ExPATistan
Joined January 2013
Non-Sensitive Data Specialist 🇵🇸 retweeted
🇺🇦🇷🇺 You chose the side that keeps MIC revenues pumping. Being a useful idiot for the MIC is what gets Ukrainians killed. The longer we pretend this war is about democracy, the more Ukrainians die. The war is the product. Your ignorance directly determines how long the grift continues.
Ed "I don't take sides" Sheeran
36
120
8
582
32,475
Non-Sensitive Data Specialist 🇵🇸 retweeted
Bank of Scotland offered me a new product for my savings account the same week they closed my 39 year old account without explanation or ANY notice never mind the notice legally required. They have sent me a cheque for my funds although I have no other bank in which I can lodge it. @KRWLaw @LloydsBank
176
767
12
3,459
109,504
Non-Sensitive Data Specialist 🇵🇸 retweeted
Sam Bankman-Fried's $500 million Anthropic investment was famously liquidated in FTX's bankruptcy for $1.3 billion. SBF's friends/co-conspirators Caroline Ellison and Nishad Singh also invested in Anthropic. Their shares took a different path.... businessinsider.com/sam-bank…
1
6
2
46
24,829
Non-Sensitive Data Specialist 🇵🇸 retweeted
The people who pushed self custody and the “it’s easy - it’s just 12 words” mentality deserve some blame. This is why many are in cope mode and trying to figure out an excuse or justification. Many won’t admit that they were simple wrong and that self custody is a massive risk. They also can’t easily simply throw one company under the bus because almost none of them ever warned about this risk or saw it coming. It’s not a good situation. Best course is honesty and humility. Self custody I is horrible and fraught with risk. Centralized custody is also horrible and fraught with risk. We as an industry must work hard to improve both.
25
6
3
84
8,967
Non-Sensitive Data Specialist 🇵🇸 retweeted
Not a single word from the Russians, the Chinese, the European Union, or the entire global community about this scandalous episode. My impression is that we are regressing by decades, perhaps even centuries, in just a few years. No one knows where this money is going, while the White House has become a partner in Venezuela’s poverty. And in the face of this, some real idiots in Israel and the Pentagon expected an uprising in Iran. Who would be crazy enough to rebel against their own nation when a foreign power is brazenly threatening to loot their country’s coffers? It is astonishing what we are witnessing in these times amid the global silence. Trump has placed the US in such a position of low moral standing that there is no way the world can place any confidence in either the dollar or in American foreign policy. Whoever comes to govern America after Trump, and this will only happen after a great deal of internal chaos, will have an immense task ahead that will take many, many years.
253
1,572
85
4,908
153,630
Non-Sensitive Data Specialist 🇵🇸 retweeted
Probably Sarah Ferguson’s worst interview to date. This guy schooled her and she was left stumbling.
360
1,641
84
7,036
185,590
Non-Sensitive Data Specialist 🇵🇸 retweeted
We've been quiet recently because Mark Goodwin and I have been working to write the most comprehensive investigation into Polymarket's origins and ambitions to date. We found that Polymarket's "official" origin story, that Shayne Coplan founded the company alone in 2020 and then built "the company in his bathroom", is a lie. Polymarket really started years earlier as another company called TokenBnk that was deeply tied to Israeli interests, specifically a crypto company founded by Benjamin Netanyahu's niece and nephew. Coplan has actively tried to obfuscate this company from his story and it's not the only thing either. In Part 1 of this two-part series, we unravel the real history of Polymarket, directly connecting the company to Peter Thiel's efforts to resurrect controversial DARPA programs from its now defunct Information Awareness Office. Polymarket appears to have been chosen by Thiel and his associates to succeed in resurrecting DARPA's Policy Analysis Market where another Thiel-linked company, Augur, had previously failed. Stay tuned for Part 2, where we explore the current influence of prediction markets and Polymarket, including how an insidious effort to have prediction markets replace representative democracy as a governance model is already being slowly implemented by the White House. Read Part 1 here: unlimitedhangout.com/2026/06…
826
9,827
893
30,635
3,560,643
Non-Sensitive Data Specialist 🇵🇸 retweeted
About free speech: More people should know that Piers Morgan reported me to the Metropolitan Police for this interview.
