a disease of damp air for forty-eight years and loses more sailors to it than to the French.
1799: Bleeding is settled. George Washington is drained of nearly half his blood for a sore throat and is dead by evening.
1847: Childbed fever is settled as bad air. Ignaz Semmelweis washes his hands and the deaths on his ward fall from one mother in ten to one in a hundred. He is sacked, committed, and beaten to death in an asylum.
1915: Pellagra is settled as an infection. Joseph Goldberger proves it is the corn diet of the poor by injecting himself with sufferers' blood. The South keeps the corn, and 100,000 Americans die of it.
1941: The lobotomy is settled, and about to win a Nobel. Rosemary Kennedy, twenty-three, is left unable to walk or speak, one of 40,000 Americans put under the pick.
1956: The pregnancy X-ray is settled as harmless. Alice Stewart shows one scan doubles a child's chance of cancer. She loses her funding and the scans run for another quarter century.
1961: Thalidomide is settled as safe for morning sickness. Ten thousand babies.
1971: DES is settled as a pregnancy protector. The daughters of the women who took it develop a cancer nobody has seen before.
1972: Sugar is settled as harmless. John Yudkin writes that it is not, and the fat men and the sugar men end his career between them.
1984: Fat is settled as the killer, and a generation of mothers swaps the butter for a tub of oil.
2004: Vioxx is settled as a safe painkiller. Up to 140,000 heart attacks before it is pulled.
The science was settled every single time. The only thing it ever settled was who took the blame afterwards.
Dr EM retweeted
Astounding Sunday Times investigation reveals new scandal in SNP’s Socialist Scotland:
800 NHS, central government, council and quango workers whose jobs no longer exist but remain on the public payroll because of the SNP’s ‘no public-sector redundancy’ policy.
Estimated cost of paying people to do nothing: £27m a year.
One NHS Highland worker has been receiving a full salary and benefits for 17 years despite not having a specific job.
The health board refused to say what the worker had been doing for almost two decades and how much they had been paid.
Likely cost to the taxpayer is expected to be far higher with several public bodies refusing to disclose salaries for hundreds of the workers awaiting redeployment.
A transgender sex offender has been arrested in Minnesota after posing as a teen girl to try and enroll at a local high school.
"Makayla" Alec Ray Craig, who identifies as a female cat, had previously been arrested for the same crime in Oregon last year.
reduxx.info/transgender-sex-…
Dr EM retweeted
Absolutely incredible newsism here.
The 26-year-old Moroccan rapist is somehow younger than his 22-year-old victim.
🔴#ÚLTIMAHORA Detenido un joven de 26 años por agresión sexual a una mujer de 22 en la acampada de la Puerta del Sol
abc.es/espana/madrid/detenid…
Dr EM retweeted
PETITION STARTED BY LEAH’S PARENTS - please sign and share 🙏
Our daughter Leah Croucher went missing on 15 February 2019, walking to work. Her body was found three and a half years later, in the loft of a house half a mile from our family home.
The man who killed her, Neil Maxwell, was a convicted sex offender with a history of serious offending going back to 1998. Months before Leah disappeared, he pleaded guilty to sexually assaulting a woman and was sentenced to a Community Order, not prison. The Probation Service wrongly classified him as medium risk instead of high risk. He then missed a number of Probation appointments, and a police officer raised concerns about his lack of communication just weeks before Leah went missing. He evaded arrest for six months. During that time, he murdered Leah and took his own life.
The Coroner ruled that Leah was unlawfully killed, and that failures by the Police and Probation Service in monitoring Maxwell "may have played a part" in her death.
That's why we, Leah's parents, are calling for Leah's Law: a mandatory minimum prison sentence for anyone convicted of a third sexual offence.
Mandatory minimums already exist for domestic burglary and Class A drug trafficking. There's no justifiable reason sexual offending should be treated more leniently. By a third conviction, it is self-evident that the offender has not been sufficiently deterred from further offending.
Where a case falls below that threshold, we are calling for a District Judge to oversee sentencing in all repeat sexual offence cases, so a decision like the one that let Maxwell walk free can never be made again.
This would have ensured he had no opportunity to kill Leah, and that the risk he presented on his release would have been vastly reduced.
Sign for Leah, and for every family this could still protect.
change.org/p/leah-s-law-mand…
Dr EM retweeted
This film is going to blow your mind.
The situation in Australia is even worse than you think when it comes to gender ideology.
@LyleShelton @Glinner @salltweets @Bernard_Lane @DrewHutton45645 @NationFirstAust @JohnRuddick2 @Jilliantweeting @kevH_27 @dianna_kenny @KyleKutasi and more!