421
9,109
216
23,271
502,663
Non-Sensitive Data Specialist 🇵🇸 retweeted
Don't be deceived by the Western media. The Epstein Coalition is targeting Iranian civilians.
139
3,700
51
8,103
90,569
Non-Sensitive Data Specialist 🇵🇸 retweeted
If the preposterous notion that “Iran bombed its own school” was true there would be evidence. If there was evidence the US would not just be sharing it, they would be blasting it everywhere. Instead, what has the pentagon and White House said? “It’s under investigation.” This is exactly what you’d say if you did something horrible and don’t want to admit it. There was a missile misfire hundreds of miles away and a widely pushed image of this combined with a false narrative saying that this was the missile and Iran hit its own school. And no, Iran did not “admit they did it”. This was false. Why would someone make up such a lie and push it? To cover for a horrible truth. The UN, who is aligned with the US also seems to have admitted it was US & Israeli bombs that hit the school. Because it’s impossible to lie about something so horrible they try to pivot. Now the narrative seems to be shifting to “well maybe the US/ Israel killed those school girls…but it was an accident because Iran was using them as human shields and hid the school inside a base…” The simplest explanation of things is often the truth. The two psychopathic countries who have killed thousands of kids in their wars launched an unwarranted and illegal war of aggression on a country and bombed them. Those bombs killed the girls. Most tragically is that the US has already announced it will have a more major and extensive bombing campaign. These deaths will likely be surpassed with thousands more. Just as in the rubble of Gaza, the human toll and life lost will be hard to comprehend. As more dead take up we won’t be talking about this first loss of life. Soon they will drop all pretense that we are “helping Iranians” and move to the true goal, doing what the US and Israel do best: mass murdering civilians. How many will die? 10,000? 100,000 or more? And for what? Psychopaths. The murder of these girls is only the first in a long line of horrors and crimes to come. If you support this war then their deaths and the more to come are on you.
20
14
93
5,168
In what sort of distopian hellscape is this even remotely reasonable or logical? 😳
The three people interviewed by Sharyn Alfonsi in this 60 Minutes clip about policing online hate speech in Germany are: Dr. Matthäus Fink: A German state prosecutor specializing in hate speech cases. Svenja Meininghaus: A German state prosecutor working on online hate speech enforcement. Frank-Michael Laue: A German state prosecutor who leads the Lower Saxony unit focused on hate speech investigations. All 3 are World-class retards.
75
Non-Sensitive Data Specialist 🇵🇸 retweeted
As one of the most influential leaders in Bitcoin, please seriously investigate whether Bitcoin can migrate to being quantum-resistant, as this could potentially result in serious harm and losses to institutions and investors. 🙏 #Bitcoin 1. No suitable quantum-resistant algorithm 2. Hash-based and lattice-based algorithms have excessively large public keys and signatures 3. Migrating to quantum-resistant algorithms could cause severe on-chain congestion and even paralysis 4. Quantum-resistant algorithms result in a significant reduction in transaction efficiency 5. Increased node and transaction fees 6. Who has the authority to freeze or burn Satoshi’s addresses and other lost addresses 7. The aggregation threshold in quantum-resistant algorithms is challenging 8. Taproot makes the transition to quantum-resistant even more difficult 9. High hardware upgrade costs 10. 1MB block size is not suitable for quantum-resistant algorithms 11.Achieving global consensus is extremely difficult I could probably list ten more obstacles to the migration...
The Bitcoin Quantum Leap: Quantum computing won’t break Bitcoin—it will harden it. The network upgrades, active coins migrate, lost coins stay frozen. Security goes up. Supply comes down. Bitcoin grows stronger.
1
4
2
13
921
Non-Sensitive Data Specialist 🇵🇸 retweeted
THE TIMELINE OF THE $MSTR HIT JOB IS COMPLETE: It All Makes Sense Now JP Morgan and Morgan Stanley are launching leveraged $IBIT products. The Connection: Who is MSCI? Morgan Stanley Capital International. The Play: The Index (MSCI) threatens to displace their competitors (MSTR/MTPLF, etc), and the banks (MS & JPM) file products to capture displaced capital into IBIT. The UPDATED Timeline - May 14: Jim Chanos announces his "Long $BTC, Short $MSTR" trade; a blatant attempt to sway market sentiment. July 7: JP Morgan implements a firm-wide margin hike on trading $MSTR (50% to 95%). Aug 29: JP Morgan releases a fact sheet and preliminary pricing supplement for leveraged products linked to $IBIT. (Image attached) Sept 12: Metaplanet announces a capital raise. MSCI panics, realizing more companies are adopting the Saylor Playbook at scale. Oct 10: MSCI announces “...an extension of its ongoing consultation with the investment community…” exactly 16 minutes before President Trump’s tariff announcement (4:50 PM EDT) that triggered the global flash crash. Oct 14 (4 days later): Morgan Stanley (the creator and former parent company of MSCI) files with the SEC for a "Contingent Income Auto-Callable Security" linked to IBIT. (Links below) Nov 14: JP Morgan files for its own IBIT structured note. Nov 20 (THE KILL SHOT): On the exact same day - JPMorgan releases the "Free Writing Prospectus" to sell its IBIT note. JPMorgan dredges up the 42-day-old MSCI note to scream "Delisting Risk." Present Day: We still see reports of frozen $MSTR share transfers out of JPM and failure-to-deliver (FTD) spikes in $MSTR. They aren't protecting you from risk. They are trying to kill $MSTR to engineer a migration to their products for Bitcoin leverage exposure.
THE TIMELINE OF A HIT JOB MORE PROOF of a coordinated attack against $MSTR and Digital Asset Treasury Companies. They want you to think this delisting decision is organic. The timeline proves it is discriminatory theater. I went back and tracked the dates. This didn't start with MSCI. It started with a short seller, a liquidity squeeze, and an overreaction to Metaplanet. THE TIMELINE May 14: Jim Chanos announces his "Long $BTC, Short $MSTR" trade; a blatant attempt to sway market sentiment. July 7: JP Morgan implements a firm wide margin hike on trading $MSTR (50% to 95%). Translation: They choked off leverage to force liquidations, in a clearly hostile act to manufacture selling pressure. Sept 12: Metaplanet announces a capital raise. MSCI panics realizing that more companies are adopting the Saylor Playbook at scale. THE SMOKING GUN - In the (attached) Sept 12 announcement, MSCI admits the quiet part out loud: “...to avoid potential reverse turnover, MSCI will exceptionally not implement the public offering of METAPLANET...” They froze $MTPLF out to obstruct the trend of $BTC on corporate balance sheets. This wasn't "consulting” with the market, this was gatekeeping. Oct 10: MSCI announces “...an extension of its ongoing consultation with the investment community…” at 8:34 PM GMT. Translation: They need more time to build out a retroactive cover story. The Kicker: This was exactly 16 minutes before President Trump’s Tariff announcement (4:50 PM EDT) that triggered the Global Flash Crash. No way this is just coincidence. They used the macro panic as a smoke screen to bury the announcement. Nov 20: $MSTR | $BTC sentiment is in the tank. JP Morgan sees an opportunity. They dredge up the 42 day old MSCI note (that was prompted by the 69 day old Metaplanet note) and raise the alarm on the "de-listing" for Strategy. The Reality? They make NO MENTION of the other 38 companies this rule impacts (List attached in that comments to this post). Present Day: We are seeing reports of frozen $MSTR share transfers out of JPM and Failure to Deliver (FTD) spikes in $MSTR. This is a wanton, shameless targeting of $MSTR dressed up as "responsible oversight”.  Look behind the veil, don't fall for the theatrics.
217
755
116
3,553
604,160
Non-Sensitive Data Specialist 🇵🇸 retweeted
For this post on X in Germany, police raided the poster’s home, seized his phone, took his biometrics, demanded his DNA, and warned he’s under now police surveillance.