Premiere
Thursday 5th November 2026
PREMIERING NOV 5th
The debate we’re not supposed to have!
whodecidesfilm.com
#Auspol #WhoDecidesFilm
Dr EM retweeted
BREAKING!! Huge news!! Apparently the woman’s soccer game was being held on public property and the US Dept of Justice is looking into the issue on first amendment grounds. Keep talking. They are hearing us!!!!!!!!
Say it louder!!! Women’s sports matter! Women matter!!!
BREAKING: The US Department of Justice is reviewing the forceful ejection of fans wearing XX-XY t-shirts at Friday's Portland Thorns game.
"The Justice Department is aware of these reports and will review the matter thoroughly. Where the facts and the law warrant action, the Department will not hesitate to act."
A DOJ spokesperson also told me, "Based on what is known so far, the conduct described appears to raise viewpoint discrimination and First Amendment questions rather than sex discrimination. The Department is reviewing it."
Dr EM retweeted
This is quite a remarkable article to see in the Irish mainstream press. THE RISE AND THREAT OF THE FAR LEFT finally tackled.... @AnMailleach is a DCU lecturer on politics.
"what should we do about the rise of the far left?"
Another unexpected and excellent article in the legacy media this week. This time it is Eoin O Malley Malley writing for The Sunday Independent (he is also an Associate Professor in politics at the School of Law and Government at Dublin City University) who wonders if everybody has been wrongly focusing on so called "far right" when really it is the far left who are a threat to our society, with their propensity for being violent and encouraging violence in the pursuit of their ideological obsessions. We have put the full article within this post.
He has a go at @pb4p here, and won't be popular with his students after the mid term for that. Perhaps he may even have to deal with what we have had to deal with on a regular basis now for years - unprovoked aggressive physical and verbal attacks from far leftists, along with targeted campaigns of harassment, that most often go unpunished. They view everything through the lens of oppressor versus oppressed, and apparently having an opposing view to them makes you "the oppressor", hence they feel they have a right to unleash hell upon you. We hope @AnMailleach will not have to deal with these so called "anti fascists" (they are of course the real fascists), yet that is the reality of what you have to put up with when these ideologues feel entitled to target you.
The far left have really let their mask slip and others are FINALLY starting to see how dangerous they actually are, and how they've marched through our institutions, capturing them along the path. A lot of damage has been done by now - but we welcome the change of tone, even if it is as the clock strikes thirteen...
"After alarmism over far right, has France shown we’re looking in wrong direction?"
Every month, the Sunday Independent asks a sample of Irish people to choose the issues that most concern them. Top come cost of living, housing and immigration.
At the bottom are usually social media, the Trump administration, Gaza and the rise of the far right. Though the polls show few people regard these as very important, the State spends an inordinate amount of time and energy on them.
The rise of the far right was the reason the previous justice minister, Helen McEntee, wanted to introduce hate-speech legislation. When asked what the far right was, she couldn’t define it, but she saw it was people who might question migration policy and be "anti-government".
I was in the US last week, having been asked to speak about the rise of the far right in Ireland. As many cities in France burned because of protests encouraged by far-left leaders, I asked whether concerns were misplaced.
Should we not be asking what to do about the rise of the far left?
The protests in France emerged from concerns over school funding and probably a sense that career progression has been upended.
In the rioting and looting that followed, far-left leader Jean-Luc Mélenchon praised “white and ugly”. We also see intellectuals such as Nobel prize winner Annie Ernaux defending the protests on the basis that they are standing up to “austerity”, ignoring the galactic cost of the French state. They stood up to austerity by looting luxury shops. Louis Vuitton for all?
While some of that rioting and looting might have been opportunistic and recreational, one might have said the same about the Dublin riots two years ago. Yet those riots sparked reams of statements from politicians concerned about the rise of the far right.
We see no such hand-wringing for events in France. In fact, People Before Profit has celebrated what it terms the “youth revolt”. The Denakryte party has a meeting next Thursday where it will bring together people to “build a movement here capable of confronting capitalism”. PBP wants to bring protests “from the streets of Paris to the streets of Dublin”.
Were it not for the haplessness of PBP’s leadership, one might think that the State should do something about this. It is hardly overstating the case to say that the threat to France is existential. We absolutely do not want what we’ve seen on the streets of Paris brought to the streets of Dublin.
*The danger of the far left is not confined to France.* Last week in Spain, the ethno-nationalist party Vox had its opening event in the Spanish election disrupted by masked anti-fascist protesters. Riot police were needed to allow the meeting go ahead.