A man in Germany called government workers “parasites” on X. A few hundred views later, police raided his home, seized his phone, took biometrics, demanded DNA, and warned he’s under surveillance.
545
4,317
323
19,886
991,343
Non-Sensitive Data Specialist 🇵🇸 retweeted
Could’ve been a contender
WHAT REALLY HAPPENED WITH FTX2.0 this story is so crazy and it is one of the highlights/lowlights of my life to have witnessed it - the real story is even wilder. In between FTX and Kraken, Arj recruited me to run the bid for the FTX2.0 reboot and our conglomerate was one of the 3 finalists. That’s the reason I resigned from the UCC, I had (wrongly) assumed the bankruptcy lawyers were intending to allow the sale to continue bringing billions in value to the FTX creditor estate. Contrary to Andrew Dieterich’s lies about nobody wanting to buy FTX2.0, there were 3 credible and well funded finalists in the sale process 1. Arj/Tribe + undisclosed public exchange. Arj is now IPO’ing Kraken instead. 2. @ThomasFarley’s Bullish (since IPO’d at $6B, now $9B) 3. @mcagney’s Figure (since IPO’d at $5B, now $8B) Each of these offers had significant equity components on the table that would have added tens of billions in value to all FTX creditors holdings but the lawyers killed the deal. This was as much of a surprise to us as the general public and creditors given the value left on the table. As a reminder, FTX was the second largest exchange in the world, Binance was experiencing record outflows, CZ went to prison, the US government became their compliance dept, their marketshare dropped well below 70% and has never recovered. FTX2.0 bidders promised to tokenize claims and run the multi-billion dollar venture and crypto portfolio, who better to run this than Arj, one of our generation’s greatest capital allocators, or Tom/Cagney each of whom are absolute, stone cold killers on a warpath to victory. FTX creditors would have benefited from any of them, instead we got John “Anthropic is vaporware” Ray, Sullcrom shut down the sale and basically all 9M customers moved to Hyperliquid
1
1
12
1,430
Not expressing an opinion but retweeting this as it has to be of interest to anyone who followed developments post-collapse whatever their beliefs were/are.
WHAT REALLY HAPPENED WITH FTX2.0 this story is so crazy and it is one of the highlights/lowlights of my life to have witnessed it - the real story is even wilder. In between FTX and Kraken, Arj recruited me to run the bid for the FTX2.0 reboot and our conglomerate was one of the 3 finalists. That’s the reason I resigned from the UCC, I had (wrongly) assumed the bankruptcy lawyers were intending to allow the sale to continue bringing billions in value to the FTX creditor estate. Contrary to Andrew Dieterich’s lies about nobody wanting to buy FTX2.0, there were 3 credible and well funded finalists in the sale process 1. Arj/Tribe + undisclosed public exchange. Arj is now IPO’ing Kraken instead. 2. @ThomasFarley’s Bullish (since IPO’d at $6B, now $9B) 3. @mcagney’s Figure (since IPO’d at $5B, now $8B) Each of these offers had significant equity components on the table that would have added tens of billions in value to all FTX creditors holdings but the lawyers killed the deal. This was as much of a surprise to us as the general public and creditors given the value left on the table. As a reminder, FTX was the second largest exchange in the world, Binance was experiencing record outflows, CZ went to prison, the US government became their compliance dept, their marketshare dropped well below 70% and has never recovered. FTX2.0 bidders promised to tokenize claims and run the multi-billion dollar venture and crypto portfolio, who better to run this than Arj, one of our generation’s greatest capital allocators, or Tom/Cagney each of whom are absolute, stone cold killers on a warpath to victory. FTX creditors would have benefited from any of them, instead we got John “Anthropic is vaporware” Ray, Sullcrom shut down the sale and basically all 9M customers moved to Hyperliquid
5
173
Non-Sensitive Data Specialist 🇵🇸 retweeted
The reason nobody is sure why BTC is pulling back is because everyone is looking for a single cause when this is actually a systems failure with multiple transmission mechanisms reinforcing each other. Here's what actually happened mechanistically: Bitcoin ran from $40,000 to $126,000 in less than a year on a very specific narrative: Federal Reserve easing cycle plus institutional adoption through ETFs equals sustained bull market. The market built up $94 billion in futures open interest, with some platforms offering leverage ratios as high as 1,001 to 1. That setup alone created extraordinary fragility. The trigger was simple but devastating. Fed officials reversed dovish expectations completely. The market went from pricing a 90 percent probability of December rate cuts to just 40 percent. Real yields on short term Treasuries stayed elevated above 5 percent. The entire macro story that justified Bitcoin at $126,000 collapsed in a matter of weeks. Now here's where the structural vulnerability shows up. The new ETF infrastructure that everyone celebrated as bringing institutional money actually created institutional scale sell liquidity that never existed before. When the macro narrative broke, institutions could exit with one click. We saw $1.1 billion in ETF outflows in just days. This isn't retail panic selling. This is professional portfolio managers rebalancing away from an asset whose fundamental thesis just evaporated. Simultaneously, long term holders who bought Bitcoin between $40,000 and $80,000 started distributing. They offloaded 815,000 Bitcoin in 30 days. These holders aren't selling because they think Bitcoin is worthless. They're selling because they see volatility ahead and they're sitting on 50 to 150 percent profits. Smart money doesn't ride drawdowns when they can step aside and rebuy lower with the same capital. Here's where it becomes a cascade. When price broke the $100,000 support level, technical stops triggered across the entire derivatives complex. Over $20 billion in leveraged positions got liquidated throughout October and November. Some single day events saw $3.2 billion wiped out. The liquidations themselves created additional selling pressure, which triggered more stops, which forced more liquidations. Open interest collapsed from $94 billion to $68 billion, but there's probably still more leverage that needs to clear. The critical insight everyone is missing: there are no natural buyers at these price levels. Institutions are rebalancing away from risk assets. Long term holders are waiting for lower prices to rebuy. Retail got scared off by the violence of the move. And new buyers won't step in until the leverage gets fully flushed and price stabilizes. So the market has to fall far enough to accomplish three things. Clear the remaining leverage completely. Reach prices where long term holders stop distributing and start accumulating again. Find the level where actual value buyers with real capital see opportunity worth the volatility risk. The $600 billion wipeout you're seeing is mostly the evaporation of unrealized gains that were paper wealth to begin with. When Bitcoin went from $40,000 to $126,000, that represented about $1.7 trillion added to market cap. A lot of that was pure multiple expansion based on a macro narrative that turned out to be wrong. Now the market is repricing based on reality: high real yields, no Fed easing, strong dollar environment. This isn't mysterious. It's textbook deleveraging dynamics in an asset with no cash flows to anchor valuation, extreme leverage ratios, and a macro thesis that broke. A 25 percent correction after a 215 percent rally with 1,000x leverage in the system is actually normal market behavior when the fundamental story changes. The violence of the move reflects the amount of leverage that was built up, not any change in Bitcoin's long term prospects. The real question isn't why did this happen. The real question is what price level actually clears the market and brings in genuine buyers rather than leveraged speculators. That's still being discovered.
193
802
229
6,487
1,131,928
Non-Sensitive Data Specialist 🇵🇸 retweeted
I failed. My kid's hockey rink uses @Square. I tried getting them onboarded last night but it was way too busy for them to even take a look! I'll try again on Friday! Today my mission is to get the Turkish restaurant that I've been trying to onboard for a few years to accept bitcoin with Square.
21
5
1
181
17,616
Non-Sensitive Data Specialist 🇵🇸 retweeted
POV: you pay for your coffee with bitcoin ☕
156
218
107
1,384
488,536
Non-Sensitive Data Specialist 🇵🇸 retweeted
Podcast Episode 4: Part 1 with @SilvermanJacob author of NYT best seller and the newly published awesome book, Gilded Rage We cover tech moguls motivations, oligarch takeover of politics, Peter Thiel, Bill Ackman and much much more Enjoy Sponsored by Paradex
10
35
1
102
42,721