Anti-fascism looks an awful lot like fascism when they try to prevent those they disagree with from holding electoral events. The dangers of the far left are not confined to its violent attempts to upend the economy and democracy. It is also a threat to normal social relations.
Take the Government-funded ad telling us that grandparents should think twice before hugging their grandchildren: one of these occasional flare-ups where ordinary people get to see the capture of the State by ideologues who have no sense of Irish people or their values.
There is now, it seems, nothing that the far left feel the State should not regulate, including normal family relationships.
We might dismiss this as a thoughtless and zany group pushing an agenda. But it is far from thoughtless. It is planned. The aim is to transform social relations, including how we think and speak.
*Another example was the "Family A versus Family B" case study that was being taught* to our Junior Cert students through a SPHE curriculum that is pure ideology.
It characterised a traditional red-headed family wearing Aran jumpers, who eat bacon and cabbage, play GAA and holiday in Ireland, as inferior to the “diverse” mixed-race “blended” family who holiday in Europe and eat exotic foods.
As with the ads permission for a bus ad, that particular exercise was withdrawn because its absurdity was widely seen. But the ideological capture of the State continues through the state funding of NGOs."
Dr EM retweeted
My god she's pig ignorant. Simpering, over-privileged, uneducated and too fucking thick to understand what she's parroting. "Cognitive being"? I'm not sure the dusty, haunted attic inside her skull would even begin to register any electrical activity.
Dr EM retweeted
Important. Very.
Yes, the monarchy was deeply implicated in the slave trade. But not the British monarchy.
The biggest African slavers were not pirates or bandits. They were kings. In the 1750s, King Tegbesu of Dahomey, in present-day Benin, was reported to be making £250,000 a year from selling slaves. That astronomical sum, equivalent to perhaps £45 million today, was vastly more than any British aristocrat
While Tegbesu was trafficking human beings, the future George III, who had recently become Prince of Wales, was becoming a convinced abolitionist. He wrote a monograph arguing that “slavery is equaly [sic] repugnant to the Civil Law as to the Law of Nature”. He went on, as King, to sign the abolition of the slave trade into law in 1807.
That act prompted incredulous rage among West African chiefs.
In the 1840s, King Ghezo of Dahomey, played by John Boyega in the 2022 film, The Woman King, fiercely resisted such pressure.
“The slave trade is the ruling principle of my people. It is the source and the glory of their wealth,” he complained.
Contrast his attitude with that of his British fellow-monarchs. Although Victoria, as Queen, was expected to refrain from expressing political opinions, her husband was under less constraint. Albert made his very first speech as Prince Consort to the Society for the Extinction of the Slave Trade and for the Civilization of Africa. His words are a reminder of how determined Britain was to ensure that ending the Atlantic slave trade did not simply push the commerce eastwards.
“I deeply regret that the benevolent and persevering exertions of England to abolish that atrocious traffic in human beings (at once the desolation of Africa and the blackest stain upon civilized Europe) have not as yet led to any satisfactory conclusion. But I sincerely trust that this great country will not relax in its efforts until it has finally, and for ever, put an end to a state of things so repugnant.”
The difference between the British Crown and contemporary African monarchies can be glimpsed in the story of Aina, a young Yoruba girl owned by King Ghezo of Dahomey.
In 1850, a naval captain called Frederick Forbes came to Dahomey to try to convince Ghezo to stop selling slaves. He was unsuccessful but, during his visit, he was offered Aina as a gift.
Forbes knew that such slaves were generally destined for human sacrifice, so he accepted the child, naming her Sara Forbes Bonetta. When Sara arrived in Britain, Queen Victoria became her godmother, paid for her education and arranged for her to marry a wealthy Yoruba businessman. Are the British really the baddies here?
Critics talk of telling our nation’s story “warts and all”; but they rarely get around to the “and all”. The “and all” surely includes the vast sums devoted to stamping out slavery, calculated by Chaim Kaufmann and Robert Pape as 1.8 per cent annually of GDP between 1808 and 1867, the most expensive moral foreign policy in human history. Even if there were a case for reparations in principle (which there is not) that sum alone – not counting the billions given in aid – would surely have covered any debt.
What we are seeing is not a debate about history, but an argument about contemporary politics. Critics want to convince us that Britain became rich through exploitation rather than, as was actually the case, through private property, free contracts and independent courts.
The easiest way to demonstrate the negative correlation between capitalism and slavery is to look at the places where human bondage is most prevalent today – in order, North Korea, Eritrea, Burundi, the Central African Republic and Mauritania. If William III owning shares in the Royal African Company bothers you more than the continuing abomination of slavery in those places, you need to ask yourself some hard questions about your motives.
Dr EM retweeted
Equally heartbreaking testimony on the profile of kids being seen in NHS Gender Clinics. Soon the Conversion Practices Bill would reinforce the harm... 2/
Dr EM retweeted
One of the most disturbing aspects of this unfolding scandal is how successfully the public has been kept in the dark. If people understood the full extent of what has been happening to vulnerable children, I believe the outrage would be overwhelming.
What the ideologues driving this agenda have achieved, with the willing connivance of progressive political parties and much of the media, is extraordinary. They’ve managed to dress up a child harming scandal as an emancipation movement, and present potentially devastating, irreversible interventions on vulnerable children as acts of kindness and compassion.
And this is where I believe my own employer, the BBC, bears enormous responsibility. Had it subjected these claims to robust scrutiny from the outset, rather than actively promoting gender ideology, how many vulnerable children might have been spared life-altering harm that can never be undone?
There have, of course, been notable exceptions at the BBC: a handful of journalists who have asked the difficult questions.
But the occasional investigation on Newsnight or Panorama hardly has the same cut-through as the stories the BBC relentlessly promotes across its platforms.
Consider how much attention Meghan Markle is receiving right now, compared with the scrutiny devoted to vulnerable children undergoing puberty suppression or irreversible surgery in the name of so-called progress.
The BBC knows perfectly well how to make an issue impossible to ignore. The question is, why hasn’t it? Well, we know why: institutional capture.
When the reckoning comes, as it surely will, and the children harmed by these interventions grow into adults forced to live with the devastating, irreversible consequences, those who were supposed to protect them must be held accountable for their betrayal.
So too must the political and media establishment that put progressive virtue-signalling ahead of safeguarding vulnerable children, and ideological conformity ahead of confronting the harm being done.
And I fear that the BBC, which has failed a generation of vulnerable young people so comprehensively, will find itself engulfed in the greatest scandal of its history.
Extraordinary testimony from Baroness Cass yesterday on the profile of children who will be part of the *Puberty Blockers Trial*. Little kids who have been 'socially transitioned' from early childhood. Harmed by their parents - reinforced by the State... @Transgendertrd 1/
Dr EM retweeted
On the second of May 1927 the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that a twenty-year-old Virginia girl should be sterilised against her will on the grounds that she, her mother and her baby daughter were all feeble-minded, and four years later the baby daughter was on the honour roll at school.
Carrie Buck had been taken from her mother at three and given to a foster family in Charlottesville, who kept her out of school from the sixth grade to do their housework. At seventeen she was raped by the family's nephew and fell pregnant, and the family, rather than have the thing spoken of, had her committed to the state colony for epileptics and the feeble-minded as incorrigible and promiscuous. Her mother was already in it. Carrie's baby, Vivian, was taken from her and given to the same foster family that had covered up the rape.
The colony's superintendent had a new law he wanted tested, and Carrie was the test. Virginia's sterilisation statute needed a case to go all the way to the Supreme Court so that it could be copied by every other state, and the colony chose the quiet girl with the illegitimate child and the mother in the ward. It gave her a lawyer, who had sat on the colony's board and was a close friend of the superintendent, and who called no witnesses and put up no fight. A social worker testified that the baby, at seven months, had a look about her that was not quite normal. That was the evidence for the third generation.
Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote the opinion for eight of the nine justices, and the sentence in it is the most notorious in the Court's history: three generations of imbeciles are enough. Carrie was sterilised at the colony that October. Over the following fifty years the number of Americans sterilised under laws her case had upheld climbed past sixty thousand, and Nazi defendants cited it in their own defence at Nuremberg.
Vivian went to school in Charlottesville, was marked average or better, and made the honour roll in 1931. She died of an illness the next year, aged eight. Carrie was released, married twice, read the newspaper every day, and was traced in 1980 after she and her husband had been found malnourished in their home near Charlottesville, lucid and ordinary, and angry to the end. They done me wrong, she said. They done us all wrong. Her sister Doris had been sterilised at the same colony at sixteen and told it was an appendix operation, and had spent her marriage trying for children and wondering.
Buck v. Bell has never been overturned. It is still cited.
The father figure who should have protected her was a foster home that handed her to the state. The expert was a superintendent with a law to test. The daughter who was the proof of the family's defect brought home a report card, and it was good.

































